Jump to content

Talk:Justin Berry/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Possible references: - claiming previous edit
Line 23: Line 23:
*The amazon wishlist is a big part of the story. You should read the times article. I also don't see why the previous article was completely trashed. From what I recall it was fairly well done. -- [[User:JJay|JJay]] 09:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*The amazon wishlist is a big part of the story. You should read the times article. I also don't see why the previous article was completely trashed. From what I recall it was fairly well done. -- [[User:JJay|JJay]] 09:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


:Just standard operating procedure in a case like this.--[[User:208.54.65.56|208.54.65.56]] 14:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
:Just standard operating procedure in a case like this.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] 14:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:45, 8 March 2006

Total rewrite?

I'd like to see this article totally rewritten by uninvolved wikipedians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbo Wales (talkcontribs) 04:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry...is this part of some project? JHMM13 (T | C) 04:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I think that this article should possibly be a redirect to Kurt Eichenwald. Academic Challenger 04:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The subject of the article called Jimbo personally and was very upset about something in the article. So we're going to go through and rewrite being very careful about sourcing. JesseW, the juggling janitor 04:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


Possible references

These are the sources used in the old version of the article; they are a good place to start, I suppose. JesseW, the juggling janitor 04:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I added them in as external links (except the last one, that's rather creepy) and rewrote this to have some semblance of relevance. It's bare bones, and I doubt (hope!) that those changes won't be disputed.--Sean Black (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The amazon wishlist is a big part of the story. You should read the times article. I also don't see why the previous article was completely trashed. From what I recall it was fairly well done. -- JJay 09:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Just standard operating procedure in a case like this.--Jimbo Wales 14:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)