2023 Chinese balloon incident: Difference between revisions
→Background: correct for possible original research issue |
→Background: restore version containing talk improvements, after Restflux ban. |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
The use of balloons as military technology dates to the late 18th century and peaked during World War I. The United States and the [[Soviet Union]] continued to use them for reconnaissance during the [[Cold War]].<ref name="TimeFeb3">{{cite magazine |last=De Guzman |first=Chad |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why Is China Allegedly Using a Spy Balloon When It Has a Global Satellite Network? |url=https://time.com/6252673/chinese-spy-balloon-satellite/ |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-date=February 3, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230203165707/https://time.com/6252673/chinese-spy-balloon-satellite/ |url-status=live |url-access=limited}}</ref> Despite being mostly obsoleted by [[Reconnaissance satellite|surveillance satellite]]s and [[Unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aerial vehicle|drone]]s, balloons have retained some advantages, such as a lower cost of production and deployment.<ref name="TimeFeb3" /><ref name="BBCFeb3">{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kelly |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why would China use a spy balloon when it has satellites? |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204120702/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
The use of balloons as military technology dates to the late 18th century and peaked during World War I. The United States and the [[Soviet Union]] continued to use them for reconnaissance during the [[Cold War]].<ref name="TimeFeb3">{{cite magazine |last=De Guzman |first=Chad |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why Is China Allegedly Using a Spy Balloon When It Has a Global Satellite Network? |url=https://time.com/6252673/chinese-spy-balloon-satellite/ |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-date=February 3, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230203165707/https://time.com/6252673/chinese-spy-balloon-satellite/ |url-status=live |url-access=limited}}</ref> Despite being mostly obsoleted by [[Reconnaissance satellite|surveillance satellite]]s and [[Unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aerial vehicle|drone]]s, balloons have retained some advantages, such as a lower cost of production and deployment.<ref name="TimeFeb3" /><ref name="BBCFeb3">{{cite news |last1=Ng |first1=Kelly |date=February 3, 2023 |title=Why would China use a spy balloon when it has satellites? |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |access-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204120702/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64508086 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
In 2019, the [[U.S. Department of Defense]] increased investment in |
In 2019, the [[U.S. Department of Defense]] increased investment in high-altitude balloons with COLD STAR (Covert Long Dwell Stratospheric Architecture), a spy balloon that can lurk undetected in enemy airspace.<ref>https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a38005873/pentagon-balloons-strattolite/</ref> The balloons have autonomous navigation, high fidelity sensors, and on-board AI that can be incorporated into the military [[kill chain]] as a complement to [[Space Development Agency|satellite-based systems]].<ref name="popmech">{{cite news |last=Hambling |first=David |date=November 11, 2021 |title=Why These Badass Balloons Are the Pentagon's New Secret Weapon |work=[[Popular Mechanics]] |url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a38005873/pentagon-balloons-strattolite/ |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206021728/https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a38005873/pentagon-balloons-strattolite/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="politico">{{cite news |last=Hudson |first=Lee |date=July 5, 2022 |title=U.S. military's newest weapon against China and Russia: Hot air |work=[[Politico]] |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/05/u-s-militarys-newest-weapon-against-china-and-russia-hot-air-00043860 |access-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-date=February 4, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230204220559/https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/05/u-s-militarys-newest-weapon-against-china-and-russia-hot-air-00043860 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2021/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_Vol3_OSD_RDTE_PB21_Justification_Book.pdf Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221220202454/https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2021/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_Vol3_OSD_RDTE_PB21_Justification_Book.pdf|date=December 20, 2022}}. [[United States Department of Defense]]. Retrieved February 6, 2023.</ref> |
||
In 2022, the [[U.S. Army Pacific Command]] sought to "operationalize the stratosphere" with [[ISTAR|persistent surveillance]] using balloons "the size of a college football stadium." Made of a polyethylene plastic and having minimal heat signature, the balloons are hard to detect while they loiter for days capturing 5-cm resolution imagery.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2022/07/way-up-in-the-air-world-view-looks-to-expand-customer-base-for-its-stratollite-balloon/|title=Way up in the air: World View looks to expand customer base for its 'Stratollite' balloon|first=Theresa|last=Hitchens|date=July 28, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
====Technology used by China==== |
|||
Soon after, Chinese officials and scientists highlighted the usefulness of balloons for their own civilian and military capacities.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Buckley |first1=Chris |date=February 13, 2023 |title=China's Top Airship Scientist Promoted Program to Watch the World From Above |work=[[The New York Times]] |agency= |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/13/world/asia/china-spy-balloon.html |url-access=limited}}</ref><ref name="Reuters">{{cite news |last1=Baptista |first1=Eduardo |last2=Torode |first2=Greg |date=February 6, 2023 |title=China's military has shown growing interest in high-altitude balloons |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-has-shown-growing-interest-high-altitude-balloons-2023-02-06/ |url-status=live |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206235821/https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-military-has-shown-growing-interest-high-altitude-balloons-2023-02-06/ |archive-date=February 6, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=February 7, 2023 |title=April 2022 Paper By China's People's Liberation Army: Military Can Use Balloons To Test Enemy Air Defenses; Following U.S. Downing Of Spy Balloon, Chinese Government Media Confirmed This |publisher=[[Middle East Media Research Institute]] |issue=10471 |url=https://www.memri.org/reports/april-2022-paper-chinas-peoples-liberation-army-military-can-use-balloons-test-enemy-air |url-status=live |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209001719/https://www.memri.org/reports/april-2022-paper-chinas-peoples-liberation-army-military-can-use-balloons-test-enemy-air |archive-date=February 9, 2023}}</ref> In 2022, the [[Chinese Academy of Sciences]] publicly disclosed pictures of their stratospheric balloon carrying a 1.2 ton payload, but said it was meant to carry scientific instruments.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/research_news/earth/202210/t20221027_322332.shtml|title=AIR Lofts Heavy Payload Balloon into Near-space Height----Chinese Academy of Sciences|website=english.cas.cn}}</ref> Other Chinese military publications suggested that balloons could be used to induce an enemy's air defense systems as well as a means of enhancing domestic air defense.<ref name="Reuters" /><ref>{{cite news |date=February 7, 2023 |title=April 2022 Paper By China's People's Liberation Army: Military Can Use Balloons To Test Enemy Air Defenses; Following U.S. Downing Of Spy Balloon, Chinese Government Media Confirmed This |publisher=[[Middle East Media Research Institute]] |issue=10471 |url=https://www.memri.org/reports/april-2022-paper-chinas-peoples-liberation-army-military-can-use-balloons-test-enemy-air |url-status=live |access-date=February 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209001719/https://www.memri.org/reports/april-2022-paper-chinas-peoples-liberation-army-military-can-use-balloons-test-enemy-air |archive-date=February 9, 2023}}</ref> The 2023 balloon is believed to be manufactured by a civilian Chinese defense contractor.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lee |first1=Matthew |last2=Tucker |first2=Eric |date=February 9, 2023 |title=US says Chinese military behind vast aerial spy program |language=en |publisher=[[Associated Press]] |url=https://apnews.com/article/chinese-balloon-military-involvement-e45c759cb00294e83989fa35970935bc |url-status=live |access-date=February 10, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209150130/https://apnews.com/article/chinese-balloon-military-involvement-e45c759cb00294e83989fa35970935bc |archive-date=February 9, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
===U.S.–China tensions=== |
===U.S.–China tensions=== |
Revision as of 06:07, 18 February 2023
It has been suggested that this article be merged with 2023 Alaska high-altitude object, 2023 Yukon high-altitude object and 2023 Lake Huron high-altitude object. (Discuss) Proposed since February 2023. |
Date | January 28 – February 4, 2023 |
---|---|
Location | Airspace over the United States, Canada, and territorial waters |
Type | Airspace violation; diplomatic incident |
Cause | High-altitude Chinese balloons entering foreign airspace |
Motive | United States and Canada allege reconnaissance; China claims meteorology and force majeure due to westerlies |
Participants | U.S. and Canada: |
Outcome | Balloon downed by an AIM-9 Sidewinder fired by a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor; debris recovered[4] |
From January 28 to February 4, 2023, a Chinese-operated high-altitude balloon was seen in North American airspace, including Alaska, western Canada, and the contiguous United States.[5] On February 4, the U.S. Air Force shot down the balloon over U.S. territorial waters off the coast of South Carolina, on the order of U.S. President Joe Biden.[6][7][8] Debris from the wreckage was recovered and sent to an FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for analysis.[4]
The American and Canadian militaries announced that the balloon was for surveillance, while the Chinese government maintained it was a civilian meteorological research airship that had blown off course.[9] Specifically, the U.S. said that the balloon was capable of geolocating electronic communications and carried intelligence surveillance equipment inconsistent with that of a weather balloon.[10] It later added that similar Chinese spy balloons have flown over more than 40 nations.[11][10] Analysts said that the flight path and structural characteristics of the balloon were dissimilar from those typically used for meteorological research.[12][13][14]
The incident increased U.S.–China tensions and prompted U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to delay a diplomatic visit to Beijing, which was set to be his first since 2018.[15][16][17] The incident also increased Canada–China tensions as Canada summoned the Chinese ambassador over the violation of Canadian airspace.[18] On February 3, the U.S. Department of Defense announced that a second Chinese balloon was passing over Latin America, and that China confirmed ownership of this balloon.[19][20][21] The news was followed by subsequent detections and shootdowns of high-altitude objects over Northern Alaska (February 10),[22] Yukon (February 11),[23] and Lake Huron (February 11–12).[24]
Background
Spy balloon history and technology
The use of balloons as military technology dates to the late 18th century and peaked during World War I. The United States and the Soviet Union continued to use them for reconnaissance during the Cold War.[25] Despite being mostly obsoleted by surveillance satellites and drones, balloons have retained some advantages, such as a lower cost of production and deployment.[25][26]
In 2019, the U.S. Department of Defense increased investment in high-altitude balloons with COLD STAR (Covert Long Dwell Stratospheric Architecture), a spy balloon that can lurk undetected in enemy airspace.[27] The balloons have autonomous navigation, high fidelity sensors, and on-board AI that can be incorporated into the military kill chain as a complement to satellite-based systems.[28][29][30]
In 2022, the U.S. Army Pacific Command sought to "operationalize the stratosphere" with persistent surveillance using balloons "the size of a college football stadium." Made of a polyethylene plastic and having minimal heat signature, the balloons are hard to detect while they loiter for days capturing 5-cm resolution imagery.[31]
Soon after, Chinese officials and scientists highlighted the usefulness of balloons for their own civilian and military capacities.[32][33][34] In 2022, the Chinese Academy of Sciences publicly disclosed pictures of their stratospheric balloon carrying a 1.2 ton payload, but said it was meant to carry scientific instruments.[35] Other Chinese military publications suggested that balloons could be used to induce an enemy's air defense systems as well as a means of enhancing domestic air defense.[33][36] The 2023 balloon is believed to be manufactured by a civilian Chinese defense contractor.[37]
U.S.–China tensions
The 2023 balloon incident occurred while U.S.–China relations were at their lowest point in decades,[10] following suspected incidents of Chinese espionage[a] and amid increasing strategic competition in military and economic sectors.[38] In 2022, the U.S. and its allies imposed stringent export controls on "foundational technologies" (including advanced semiconductor chips) to China with the official aim of inhibiting any Chinese military buildup.[10] The Biden administration has also sought to maintain critical supply chains independent from China.[10]
Previous unidentified objects and suspected Chinese balloons
On February 9, 2023, the U.S. Department of State said that the balloon was part of a fleet of Chinese military surveillance balloons that had flown over more than forty countries, and across five continents, including Latin America and Europe.[10][11][39]
This was the fifth detected Chinese balloon over the continental United States since 2017.[40][41] Prior incursions suspected of surveillance activity had entered U.S. airspace over Florida, Guam, and Hawaii.[42][43][15] One occurred earlier during Biden's presidency (2021–present)[15][7] and three occurred during Donald Trump's presidency (2017–2021).[15][7][44] They did not persist as long as the 2023 incident, and China was able to recover those balloons.[7]
Other pre-2023 incursions have remained unexplained, classified by U.S. authorities as unidentified anomalous phenomena. Many were handed to the Defense Department task force responsible for investigating such events.[45] The commander of United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), General Glen VanHerck, said that the U.S. failure to detect and identify all such incursions was "a domain awareness gap that we have to figure out".[46][47][48]
In 2020 and 2021, similar balloons were sighted in Sendai and Hachinohe, Japan respectively, but they were not identified as of Chinese origin at the time.[49][50]
In February 2022, several balloons were spotted off the coast of Taiwan, which their Ministry of National Defense said likely were for meteorological observations for the PLA's Eastern Theater Command and posed no immediate security threat.[51]
Incident
Balloon
Size, propulsion, and payload
The balloon carried an underslung payload described as a "technology bay" estimated to be the size of "two or three school buses"[b] and was powered by sixteen solar arrays mounted on the payload. The balloon was 200 feet (61 m) tall according to U.S. General Glen D. VanHerck.[53] USNORTHCOM and NORAD Commander, General Glen VanHerck, estimated the payload weighed over 2,000 pounds (910 kg).[48]
National Security Council spokesman Admiral John Kirby said the craft had a propeller and could be maneuvered.[54] U.S. officials told foreign diplomats in Beijing that the craft had rudders and propellers.[55] A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said it had "limited self-steering capability".[56]
The U.S. Department of Defense said the balloon did not present a military or physical threat to people on the ground while it remained in the air, and that shooting it down over water would be safer and increased the opportunity to study the wreckage for intelligence purposes.[57][58][59]
Signals intelligence capabilities
Images from U-2 flybys and forensic analysis of the payload showed antennas that likely were used for collecting and transmitting signals intelligence.[60][61] A publicly released U.S. State Department document, after the balloon was downed and debris collected, said that the balloon's solar arrays produced sufficient power to run "multiple active intelligence collection sensors" and that the antennas on the balloon could collect and geolocate communications, including radio and mobile phone signals, but it was unclear if any specific devices were targets.[10] U.S. authorities identified the manufacturer of the balloon with high confidence as a company with direct ties to the People's Liberation Army. U.S. officials cited this as an example of military-civil fusion, in which Chinese civilian enterprises are highly integrated into China's military structure.[10]
Experts noted differences between the Chinese balloon and conventional weather balloons.[12][13] Standard weather balloons have typically been around 20 feet (6 m) wide, less than a quarter of the Chinese balloon's diameter.[13] Although weather sensors have become more sophisticated over time, their instrumental suites have remained relatively unchanged since the 1970s and 1980s, and have been consistent globally.[13] Experts interviewed by the BBC said it was unusual for weather balloons to last as long as the one involved in the incident and that the balloon "might have been more sophisticated than China claims".[14]
Former U.S. Air Force General and NORAD official Charles "Tuna" Moore said that the Chinese surveillance technology on the balloon was inconsistent with meteorological missions. He said that the Chinese would likely be interested in collecting emissions or signals from various radar, weapons, and communications systems to try to detect vulnerabilities in the defenses of the U.S. and its allies.[11]
Detection
External videos | |
---|---|
Defense Department Briefing, February 3, 2023, C-SPAN[62] |
High-altitude (stratospheric) balloons are extremely difficult to detect. A 2005 study by the U.S. Air Force (USAF)'s Air University states surveillance balloons often present very small radar cross-sections, "on the order of hundredths of a square meter, about the same as a small bird", and essentially no infrared signature, which complicates the use of anti-aircraft weapons.[58][63] A 2009 research paper by a USAF officer found that such aircraft "are inherently stealthy" because of a tiny infrared signature at high altitude (attributable to the balloon's inert gas which produces very low heat emissions) and because of the difficulty of radar detection (as the balloons lack sharp edges and metal structures).[64]
The balloon's first reported sighting was on February 1, 2023, when civilians on a commercial airliner spotted it.[65] On the same day, former Billings Gazette editor Chase Doak[66] spotted the object above Billings, Montana, after seeing reports that the airspace around Billings was closed. He had initially assumed it was a star or a UFO.[3] Doak contacted his friend and Billings Gazette photographer Larry Mayer,[67] and the two photographed the balloon using telephoto lenses. Mayer also sent the images to various government agencies.[67] After the photographs were published in the Billings Gazette and received widespread media coverage, the U.S. Department of Defense and the Canadian Department of National Defence announced on February 2 that NORAD was aware of a high-altitude surveillance balloon believed to belong to China and had been tracking it for "several" days.[68][69] The balloon was flying at an altitude of 60,000 feet (18,000 m) over Billings at the time.[57]
American defense officials considered shooting the balloon down but initially decided not to due to the risk of debris injuring civilians on the ground.[70] A meeting was convened between Secretary of Defense Austin, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley, NORTHCOM/NORAD Commander General VanHerck, and other military commanders.[68] Biden was advised by officials not to shoot it down because debris could threaten civilians or cause property damage.[68]
Flight path
The balloon entered U.S. airspace above the Aleutian Islands on January 28, 2023, then moved across Alaska, and entered Canadian airspace over the Yukon and Northwest Territories on January 30, 2023.[15] After flying southeast over British Columbia, the balloon then crossed into the U.S. in northern Idaho on January 31, and Montana on February 1,[15] where it was spotted over Billings.[69][57] Montana is the location of multiple nuclear missile installations, including Malmstrom Air Force Base, one of three U.S. Air Force bases from which intercontinental ballistic missiles are operated, raising suspicions that the balloon had been launched to surveil said nuclear installations.[69] A meteorological researcher calculated a possible trajectory along this path using the HYSPLIT atmospheric model, consistent with data on prevailing westerlies from China to Montana.[71] The balloon was spotted above northwest Missouri, near Kansas City, on February 3.[57]
An unnamed U.S. defense official told The Washington Post that the balloon was not a derelict object as it generally followed jet stream patterns but loitered when it was near sensitive sites, such as the Malmstrom AFB.[72] The Post said that that observation undermined Chinese assertions that the balloon was a wayward device.[72] The U.S. ground-based intercontinental nuclear arsenal is composed of about 400 LGM-30 Minuteman III missiles deployed in missile silos around Malmstrom AFB, Montana; Minot AFB, North Dakota; and Francis E. Warren AFB, Wyoming.[73] Experts interviewed by Time said that the balloon traveled at a much longer distance than what would be expected of a standard weather balloon and that Chinese officials should not have been surprised that the balloon would have eventually either crossed the U.S. or faced detection.[13]
The balloon was flying at an altitude of 60,000 feet (18,000 m). In comparison, the Concorde was the only commercial airliner to fly at 60,000 feet (18,000 m). Business jets can reach 51,000 feet (16,000 m), current commercial airliners can reach 45,000 feet (14,000 m), and the SR-71 had reached 90,000 feet (27,000 m).[74]
U.S. monitoring and counterintelligence
During the incident, a U.S. defense official stated that the balloon had "limited additive value from an intelligence collection perspective". Nonetheless, the Pentagon took steps to protect its assets from leaking sensitive information to the balloon.[75] U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said the U.S. military was able to collect valuable intelligence on the balloon while it was transiting North America.[25][76] VanHerck said that the U.S. Department of Defense obtained special authorization to collect intelligence against the balloon within the U.S.[47]
The balloon was monitored by crewed aircraft deployed by NORAD, including a Boeing E-3 Sentry Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AWACS), a Boeing RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft from Nellis Air Force Base,[70] and a F-22 Raptor from Langley Air Force Base.[77] The U.S. Department of Defense said that, during the balloon's overflight of the United States, it had blocked the balloon from gathering intelligence and was able to study the balloon and its equipment.[59][78]
A U.S. government official said that at least two U-2S reconnaissance aircraft were used to gather data on the balloon while it was over the Midwest, though it was not clear at which points in the balloon's flight it was tracked by U-2S aircraft.[47] The War Zone commented that the U-2S's high flight ceiling, exceeding 70,000 feet (21,000 m), allowed it to observe the balloon from within relatively close proximity (including from above), and its electronic warfare suite allowed the aircraft to jam or monitor radio emissions from the balloon, including data transmissions directed upwards towards Chinese communications satellites.[47]
Downing
External video | |
---|---|
High-definition video of the shootdown |
On February 4, the balloon drifted to the Carolinas.[79] The Federal Aviation Administration closed airspace over the area in one of the largest temporary flight restrictions in U.S. history, "more than five times the restricted airspace surrounding Washington, D.C., and nearly double the area of the state of Massachusetts".[80] A ground stop was ordered on the coast at Myrtle Beach International Airport and Charleston International Airport in South Carolina, and Wilmington International Airport in North Carolina.[81][82][83] Military aircraft were reported to be over the Carolinas.[84] U.S. officials later stated that this was in preparation for the eventual downing of the balloon within American territorial waters over the Atlantic.[15]
The balloon was shot down off the coast of Surfside Beach, South Carolina, at an altitude of 58,000 feet (18,000 m) by an AIM-9X Sidewinder fired from a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor that had departed from Langley Air Force Base; the downing occurred at 2:39 p.m. eastern time.[7][85][8] The downing was the first recorded by a F-22 and the first of an aircraft over U.S. territory since World War II.[86]
Debris recovery
Debris from the balloon was dispersed over an area of 2.25 square kilometres (0.87 sq mi),[87] where the ocean was about 47 feet (14 m) deep and collection efforts were initiated for further inspection.[88][59] VanHerck said the United States Navy was conducting recovery operations while the U.S. Coast Guard was securing the region where the debris fell.[89] Guided-missile destroyer USS Oscar Austin, guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea, and dock landing ship USS Carter Hall were tasked with retrieving the balloon wreckage, alongside Coast Guard cutters and helicopters, U.S. Navy divers, and FBI counterintelligence agents.[90][91][92] General VanHerck stated that unmanned underwater vehicles controlled from rigid inflatable boats used side-scan sonar to locate the sunken debris. The unmanned vehicles analyzed the wreckage to identify potential threats to recovery divers, such as explosives or batteries with hazardous materials.[48] The sunken payload was estimated to weigh more than 2,000 pounds (910 kg).[48]
On February 6, some of the downed payload was sent to the FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for forensic analysis by the Bureau's Operational Technology Division.[4][94] Possible balloon debris was spotted later on the South Carolina coast, where police were asking residents to report other sightings.[95] China said it wanted the wreckage returned,[96][97] but the U.S. said it had no plans to do so.[4]
By February 13, the U.S. had recovered a significant portion of the balloon's payload off the South Carolina coast. The payload measured 30 feet (9.1 m) and had all of the craft's tech gear and antennas.[98][99] NORTHCOM said: "Recovery operations near South Carolina continue. Crews have been able to recover significant debris from the site, including all of the priority sensor and electronics pieces identified as well as large sections of the structure. Weather permitted crane operations at the site late last week. Due to weather today, underwater recovery activities are limited but will resume as conditions permit."[99][98]
On February 17, the U.S. military said that recovery operations have concluded for the balloon after final debris were located and retrieved.[100]
Response and reactions
United States
Federal government
Secretary of State Blinken postponed a scheduled diplomatic trip to China in response, which would have been the first such visit since 2018.[9][16][17] The White House did not want to announce the balloon's incursion to protect Blinken's trip, but press and social media interest made Pentagon officials comment.[66]
In response to questions regarding the situation, on February 4, Biden said, "We're going to take care of it."[101] Later that day, U.S. officials disclosed that three days earlier he had granted permission to down the balloon.[15]
Pentagon officials stated that there was no earlier opportunity to shoot down over water, rebutting Trump and other Republicans who criticized the Biden administration for not shooting down the balloon earlier.[59][102] Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer added: "The bottom line here is that shooting down the balloon over water wasn't just the safest option, but it was the one that maximized our intel gain."[103]
On February 6, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman briefed 150 diplomats from about 40 embassies on China's balloon surveillance program,[104] said by U.S. officials to have been run for several years by the People's Liberation Army from Hainan on China's south coast, as part of an effort to "name and shame" Chinese espionage by publicly calling it out[105] Officials are separately reaching out to countries where they say there have been at least two dozen such overflights since 2018, including Japan, India, Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines in addition to North and South America.[105][94]
The U.S. House Armed Services Committee held a February 7 hearing on wide-ranging Chinese military and intelligence threats including the balloon incursions.[106] Committee chair Republican Mike Rogers characterized the balloon as an intentionally calculated show of force.[107] A U.S. official told The Washington Post there was no sense that the balloon was a deliberate provocation, as it was part of an ongoing global surveillance program.[105] The U.S. House of Representatives voted 419–0 to adopt a resolution condemning China for the incident.[108][109]
Trump called reports of intrusions during his administration "fake disinformation";[45] and his ex-top national security officials said they were unaware of any balloon incursions during their tenure.[110] Biden administration National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said that improved airspace surveillance ordered by Biden after he took office had detected the previous incursions and "enhanced our capacity to be able to detect things that the Trump administration was unable to detect".[111]
On February 10, the U.S. added six entities accused of being associated with China's balloon surveillance program to the U.S. Commerce Department Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List, a U.S. exports blacklist. They are: Beijing Nanjiang Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd.; China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 48th Research Institute; Dongguan Lingkong Remote Sensing Technology Co., Ltd.; Eagles Men Aviation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. (EMAST); Guangzhou Tian-Hai-Xiang Aviation Technology Co., Ltd.; and Shanxi Eagles Men Aviation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.[112][113][114]
On February 14, intelligence officials began to explore the possibility that the balloon had not been intended to penetrate U.S. airspace and transit the continental United States but that Chinese authorities had instead sought to engage in more typical surveillance activities near Guam before the balloon potentially became blown off course. These discussions suggested that the international incident caused by the balloon's cross-continental transit may have been partly the result of an accident.[115][116]
Canada
Canadian officials and Global Affairs Canada summoned the Chinese Ambassador to Canada, Cong Peiwu, to Ottawa while the Department of National Defence announced it was monitoring the situation alongside the United States through NORAD.[18][117] A statement from the Canadian Armed Forces said there was no threat to Canadians, and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mélanie Joly would remain in contact with Blinken.[118]
China
On February 3, spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mao Ning said: "It is a civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological, purposes. Affected by the Westerlies and with limited self-steering capability, the airship deviated far from its planned course."[17] She said China regretted the unintentional incident, citing force majeure.[119] On February 6, Mao said that the U.S. "hyped up the incident on purpose and even used force to attack", and called the shoot down "an unacceptable and irresponsible action".[120]
Following the downing on February 5, Vice Foreign Minister Xie Feng said he had filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Embassy in response to the incident. Xie accused the United States of indiscriminately using force against the civilian airship that was about to leave U.S. airspace in violation of "the spirit of international law and international practice" and said that the Chinese government reserved the right to "take further necessary responses".[15][120] On February 6, a Chinese diplomat said in an interview with French news network LCI that the United States should return the recovered balloon debris to China.[121]
The incident coincided in timing with the release of science fiction film The Wandering Earth 2 in mainland China, causing some netizens and media to jokingly refer to the incident as "The Wandering Balloon".[122][c]
On February 12, Chinese authorities said that they had discovered an unidentified flying object near the Yellow Sea off eastern Shandong, and were preparing to shoot it down.[123]
On February 13, Chinese Foreign Affairs spokesperson Wang Wenbin said that the U.S. high-altitude balloons had "illegally crossed China's airspace" more than ten times since 2022 and also accused the U.S. of carrying out reconnaissance against China and wiretapping against targets around the world.[124] The U.S. denied China's surveillance balloons claim and, according to CNN, Wang's accusation was made without evidence.[124][125]
NATO
NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said the balloon "confirms a pattern of Chinese behavior where we see that China has invested heavily in new capabilities, including different types of surveillance and intelligence platforms", and that it presents security challenges for the members of the alliance.[126]
Other countries
Amidst the ongoing Australia–China trade war, Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong said: "I believe the US has managed this as carefully as possible. They brought the balloon down over their own territorial waters."[127][128][129]
Venezuela's foreign ministry condemned the United States for shooting down what they stated was an unmanned civilian aircraft which posed no threat.[130][131]
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stated on February 13 that the United Kingdom's government would do "whatever it takes" to defend the country from observation balloons. He added that the Royal Air Force had placed Typhoon jets on stand-by.[132] Furthermore, ex-MI6 chief Sir Alex Younger, said that due to the systematic nature of China's surveillance program, the UK must "wake up" to China's threat to global security.[133]
Media reactions
Analysis
Michael Clarke, a British defense analyst, said that China wanted to be 'noticed' with the balloon. He suggested that the spy balloon fly-over was a response to an agreement signed by the United States and the Philippines on February 2, 2023, which allowed the US military access to four more military bases in the Philippines as part of a joint pushback against what Clarke called China's illegal nine dash line claims to the South China Sea.[134]
John Blaxland, a professor of international security and intelligence studies at the Australian National University, said that the Chinese likely expected the balloon to be detected, and he further suggested that the balloon being detected was the goal. Blaxland believes that one of the reasons the balloon was launched, was to embarrass the US, with intelligence gathering being a secondary objective.[135] He also said that the balloon could be designed to test the resolve of Washington as well as gather information about American detection capabilities and reaction.[136]
On the shooting of the balloon, Christopher Twomey, a security scholar, said that any Chinese response would be restrained and that China would want to "sweep this under the rug" and emphasize senior-level visits within months.[137] The Washington Post columnist Ishaan Tharoor contextualized the incident as part of Cold War II.[138]
Gregory Falco, an aerospace security expert at the Johns Hopkins University, commented on the surveillance balloon's technology. He said that the balloon was part of "China's hybrid communications architecture" that relays surveillance data to satellites in Low Earth Orbit and back to Chinese ground stations.[139] He also said that the large solar panels, antenna and the navigation capabilities of the balloon indicated it was indeed engaged for surveillance and not weather data collection.[140][141]
Satire
The incident was satirized in the cold open of the show Saturday Night Live the evening after it was shot down.[142] In the sketch, performer Bowen Yang portrayed an anthropomorphized depiction of the downed balloon being interviewed by MSNBC journalist Katy Tur (played by Chloe Fineman).[143] Some sources paid particular attention to Yang's line, "Congrats! You shot a balloon!", with USA Today using it in the headline of its coverage.[144] YouTube duo Josh Pieters and Archie Manners would launch a weather balloon with a camera towards the Chinese Embassy in London to spy on China since embassies are legally part of the guest country.
Further incursions and responses
On February 3, the U.S. Department of Defense stated that a second Chinese surveillance balloon had been detected, this one flying over Latin America.[20][21] The Costa Rican General Directorate of Civil Aviation confirmed the incursion by an object "not of Costa Rican origin" that locals had first seen on February 2.[145] The Colombian Air Force said that on the morning of February 3, it had detected an object with "characteristics similar to those of a balloon" at a height of 55,000 feet (17,000 m) and traveling at a speed of 25 knots (46 kilometres per hour; 29 miles per hour), and after determining it was not a threat to national security and defense or to air safety, had continued to track it until it left Colombian airspace.[131][146] Sightings of the balloon were also reported from Venezuela,[147] specifically from Maracaibo.[148] On February 6, Mao Ning, the spokeswoman for the Chinese government, confirmed the balloon belongs to China, but said that it was used for "flight tests" and was blown off-course in much the same manner as the one spotted over North America.[149][19]
On February 10, another high-altitude object was shot down on the vicinity of Deadhorse, Alaska, over the Beaufort Sea;[150] recovery efforts by the Alaska National Guard on the sea ice are on-going.
On February 11, on previous orders of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a "small, cylindrical object" was shot down over the Yukon Territory for violating Canadian air space; both U.S. and Canadian aircraft had scrambled, and a U.S. F-22 jet fighter made the kill.[151]
On February 12, the US military shot down a fourth unidentified object over Lake Huron, within the maritime territory of Michigan.[152][153]
On February 14, the US government announced that the latter three high-altitude objects shot down over the North America were likely private entities with no relations to China. Further analysis and debris collections were underway.[154]
See also
- 1960 U-2 incident
- 2023 Alaska high-altitude object
- 2023 Lake Huron high-altitude object
- 2023 Yukon high-altitude object
- Balloon buster
- Fu-Go balloon bomb
- Hainan Island incident
- List of high-altitude object events in 2023
- Project Genetrix
Notes
- ^ the New York Times article cites the Office of Personnel Management data breach, the Anthem medical data breach, and a Marriott International data breach as examples.
- ^ Sources citing the defense official who gave the estimate did not identify what size of a bus was referenced. Lengths of U.S. school buses vary but are limited to 45 feet (14 m) per specifications defined by the National Congress on School Transportation.[52]
- ^ The Chinese name for "The Wandering Balloon" (流浪气球, Liúlàng Qìqiú) is a pun on the Chinese name for "The Wandering Earth" (流浪地球, Liúlàng Dìqiú).
References
- ^ Doak, Chase. I thought it was a UFO. Turns out, it was a Chinese spy balloon. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023 – via YouTube.
- ^ Szpaller, Keila (February 6, 2023). "Billings photojournalists recall seeing balloon before it was identified, shot down". Daily Montanan. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b Nur-Azna, Sanusi (February 3, 2023). "Spy balloon witness thought it might have been a star or UFO". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Sevastopulo, Demetri (February 7, 2023). "US says it does not plan to return spy balloon debris to China". Financial Times. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese spy balloon over US is weather device says Beijing". BBC News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Brown, Matthew; Pollard, James (February 5, 2023). "Eyes on the sky as Chinese balloon shot down over Atlantic". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e Baldor, Lolita C.; Copp, Tara (February 4, 2023). "China balloon: Many questions about suspected spy in the sky". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b Hill, Randall; Stewart, Phil; Mason, Jeff (February 4, 2023). "U.S. fighter jet shoots down suspected Chinese spy balloon". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Lee, Matthew (February 4, 2023). "Chinese balloon soars across US; Blinken scraps Beijing trip". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Wong, Edward; Barnes, Julian E. (February 9, 2023). "Chinese Balloon Had Tools to Collect Electronic Communications, U.S. Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b c Hudson, John; Nakashima, Ellen; Lamothe, Dan (February 9, 2023). "U.S. declassifies balloon intelligence, calls out China for spying". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b Bushwick, Sophie (February 3, 2023). "Chinese Spy Balloon Has Unexpected Maneuverability". Scientific American. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
This maneuverability is beyond the capabilities of most high-altitude balloons, says John Villasenor, director of the Institute for Technology, Law and Policy and a professor of electrical engineering, law, public policy and management at the University of California, Los Angeles.
- ^ a b c d e Kohli, Anisha (February 4, 2023). "The Chinese Balloon Looks Nothing Like a Weather Balloon". Time. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b "China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims?". BBC News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Miller, Zeke; Balsamo, Michael; Long, Colleen; Madhani, Aamer; Baldor, Lolita C. (February 5, 2023). "US downs Chinese balloon, drawing a threat from China". AP News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Cadell, Cate; Hudson, John; Abutaleb, Yasmeen. "Blinken postpones China trip as suspected spy balloon detected over U.S.". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b c Hansler, Jennifer; Liptak, Kevin; Herb, Jeremy; Atwood, Kylie; Sciutto, Kylie; Liebermann, Oren (February 3, 2023). "Blinken postpones trip to Beijing after Chinese spy balloon spotted over US, officials say". CNN. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b "Ottawa tight-lipped on details as Canada, U.S. call out China over balloon". CTV News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b "Second balloon over Latin America is ours – China". BBC News. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b "Pentagon: Another Chinese Balloon Spotted Over Latin America". Voice of America. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ a b Gregorian, Dareh; Kube, Courtney; Gains, Mosheh; Richards, Zoë. "Another Chinese 'surveillance balloon' is flying over Latin America, Pentagon says". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Cooper, Helene; Barnes, Julian E.; Wong, Edward (February 10, 2023). "U.S. Shoots Down High-Altitude Object Over Alaska". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- ^ Newton, Paula (February 11, 2023). "NORAD says additional 'object' detected over northern Canada". CNN. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- ^ Stewart, Phil; Shalal, Andrea; Stewart, Phil (February 13, 2023). "U.S. military brings down flying object over Lake Huron". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ a b c De Guzman, Chad (February 3, 2023). "Why Is China Allegedly Using a Spy Balloon When It Has a Global Satellite Network?". Time. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Ng, Kelly (February 3, 2023). "Why would China use a spy balloon when it has satellites?". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a38005873/pentagon-balloons-strattolite/
- ^ Hambling, David (November 11, 2021). "Why These Badass Balloons Are the Pentagon's New Secret Weapon". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Hudson, Lee (July 5, 2022). "U.S. military's newest weapon against China and Russia: Hot air". Politico. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates Archived December 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. United States Department of Defense. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Hitchens, Theresa (July 28, 2022). "Way up in the air: World View looks to expand customer base for its 'Stratollite' balloon".
- ^ Buckley, Chris (February 13, 2023). "China's Top Airship Scientist Promoted Program to Watch the World From Above". The New York Times.
- ^ a b Baptista, Eduardo; Torode, Greg (February 6, 2023). "China's military has shown growing interest in high-altitude balloons". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "April 2022 Paper By China's People's Liberation Army: Military Can Use Balloons To Test Enemy Air Defenses; Following U.S. Downing Of Spy Balloon, Chinese Government Media Confirmed This". No. 10471. Middle East Media Research Institute. February 7, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "AIR Lofts Heavy Payload Balloon into Near-space Height----Chinese Academy of Sciences". english.cas.cn.
- ^ "April 2022 Paper By China's People's Liberation Army: Military Can Use Balloons To Test Enemy Air Defenses; Following U.S. Downing Of Spy Balloon, Chinese Government Media Confirmed This". No. 10471. Middle East Media Research Institute. February 7, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Lee, Matthew; Tucker, Eric (February 9, 2023). "US says Chinese military behind vast aerial spy program". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Sanger, David E. (February 5, 2023). "Balloon Incident Reveals More Than Spying as Competition With China Intensifies". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Bredemeier, Ken; Farivar, Masood (February 9, 2023). "US: Chinese Military Likely at Center of Balloon-Spying Operation". Voice of America. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Wilkie, Christina (February 6, 2023). "Chinese spy balloon fallout roils Washington and Beijing". CNBC. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Stewart, Phil; Ali, Idrees; Stewart, Phil; Ali, Idrees (February 6, 2023). "U.S. failed to detect past Chinese spy balloons, Air Force general says". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Biden says U.S. will "take care of" suspected Chinese spy balloon". CBS News. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Raddatz, Martha; Martinez, Luis; Yiu, Karson. "Large Chinese reconnaissance balloon spotted over the US, officials say". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ Neukam, Stephen (February 5, 2023). "Chinese balloons flew over US three times during Trump administration: officials". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Barnes, Julian E.; Cooper, Helene; Wong, Edward (February 7, 2023). "Previous Chinese Balloon Incursions Initially Went Undetected". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Ashley Roque, Other Chinese balloons slipped through 'domain awareness gap' in US defenses: General Archived February 9, 2023, at the Wayback Machine, Breaking Defense (February 6, 2023).
- ^ a b c d Trevithick, Joseph; Rogoway, Tyler (February 6, 2023). "U-2 Spy Planes Snooped On Chinese Surveillance Balloon". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c d "Gen. Glen VanHerck, Commander, North American Aerospace Defense Command and United States Northern Command, Holds an Off-Camera, On-The-Record Briefing on the High-Altitude Surveillance Balloon Recovery Efforts". U.S. Department of Defense. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "What could Japan do about foreign spy balloons over its territory?". Japan Times.
- ^ "Japan to pave way for military to shoot down intruding balloons". Straits Times.
- ^ "Chinese weather balloons no reason for alarm: MND". Taipei Times. CNA. February 28, 2022. Archived from the original on March 25, 2022. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
- ^ "National School Transportation Specifications & Procedures" (PDF). May 20, 2010. p. 47. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 25, 2022. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "The suspected Chinese spy balloon was as tall as a 20-story building and weighed thousands of pounds". Deseret News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ Spoehel, Jay (February 3, 2023). "China spy flight: What to know". Fox Business. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "US: Chinese Balloon Is part of Large Spying Program". Voice of America. February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson's Remarks on US Annoucement of the Postponement of Secretary of State Blinken's Visit to China". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Mansoor, Sanya (February 3, 2023). "The Alleged Chinese Spy Balloon Is Now Over Missouri. Here's What We Know About Its Path". Time. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b Helfrich, Emma; Trevithick, Joseph; Rogoway, Tyler (February 4, 2023). "Why Shooting Down China's Spy Balloon Over The U.S. Is More Complicated Than It Seems". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b c d "Senior Defense Official and Senior Military Official Hold an Off-Camera, On-Background Press Briefing Update on the High-Altitude Surveillance Balloon". U.S. Department of Defense. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Salama, Vivian; Gordon, Michael R. (February 9, 2023). "Chinese Balloon Carried Antennas, Other Equipment to Gather Intelligence, U.S. Says". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Williams, Abigail (February 9, 2023). "Chinese spy balloon carried 'multiple antennas' for collecting signals intelligence, State Dept. says". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ "Transcript: Pentagon Press Secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder Holds an On-Camera Press Briefing". U.S. Department of Defense. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Tomme, Lt. Col. Edward B. (2005). "The Paradigm Shift to Effects-Based Space: Near-Space as a Combat Space Effects Enabler" (PDF). College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, Air University. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Phillips, Aleks (February 3, 2023). "Shooting down Chinese spy balloon a lot harder than it seems". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese Spy Balloon Tracked Over U.S. This Week". The Wall Street Journal. February 2, 2023. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b "Gazette's spy balloon photos play role in White House's response to China". Billings Gazette. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ a b Szpaller, Keila (February 6, 2023). "Billings photojournalists recall seeing balloon before it was identified, shot down". Daily Montanan. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ a b c Kube, Courtney; Lee, Carol E. (February 3, 2023). "Suspected Chinese spy balloon found over northern U.S." NBC News. Archived from the original on February 2, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b c Cooper, Helene (February 3, 2023). "Pentagon Says It Detected a Chinese Spy Balloon Hovering Over Montana". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ a b Borger, Julian (February 3, 2023). "Pentagon says it is monitoring Chinese spy balloon spotted flying over US". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ a b * Palumbo, Daniele; Howells, Jeremy; Rivault, Erwan (February 3, 2023). "China balloon: Could it have been blown off course as Beijing claims?". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
* Petras, George (February 3, 2023). "US tracked suspected Chinese spy balloon for 5 days before shooting it down over the Atlantic". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023. - ^ a b "Suspected Chinese spy balloon sightings reported across U.S. as Pentagon tracks it". The Washington Post. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Norris, Robert S.; Kristensen, Hans M. (November 27, 2015). "U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2009". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 65 (2). Taylor & Francis: 59–69. doi:10.2968/065002008. eISSN 1938-3282. ISSN 0096-3402. LCCN 48034039. OCLC 470268256.
- ^ Cox, John (May 30, 2017). "Ask the Captain: Highest altitudes for planes". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Why stratospheric balloons are used in era of space-based intelligence". Defense News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Lawder, David (February 5, 2023). "Republicans criticize Biden for waiting to shoot down Chinese balloon". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Cooper, Helene; Wong, Edward (February 4, 2023). "U.S. Shoots Down Chinese Spy Balloon Off the Coast of the Carolinas". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Danner, Chas (February 5, 2023). "Did China's Alleged Spy Balloon Mission Backfire? Updates". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Moore, Stephanie. "Pictures: 'Chinese Spy Balloon' spotted over South Carolina, North Carolina". WYFF. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; February 5, 2023 suggested (help) - ^ Liptak, Kevin; Mattingly, Phil; Bertrand, Natasha; Muntean, Pete; Liebermann, Oren (February 5, 2023). "Inside Biden's decision to 'take care of' the Chinese spy balloon that triggered a diplomatic crisis". CNN. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Stanton, Andrew (February 4, 2023). "Chinese Spy Balloon Shot Down Over Atlantic". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Accettulla, Kevin. "Ground stop issued at Myrtle Beach International Airport due to suspected Chinese spy balloon". WBTW. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ "Ground stop issued along Carolina coast after unconfirmed sightings of Chinese spy balloon". WCNC-TV. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Morris, Kyle. "Where is the Chinese spy balloon now? Airship spotted flying over North Carolina". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Garamone, Jim (February 4, 2023). "F-22 Safely Shoots Down Chinese Spy Balloon Off South Carolina Coast". United States Department of Defense. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
A U.S. Air Force fighter safely shot down a Chinese high-altitude surveillance balloon today, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said in a written statement.
- ^ Altman, Howard; Payne, Stetson; Rogoway, Tyler (February 4, 2023). "F-22 Shoots Down Chinese Spy Balloon Off Carolinas With Missile (Updated)". The Drive. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Mitchell, Ellen (February 6, 2023). "Rough seas complicate US efforts to recover suspected China spy balloon". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Miller, Andrew (February 4, 2023). "Pentagon reveals details on how Chinese spy balloon was taken down with single shot". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ "US Navy working to recover debris from Chinese 'spy balloon'". Al Jazeera. February 6, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ LaGrone, Sam (February 4, 2023). "3 Navy Warships, FBI Now Hunting for Wreckage of Chinese Spy Balloon off South Carolina". USNI News. United States Naval Institute. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ "Suspected Chinese spy balloon shot down off South Carolina coast". CBS News. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ Vergun, David (February 6, 2023). "U.S. Navy Collecting Surveillance Balloon Debris". U.S. Department of Defense. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese High-Altitude Balloon Recovery". Federal Bureau of Investigation. February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b Lillis, Katie Bo; Herb, Jeremy; Campbell, Josh; Cohen, Zachary; Atwood, Kylie; Bertrand, Natasha (February 8, 2023). "Spy balloon part of a broader Chinese military surveillance operation, US intel sources say". CNN. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ Norman, Greg (February 6, 2023). "Here is where US is taking remains of China spy flight". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Musumeci, Natalie (February 8, 2023). "China says it wants its busted balloon back after the US Navy fished the suspected spy craft out of the ocean". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ "China Says US Should Return Debris From Balloon It Shot Down". Bloomberg News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ a b "Significant portion of Chinese balloon spy equipment recovered, US official says". ABC News. February 13, 2023.
- ^ a b "Chinese balloon sensors recovered from ocean, says US". BBC News. February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 15, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese spy balloon recovery operation has concluded". CNN. February 17, 2023.
- ^ Hutzler, Alexandra; Cathey, Libby; Deliso, Meredith; Guerilus, Stephanie (February 4, 2023). "Chinese balloon live updates: 'We're going to take care of it,' Biden says". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ Griffiths, Brent D. "Trump and other Republicans call for the US 'to shoot down' a suspected Chinese spy balloon". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Lawder, David; Sullivan, Andy (February 5, 2023). "U.S. military says it is searching for remnants of Chinese spy balloon". Washington: Reuters. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese balloon part of worldwide fleet, US officials say". BBC News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- ^ a b c Nakashima, Ellen; Harris, John; Hudson, Shane; Lamothe, Dan (February 7, 2023). "Chinese balloon part of vast aerial surveillance program, U.S. says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- ^ Wendler, Jacob (February 7, 2023). "House panel warns of China's threat to U.S. after surveillance balloon incident". United Press International. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Rogers, Mike (February 7, 2023). "Rogers Opening Statement at Hearing on Pressing Threat of CCP to U.S. National Defense". Armed Services Republicans. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Mascaro, Lisa (February 9, 2023). "US House votes to condemn China over balloon surveillance". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ H.Res. 104 (118th Cong.)
- ^ Singman, Brooke (February 5, 2023). "Trump, top national security officials refute claim that Chinese spy balloons transited US under last admin". Fox News. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Miller, Zeke; Baldor, Lolita C.; Madhani, Aamer (February 6, 2023). "White House: Improved surveillance caught Chinese balloon". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "US blacklists 6 Chinese entities over balloon program". AP.
- ^ "U.S. adds 6 Chinese entities tied to balloon program to export blacklist". Reuters. February 10, 2023.
- ^ "Additions to the Entity List". Federal Register. February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ "U.S. tracked China spy balloon from launch on Hainan Island along unusual path". The Washington Post. February 14, 2023. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ "US intel assessing possibility that Chinese spy balloon's path over US was accidental". CNN. February 15, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
- ^ D'Andrea, Aaron; Boynton, Sean (February 3, 2023). "Suspected Chinese surveillance balloon spent time in Canadian airspace: Sources". Global News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ "Canadian pilots were warned of 'untethered balloon' amid China surveillance concerns". Global News. February 3, 2023. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
- ^ Rychcik, Savannah (February 3, 2023). "China Issues Statement Following Reports of a Suspected Spy Balloon Over Montana". Independent Journal Review. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ a b Wang Fujiyama, Emily (February 6, 2023). "China accuses US of indiscriminate use of force over balloon". AP News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "China Says US Should Return Debris From Balloon It Shot Down". Bloomberg News. February 8, 2023. Archived from the original on February 8, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Wu, Huizhong (February 4, 2023). "China tries to minimize impact of suspected spy balloon after Blinken cancels visit". PBS NewsHour. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ Shoaib, Alia (February 12, 2023). "Chinese authorities said they were preparing to shoot down an 'unidentified flying object' spotted near the Yellow Sea". Business Insider. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ a b Gan, Nectar; Chang, Wayne (February 13, 2023). "China accuses US of 'illegally' flying balloons across its airspace". CNN. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ "No U.S. surveillance craft in China's airspace, White House says". Reuters.
- ^ Macias, Amanda (February 8, 2023). "Spy balloon confirms 'pattern of Chinese behavior' that poses threat to NATO members, Stoltenberg says". CNBC. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Wood, Richard (February 6, 2023). "Penny Wong backs US over shooting down of Chinese 'spy balloon'". 9news.com.au. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Ransley, Ellen (February 6, 2023). "Penny Wong urges calm after US shoots down China 'weather' balloon". news.com.au. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ "Foreign Minister Penny Wong responds to the balloon incident". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Lauren, Giella (February 6, 2023). "Putin Ally Backs China, Says U.S. Was Wrong to Shoot Down Spy Balloon". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
- ^ a b "Venezuela Condemns Washington for Shooting Down Chinese Balloon". Bloomberg News. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ "UK ready to defend against spy balloons – Rishi Sunak". BBC News. February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ "UK must wake up to China threat, says ex-MI6 chief Sir Alex Younger". BBC News. February 14, 2023.
- ^ "Spy balloon: China wanted surveillance balloon 'to be noticed' says defence analyst Michael Clarke". Sky News. February 3, 2023.
- ^ Sullivan, Helen (February 3, 2023). "Spy balloons: what are they and why are they still being used?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- ^ McGregor, Maeve (February 7, 2023). "Why would China use obsolete espionage when it operates advanced satellites?". Crikey. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- ^ Woo, Ryan; Torode, Greg (February 5, 2023). "China has reasons to keep cool after U.S. downs balloon". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- ^ Tharoor, Ishaan (February 5, 2023). "The balloon saga strains an already fraught U.S.-China relationship". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ "Spy balloons 'part of China's hybrid communication architecture', says aerospace security expert". Channel 4. February 13, 2023.
- ^ "Chinese balloon capable of gathering intelligence - US official". BBC News. February 9, 2023.
- ^ "High-Flying Balloon Seen as Part of Broader Chinese Spy Program". Bloomberg News. February 3, 2023.
- ^ "Spy Balloon Cold Open". Saturday Night Live. February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023 – via YouTube.
- ^ Stern, Marlow (February 5, 2023). "SNL Airs Hilarious Interview With Bowen Yang's Chinese Spy Balloon". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Alexander, Bryan. "'SNL': MSNBC lands exclusive interview with Chinese spy balloon: 'Congrats! You shot a balloon'". USA Today. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Speculation About Balloon Seen Over Costa Rica Continues". The Tico Times. February 5, 2023. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ "Fuerza Aérea detectó un objeto similar a un globo sobre cielo colombiano" [Air Force detected a balloon-like object over Colombian sky]. El Universal (in Spanish). February 4, 2023. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
- ^ Hutzler, Alexandra; Cathey, Libby; Deliso, Meredith; Guerilus, Stephanie. "Chinese balloon live updates: Second balloon flying over South America: Pentagon". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
- ^ "Un globo espía chino también flotó sobre Maracaibo pero Maduro ignoró su visita" [Chinese spy balloon also hovered over Maracaibo but Maduro ignored its visit]. La Patilla (in Spanish). February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Wang, Selina; Change, Wayne (February 6, 2023). "Balloon over Latin America belongs to China, Beijing says". CNN. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
- ^ Downing, Suzanne (February 10, 2023). "Breaking: Air Force shoots down item over Prudhoe; temporary flight restriction over Deadhorse, as Air Force C-130 circles Prudhoe Bay". Must Read Alaska. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Mackintosh, Thomas; Armstrong, Kathryn (February 12, 2023). "Chuck Schumer: Latest flying objects shot down were likely balloons". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
The US believes that the flying objects shot down over North American airspace on Friday and Saturday were balloons, according to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
- ^ Liebermann, Oren; Atwood, Kylie (February 12, 2023). "US military shoots down high-altitude object over Lake Huron on Sunday". CNN. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ Brook, Tom Vanden. "Another object shot down over Lake Huron in Michigan". USA Today.
- ^ Fabian, Jordan; McBride, Courtney; Litvan, Laura (February 14, 2024). "US Says 3 Mystery Objects Likely Private, With No China Link". Bloomberg News.
- Articles to be merged from February 2023
- 2023 in Alaska
- 2023 in British Columbia
- 2023 in international relations
- 2023 in Montana
- 2023 in Saskatchewan
- 2023 in South Carolina
- 2023 in Yukon
- 2023 in military history
- 21st-century aircraft shootdown incidents
- 21st-century history of the United States Air Force
- Accidents and incidents involving balloons and airships
- Aerial operations and battles involving the United States
- Airstrikes conducted by the United States
- Aviation accidents and incidents in 2023
- Aviation accidents and incidents in the United States in 2023
- Canada–China relations
- China–United States relations
- February 2023 events in Canada
- February 2023 events in the United States
- Biden administration controversies