User talk:SpruceyWind: Difference between revisions
Warning: Adding original research. |
Warning: Edit warring. |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by adding your personal analysis or [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|synthesis]] into articles, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-nor3 --> [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 20:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by adding your personal analysis or [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|synthesis]] into articles, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-nor3 --> [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 20:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi SpruceyWind! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring policy]] disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. |
|||
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Jc3s5h|Jc3s5h]] ([[User talk:Jc3s5h|talk]]) 20:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:09, 27 February 2023
February 2023
Hello! I'm Jc3s5h. Your recent edit(s) to the page Western astrology appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi SpruceyWind! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)