User contributions for GeeGee

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

03:4503:45, 28 September 2020 diff hist 0 m Charlie Chaplin →Awards and recognition: The section's picture description is wrong, as Chaplin did NOT receive his star in 1970, but in 1972 (most likely during his visit the same year).

17:4317:43, 26 December 2019 diff hist +12 Carl Großmann Großmann committed suicide before the end of the main trial, so there was no sentence, let alone a schedule for an execution.

16:0816:08, 20 November 2019 diff hist −102 Carl Großmann →Arrest: Factual error: Großmann hanged himself BEFORE the end of the main trial. Since the trial had ended with the death of the suspect, there was no conviction - and no punishment.
15:5615:56, 20 November 2019 diff hist +120 Carl Großmann →Early life: "It is believed the meat contained remains" is a rumor that made it into the WT article, but there was no evidence. There were also rumors (which some of the investigators tended to support) that he ate some of the remains himself. Some respected investigators also criticized the prosecutors for limiting the indictment to just a few cases, as they were convinced that Großmann had murdered way more women.
15:2015:20, 20 November 2019 diff hist 0 m Carl Großmann →Early life
15:1815:18, 20 November 2019 diff hist +326 Carl Großmann →Early life: Großmann was sentenced to 15 yrs, not 14 yrs; 2 victims: a 10-yr-old girl + a 4-yr-old girl). The German newspaper DIE WELT cited the original indictment from June 6, 1922: "„Im Jahre 1899 erhielt er vom Schwurgericht in Bayreuth 15 Jahre Zuchthaus. Er hatte ein 10-jähriges Mädchen unzüchtig berührt und an demselben Tage ein 4 1/2 jähriges Mädchen in rohester Weise vergewaltigt".
14:3114:31, 20 November 2019 diff hist +1 m Talk:Carl Großmann →"Großmann" why?
14:3014:30, 20 November 2019 diff hist +2,582 Talk:Carl Großmann →"Großmann" why?

20:4520:45, 16 July 2019 diff hist +1 Klaus Fuchs His name was Klaus Emil Julius Fuchs, as stated in the Fuchs entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.) - where the brackets (Emil and Julius) highlight his 2nd and 3rd name. In Germany, it is common not to mention additional/middle names - hence the brackets in the Oxford biography - unless the first two names are connected by a dash, eg. "Heinz-Peter".

09:5309:53, 12 July 2019 diff hist +14 Malicious Practices Act 1933 →Overview: the communists + the social democrats were the most dangerous opponents, the Catholic conservative party (Deutsche Zemtrumspartei) had resigned to the fact that the Nazis had taken power.
09:4609:46, 12 July 2019 diff hist +8 Talk:Malicious Practices Act 1933 No edit summary
09:4509:45, 12 July 2019 diff hist 0 Talk:Malicious Practices Act 1933 No edit summary
09:4409:44, 12 July 2019 diff hist +1,460 Talk:Malicious Practices Act 1933 No edit summary

13:2613:26, 3 February 2019 diff hist −3 m Conrad Murray →Michael Jackson's death: Sentence structure, typo
13:2013:20, 3 February 2019 diff hist +1,277 Conrad Murray →Michael Jackson's death: While the term "homicide" isn't wrong (technically), ppl who are less familiar with legal terms may read the umbrella term "homicide" as "murder". Murray was charged with "involuntary manslaughter", a category of homicide, just like murder, and convicted of involuntary manslaughter. I also cleaned up the timeline a bit, as it mentioned the conviction first, instead of listing the events in chron. order. Updated some source links.

08:5708:57, 26 January 2019 diff hist +16 m Saumagen →History
08:5608:56, 26 January 2019 diff hist −80 Saumagen →History: Saumagen was never made of leftovers, but of slaughter swerves, initially, before meat and ingredients of higher quality (even up to luxury ingredients - such as truffles, etc) were used.There is no proper source cited for the claim that it was meant as dish for poor ppl. It was most likely the farmers' way of processing all digestable parts of a pig (pls see "brawn").
08:2708:27, 26 January 2019 diff hist +1,352 Saumagen →History: The German sources were not processed/translated properly

04:0704:07, 11 January 2018 diff hist −1 m Talk:Böhmermann affair →The poem (and translation): while it's understandable that the subject-object word order was kept for the translation, this comma has go.

22:4022:40, 3 December 2017 diff hist +137 N User:GeeGee ←Created page with '<table style="background-color:#F3F3FF;"><tr><td align="left">Test</td> <td bg-color="F3F3FF">{{Babel|de|en-4|fr-1}} </td> </tr> </table>'
22:3122:31, 3 December 2017 diff hist +236 m Talk:Lighting →Question: Additional question