Talk:English embroidery: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:58, 8 June 2010

English embroidery has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 8, 2010.

Textile Arts B‑class Mid‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

A fact from English embroidery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,923 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that English embroidery (example pictured) includes styles called Opus Anglicanum, stumpwork, crewel work and art needlework?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/February.

Wikipedia

Congratulations

What a fantastic article! Jasper33 (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

A clear, interesting and well documented article up to wikipedia grammar and style standards. --km5 (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{GA nominee|21:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:PKM|PKM]] ([[User talk:PKM|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=|note=}}
+{{GA|17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)|topic=|page=}}
 {{WikiProject Textile Arts
  |class=B
@@ Line 9: / Line 10: @@
 ==Congratulations==
 What a fantastic article! [[User:Jasper33|Jasper33]] ([[User talk:Jasper33|talk]]) 18:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
+==GA review==
+A clear, interesting and well documented article up to wikipedia grammar and style standards.
+--[[User:Helianthi|km5]] ([[User talk:Helianthi|talk]]) 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)