Jump to content

Talk:Hard and soft magic systems: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Too opinionated?
Fan page?: new section
Line 10: Line 10:
Apart from the fact that a lot of the writing seems to be really basic, there are too many uses of terms like "interesting" making it seem far from neutral. Also not sure about the sources.
Apart from the fact that a lot of the writing seems to be really basic, there are too many uses of terms like "interesting" making it seem far from neutral. Also not sure about the sources.
[[Special:Contributions/2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0|2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0]] ([[User talk:2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0|talk]]) 21:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0|2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0]] ([[User talk:2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0|talk]]) 21:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

== Fan page? ==

This reads like a fan page for an idea of Brandon Sanderson. Page should be cut down and merged to [[Brandon Sanderson]]----[[User:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">'''Cailil'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Cailil|<span style="color: #808080;">''talk''</span>]]</sup> 17:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:15, 27 July 2019

WikiProject iconLiterature NA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

This article's title should move from Hard and Soft Magic Systems to Hard and soft magic systems, since Wikipedia article titles use sentence case.

Also, there seems to be a problem of over-reliance on one source. This seems like a useful conceptual distinction; is nobody using it but Brandon Sanderson? Q·L·1968 23:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editorializing

Apart from the fact that a lot of the writing seems to be really basic, there are too many uses of terms like "interesting" making it seem far from neutral. Also not sure about the sources. 2409:4042:2496:3AEB:4953:EF96:4CAF:C0 (talk) 21:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fan page?

This reads like a fan page for an idea of Brandon Sanderson. Page should be cut down and merged to Brandon Sanderson----Cailil talk 17:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]