Jump to content

Talk:Cowboys–Vikings rivalry: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:


Not sure why [[User:Fred Zepelin]] thinks the source I provided isn't reliable. The numbers are accurate, are they not? – [[User:PeeJay|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay|Jay]] 20:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Not sure why [[User:Fred Zepelin]] thinks the source I provided isn't reliable. The numbers are accurate, are they not? – [[User:PeeJay|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay|Jay]] 20:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
: You have clearly not read [[WP:RS]]. It doesn't matter if the numbers are accurate or not. "Reliable source", in the context of Wikipedia, is a source that has editorial oversight, uses fact-checkers, etc. mcubed.net is clearly not that. If you have a question about whether it constitutes a reliable source, ask at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard]]. Meanwhile, leave the article as is until this discussion is complete. [[User:Fred Zepelin|Fred Zepelin]] ([[User talk:Fred Zepelin|talk]]) 21:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:59, 17 February 2023

Page should be deleted

This isn't much of a high-profile rivalry. These two teams have had great moments during their meetings but this isn't a rivalry worthy of a Wikipedia page. There isn't enough documentation outside of the 1970s to prove the historical nature of this rivalry. This was a great 70s rivalry but it is not one of the greatest rivalries of all-time. Mr.Viking18 (talk) 13:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Viking18, this article was already nominated for deletion before. See this to view the discussion. SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 14:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Playoff meetings

Not sure why User:Fred Zepelin thinks the source I provided isn't reliable. The numbers are accurate, are they not? – PeeJay 20:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have clearly not read WP:RS. It doesn't matter if the numbers are accurate or not. "Reliable source", in the context of Wikipedia, is a source that has editorial oversight, uses fact-checkers, etc. mcubed.net is clearly not that. If you have a question about whether it constitutes a reliable source, ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Meanwhile, leave the article as is until this discussion is complete. Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]