Talk:Impulse Space: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:18, 9 September 2023

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Space (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Space, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.SpaceWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceTemplate:WikiProject SpaceSpace articles

Ready for mainspace

I have reviewed the work done on this article over the last few weeks, and in my opinion it’s ready to be moved to mainspace. Jeff Foust and Eric Berger in particular are experts reporting on new space ventures.

@CNMall41, would you agree? PKM (talk) 04:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would not. The new content now makes the article read like an advertisement for the company. I didn't even check the references as I feel it would need a substantial tone down prior to anything. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will actually take a closer look later tonight. If the references show notability, I will take a stab at cleaning up the tone. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:52, 9 September 2023 edit CNMall41 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 68,445 edits R ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:18, 9 September 2023 edit undo CNMall41 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 68,445 edits R Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:I would not. The new content now makes the article read like an advertisement for the company. I didn't even check the references as I feel it would need a substantial tone down prior to anything. --[[User:CNMall41\|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41\|talk]]) 22:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)		:I would not. The new content now makes the article read like an advertisement for the company. I didn't even check the references as I feel it would need a substantial tone down prior to anything. --[[User:CNMall41\|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41\|talk]]) 22:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
			:I will actually take a closer look later tonight. If the references show notability, I will take a stab at cleaning up the tone. --[[User:CNMall41\|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41\|talk]]) 23:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)