User talk:109.186.234.86: Difference between revisions
ThomasO1989 (talk | contribs) →Edit warring, again: new section |
Binksternet (talk | contribs) Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Karl Riedl. (TW) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You are repeating the same behavior you were warned against numerous times and were blocked for. Keep it up and you '''will''' be blocked again, most likely for an even longer period of time. Holding discussions arguing for or against addition of material on the articles' talk pages, not through edit summaries of each revert, is the appropriate way to settle disagreement and form consensus. BTW, the other editor on [[Karl Riedl]] did provide a reference to Variety magazine in the same edit you have reverted at least twice. It shows you are blindly reverting without actually considering or even reading what he is adding. --[[User:ThomasO1989|ThomasO1989]] ([[User talk:ThomasO1989|talk]]) 21:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC) |
You are repeating the same behavior you were warned against numerous times and were blocked for. Keep it up and you '''will''' be blocked again, most likely for an even longer period of time. Holding discussions arguing for or against addition of material on the articles' talk pages, not through edit summaries of each revert, is the appropriate way to settle disagreement and form consensus. BTW, the other editor on [[Karl Riedl]] did provide a reference to Variety magazine in the same edit you have reverted at least twice. It shows you are blindly reverting without actually considering or even reading what he is adding. --[[User:ThomasO1989|ThomasO1989]] ([[User talk:ThomasO1989|talk]]) 21:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
== August 2013 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Karl Riedl]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[WP:BRD|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 21:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
Revision as of 21:10, 26 August 2013
Edit warring, again
You are repeating the same behavior you were warned against numerous times and were blocked for. Keep it up and you will be blocked again, most likely for an even longer period of time. Holding discussions arguing for or against addition of material on the articles' talk pages, not through edit summaries of each revert, is the appropriate way to settle disagreement and form consensus. BTW, the other editor on Karl Riedl did provide a reference to Variety magazine in the same edit you have reverted at least twice. It shows you are blindly reverting without actually considering or even reading what he is adding. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 21:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Your recent editing history at Karl Riedl shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 21:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.