Talk:Here's your mule: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:01, 23 January 2012

Songs C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move Mike Cline (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's Your Mule → Here's your mule – – per MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; the article is as much about the song(s) as it is the phrase qua phrase. Powers ^T 15:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps so, but then if we keep the caps we need to rewrite the lead to say "Here's Your Mule is a song..." – Dicklyon (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move again

The request to rename this article to Here's your mule has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

Here's Your Mule → Here's your mule – I looked at how to implement the idea from the first RM about making the article about the song, but I couldn't see a way to do that. There are various songs going along with the various phrases mentioned in the lead, and the article is more about the phrase and its origin and influence than about one or more songs in particular. Since that's where we are, I don't see how we can justify keeping it capitalized. Hopefully we'll get more comments this time, or avoid the oppostion. Dicklyon (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, article subject is the phrase, not the song(s).--Kotniski (talk) 08:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose again. I would have appreciated notification of the reopening of discussion. Most of the article is clearly about the songs which bear the title; as such there's nothing wrong with using title case. Powers ^T 20:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would only make sense to me if the subject of the article actually was one of those songs. As long as the subject is the phrase (and the songs are mentioned merely as a use of that phrase), it's misleading to readers to title the article with caps.--Kotniski (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 *'''Support''', article subject is the phrase, not the song(s).--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 08:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Oppose''' again.  I would have appreciated notification of the reopening of discussion.  Most of the article is clearly about the songs which bear the title; as such there's nothing wrong with using title case.  [[User:LtPowers|Powers]] <sup><small><small>[[User talk:LtPowers|T]]</small></small></sup> 20:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
+::That would only make sense to me if the subject of the article actually was one of those songs. As long as the subject is the phrase (and the songs are mentioned merely as a use of that phrase), it's misleading to readers to title the article with caps.--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 23:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)