Talk:Ghostbusters (2016 film): Difference between revisions
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
*'''Support''' per [[WP:SUBTITLE]]. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 09:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' per [[WP:SUBTITLE]]. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 09:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' - vastly not the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] per the sources used in the article. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 21:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' - vastly not the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] per the sources used in the article. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 21:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
::Also, had anything changed since this discussion [[Talk:Ghostbusters (2016 film)/Archive 4#Requested move 4 September 2016]].--[[Special:Contributions/65.93.194.2|65.93.194.2]] ([[User talk:65.93.194.2|talk]]) 22:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:27, 25 August 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghostbusters (2016 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Summary of critical response
The article intro contains warning comments <!--Consensus on talk is to omit a summarized reception statement--> and <!-- Please see discussion before adding information regarding critical reception. As review aggregators do not agree on the summary of reception, current consensus is against adding a general summary, per WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. -->
These warnings appear to have been ignored repeatedly and a summary added anyway: "The film received generally favorable reviews from critics for the cast and visuals, but criticism for the script". An anon ipv6 seems to be just the latest example[1] of someone ignoring the comments and expanding the attempt at summary of the critical response without any discussion.
Previous discussions:
- 2016 Talk:Ghostbusters_(2016_film)/Archive_3#Consensus_on_excluding_summary_statement_for_critical_reception
- 2017 Talk:Ghostbusters_(2016_film)/Archive_4#On_that_lede_change
Could editors familiar with the past discussions please restore the to whatever the consensus was (or delete the warning comments). -- 109.78.211.204 (talk) 14:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- MASEM has cleaned up the intro.[2] I will take this as the last good version.
- If editors want to do something different please discuss and establish a consensus first. -- 109.78.211.204 (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- MASEM has cleaned up the intro.[2] I will take this as the last good version.
The warning comment was ignored again, so I removed the attempt at a summary of the critical response again.[3] -- 109.78.196.125 (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ignored again, but promptly reverted.[4] Are editors actively ignoring the warning or is it invisible to visual editor users? -- 109.79.73.171 (talk) 06:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Soundtrack Singles
I think the song "Saw it Coming" by G-Easy ft. Jeremiah the single should be a page. Enter your username my name was taken (talk) 17:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 31 May 2021
- Ghostbusters (2016 film) → Ghostbusters: Answer the Call
- Support,The poster, the credits at the very end of the movie, and Paul Feig himself have all referred to this movie as Ghostbusters: Answer the Call. Even BEFORE the home media release. I think that is a more appopiate name for this article. ScottSullivan1 (talk) 07:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 25 August 2021
It has been proposed in this section that Ghostbusters (2016 film) be renamed and moved to Ghostbusters: Answer the Call. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Ghostbusters (2016 film) → Ghostbusters: Answer the Call – the move was discussed months ago. NeoBatfreak (talk) 07:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support per WP:SUBTITLE. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - vastly not the WP:COMMONNAME per the sources used in the article. -- Netoholic @ 21:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Also, had anything changed since this discussion Talk:Ghostbusters (2016 film)/Archive 4#Requested move 4 September 2016.--65.93.194.2 (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- C-Class Massachusetts articles
- Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- C-Class Boston articles
- Unknown-importance Boston articles
- WikiProject Boston articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- C-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- C-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Requested moves