Jump to content

Talk:Latvia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Assessment: banner shell, Europe (Mid), WP1.0 (Low) (Rater)
Line 237: Line 237:


The link for the Latvian Union Party goes to the old and, as of 2001, defunct Latvian Union Party which was a centre-left party. The one being referred to is commonly known as the Union Party (found under the disambiguation for "Latvian Union Party"), is centre-right and should be the one that the link leads to, as there is seemingly nonconnection between the two. [[User:CritCee|CritCee]] ([[User talk:CritCee|talk]]) 19:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
The link for the Latvian Union Party goes to the old and, as of 2001, defunct Latvian Union Party which was a centre-left party. The one being referred to is commonly known as the Union Party (found under the disambiguation for "Latvian Union Party"), is centre-right and should be the one that the link leads to, as there is seemingly nonconnection between the two. [[User:CritCee|CritCee]] ([[User talk:CritCee|talk]]) 19:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

== Russian language in infobox ==

:Background information... <small> ''{{cite book | author1 = Artis Pabriks | author2 = Aldis Purs | date = 7 March 2013 | title = Latvia: The Challenges of Change | publisher = Routledge | pages = 74– | isbn = 978-1-135-13698-7 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=MSzjAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA74}}'' </small >... this is clearly historically controversial what's the best step forward?.<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 02:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:09, 7 February 2022

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage Template:Vital article

Religion - questionable data?

The ministry of justice, which publishes reports on the topic, writes here in report for 2012 [1] that it is problematic to ascertain number of religious people. In particular the number of catholics comes from here where they calculate it based on number of children baptized in 2007 (they claim that for last 50 years about the same number has been baptized every year). And the number of Lutherans reported has been questioned by members of that church [2] because it somehow nearly doubled from 2010 to 2011, although in reality there wasn't large number of people suddenly joining the faith ~~Xil (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Latvia

Hi! It would be great if you could create this article: Tourism in Latvia!

Perhaps you can draw some inspiration from Tourism in Brazil. :) Thanks & all the best, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

There's some vandalism in in the article that a simple edit seems unable to remove.

Specifically the section of the initial overview: Latvia is historically predominantly Protestant Lutheran, except for the Latgale region in the southeast, which has historically been predominantly Roman Catholic. Latvian no have potato. Is die from malnourish. For him sufferingis over.

Again, I've been unable to remove this piece of vandalism through editing the article. Perhaps someone with a bit more Wiki-Fu will be able to take care of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.45.13.134 (talk) 05:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was allready removed by bot. You probably need to clear cache of your browser/reload the page to see current version ~~Xil (talk) 06:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reworking the lead section

At this point the intro part of the article is really getting cluttered up.

It contains an unreasonable amount of wikipedia links (66, if my count is right) and dozens of non-essential technical terms/concepts that really have no business being in the lead part of the article. It's difficult to read, as the terms are mostly just stringed together with no added context. That, on the other hand, makes people skip the entire section altogether, which is arguably not a very effective way of providing a general idea about Latvia, its history, culture, politics, etc.

I'd like to hear out other people's opinions on this before re-writing it, as I genuinely don't want to have an edit war on my hands. :) Nameyxe (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 12 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

number of species

The article claime that

Approximately 27,700 species of flora and fauna have been registered in Latvia.

This was changed today to 30,000. I could not find either number in the reference Nature and Environment given in the footnote. I found the number 27,700 in several places:

That is strange. (I am not necessarily claiming that this number is wrong, but we need a source.)

--Austrian (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Austrian: added back the claim with source in Latvian. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 13 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Latvia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History of the term "Latvia"?

Does anyone know sources for how Latvia got its name? I know it's from the Latgalian tribes. But how was it decided in 1918 to name the country Latvia? Because that name as a region did not exist before - there were Livonia and Courland, etc. So there must have been a documented decision process somewhere. It's easy for Estonia and Lithuania, because those names existed for geopolitical regions since the early middle ages. But really hard to figure out how "Latvia" was decided on. For example why not Livonia? SørenKierkegaard (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain that it is possible to find a documented decision process. The term Latvia (Latvija) was not something they invented for the occasion. Have a look at Dievs, svētī Latviju!, the Latvian national anthem, and you will se the term was used in 1873 by Kārlis Baumanis. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 17:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It was unofficial name, promoted by first Latvian nationalists in 19th century, describing area where ethnic Latvians lived [3]. --Minnekon (talk) 00:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I ended up with the Young Latvians movement but by then they already had the name. Found no sources for how "Latvians" itself got to be widely used - had to have been before 1850 then. As an example, in Estonia it's clearly defined and known that the word "Estonians" was promoted by Johann Voldemar Jannsen and there are also many sources for how he promoted it. Couldnt find a similar source for the word "Latvians". 21:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Nobody knows how / by whom the word "Latvia" was promoted to become used by the nation? SørenKierkegaard (talk) 21:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Pirmais bija Juris Alunāns, kurš 1857. gadā laikrakstā "Inland” ieteica lietot nosaukumu "Latva"." In latvian wiki exactly this question has page: https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvijas_nosaukums (Google translate to english seems ~ok - to gain base understanding of source material)195.147.206.144 (talk) 04:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there is no reliable source for that attribution to Juris Alunāns. Wikipedia is strictly WP:NOR, ergo it isn't encyclopaedic content. To simply draw on the Latvian article is a contravention of 'Wikipedia is not a reliable source'. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Viking Age?

The Estonian history officially has a period which is called the Estonian Viking Age. Does Latvian history also have a term like that? I don't see it in the article but you did have the Curonian tribes. Blomsterhagens (talk) 23:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Latvian Union Party - Politics - Political Culture

The link for the Latvian Union Party goes to the old and, as of 2001, defunct Latvian Union Party which was a centre-left party. The one being referred to is commonly known as the Union Party (found under the disambiguation for "Latvian Union Party"), is centre-right and should be the one that the link leads to, as there is seemingly nonconnection between the two. CritCee (talk) 19:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russian language in infobox

Background information... Artis Pabriks; Aldis Purs (7 March 2013). Latvia: The Challenges of Change. Routledge. pp. 74–. ISBN 978-1-135-13698-7. ... this is clearly historically controversial what's the best step forward?.Moxy- 02:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Latvia&oldid=1070356348"