Wikipedia talk:Twinkle

Latest comment: 1 day ago by Pigsonthewing in topic Nomination for merger of Template:Incomprehensible

Twinkle does not update selections when copy-pasting via right click

edit

Virtually what the title says. I discovered this as I got lazy when adding tags via twinkle.
Steps:
1. Open the Twinkle gadget for tagging
2. Use the copy paste feature when right clicking to paste in a valid option (in my case, unreferenced)
Expected result: Twinkle should update to show the unreferenced option.
Actual result: Nothing updates and it stays on the screen from when it was opened.
Cheers! Klinetalkcontribs 18:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for an RfPP preset that addresses specific pattern of disruptive editing

edit

It would be nice to be able to select a page-protection preset designed to address MAB-style IP sockpuppetry on noticeboards where we want to avoid restricting new editors' access. Currently I've been applying 1-hour or 2-hour autoconfirmed or pending changes restrictions; I don't have strong opinions about what exact number is best but I can propose 2 hours pending changes as the preset in order to have a concrete suggestion to start with. The current sockpuppetry log statement is essentially fine, could be made more precise as Persistent sockpuppetry of a high-traffic forum. signed, Rosguill talk 22:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Twinkle shows Teahouse is protected when it expired two minutes ago

edit

At 23:45 November 19, 2024, I was going to remove the protection template from the teahouse when Twinkle says that it is protected. It actually expired two minutes ago (23:43 November 19). I think this is because my local time is "earlier" than UTC time (for example, if UTC is at 13:00, my local time is still before that), and Twinkle assumes my time zone is the same as UTC.

 
I captured a screenshot of the error.

Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Renaming fluff to rollback

edit

Hello talk page watchers. I have a patch in the queue that, once merged, will rename "fluff" to "rollback". Fluff is the bespoke name for Twinkle's rollback module which provides [rollback] links on diff pages. Anyway, this also involves renaming the preference variables confirmOnFluff and confirmOnMobileFluff. Changing these preference names will make Twinkle forget those two particular preferences for 937 users that are not using the default setting. If this patch is merged as is, those folks will have to go to their Twinkle preferences and turn those preferences back on manually.

Anyway, just wanted to check with the group first. Is this kind of collateral damage acceptable here? (A bunch of the 937 are probably inactive.) Or does it need to be mitigated somehow, with backwards compatibility code, an WP:AWB run to change them all, etc? I'm leaning towards it being acceptable, but happy to hear other thoughts. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  DoneNovem Linguae (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'd personally lean towards doing an AWB run to rename the variables, because it's low-risk and a quick fix. — Frostly (talk) 10:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
SD0001 wrote a patch to provide reverse compatibility, so we'll just do that I think. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Problems with WP:Twinkle

edit

When I try to revert edits on any article or Wikipedia page, it doesn't seem to revert it. Instead, it says this for example:

Grabbing data of earlier revisions: revision Diff revision number that was made 1 revisions ago by IP or username

I don't know if I'm the only one having this issue with Twinkle.

To note that I'm using Wikipedia on advanced mobile mode. I'll try on my desktop computer to see if it has the same problem or not, I haven't tried on my computer yet but will do it soon.

Anyway, can anybody tell me if this is a technical issue or a bug? PEPSI697 (💬📝) 00:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Only the "Restore this revision" feature works for me at the moment. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 00:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I tried to revert edits by 114.10.102.221 by clicking "Rollback", but this feature still didn't work for me. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I came here looking to see if anyone had asked this question.
I've had this problem since yesterday. Same message just sits on the screen. This is using mobile and Twinkle.
I will see what happens when I switch to Desktop, I didn't think to see what happened when I switched. Knitsey (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've just tried it in Desktop mode and using Twinkle, still doesn’t work. Knitsey (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Rollback (PERM, as well as Twinkle isn't working for me. Knitsey (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Moved thread from VPT. I couldn't reproduce any problems with rollback or vandalism rollback buttons on WP:Sandbox. @PEPSI697 Do you get any WP:JSERRORs in the browser console? – SD0001 (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is likely related to me renaming twinklefluff to twinkletollback this week. Will take a look. Need to get a good steps to reproduce though. Maybe a specific twinkle setting is involved. –Novem Linguae (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Novem Linguae @SD0001 I've been experiencing the same issues for the past few days. Can you assist me please?. ®asteem Talk 19:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Looks like all 3 of these folks don't have any Twinkle options set (twinkleoptions.js doesn't exist). @Rasteem. Can you please check for WP:CONSOLEERRORs and report back? Can you also let me know what skin you are using, and if you are on mobile or not? –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
OK, I was able to reproduce this. I think it only happens if there's no twinkleoptions.js file. "jQuery.Deferred exception: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'confirmOnFluff') TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'confirmOnFluff')", stack trace coming from "if (name === 'confirmOnRollback' && Twinkle.prefs.confirmOnFluff !== undefined) {". Will release a hotfix shortly. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Novem Linguae Yes, currently I'm on mobile. But how can I add twinkleoptions.js Manually.? ®asteem Talk 21:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry about it. I fixed the code instead. Try rolling back something in exactly 10 minutes. Should be fixed once caches clear in 10 minutes. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your prompt assistance is greatly valued. Thank you for your help and support!.  
I've created User:Rasteem/twinkleoptions.js and manually installed a script for custom Twinkle options. Fortunately, now I'm able to revert the changes using the Twinkle tool's rollback feature. It's now working correctly. [1] ®asteem Talk 21:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Feel free to try it without a twinkleoptions.js file. Should be fixed. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Novem Linguae:, mine seems to be working OK now. Knitsey (talk) 22:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yep, Twinkle is working fine for me again as well. All good. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 05:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Moving Template:Welcomeunsourced to Template:Welcome-unsourced

edit

Would this be fine if I added a redirect? Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 15:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just noting this has now been done. I've also added a wikilink to the header for convenience more than anything else. Primefac (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Pull request opened. Rusty 🐈 15:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template:Db-t5

edit

Please add the new Template:Db-t5. Gonnym (talk) 07:40, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocking users without talk page access places wrong template

edit

Until recently, if I blocked a user with Twinkle and disabled Talk page access, the block notice said so. The last few blocks it did not, and it therefore leaves a block notice that is misleading about the user's appeal rights. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see the same issue in testing on User talk:WK-test. Writ Keeper  15:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I figured this out and wrote a patch. Should be fixed and deployed in the next few days. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Changes to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback

edit

I'm planning to make some changes to Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback to make it dark mode compatible. The template will still work when substituted, but the results would be sub-optimal (try using dark mode User:Matrix/sandbox4, it works but it's not pretty). Hence I will strongly discourage substitution. I'm not aware if Twinkle is substing this template, but I would appreciate if this was changed before I make my changes. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? - uselessc} 18:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

propose splitting?

edit

Not sure if this has come up before, but I notice that Twinkle has multiple options for proposing merging, but doesn't appear to support the same for splitting. I'm imagining this wouldn't be difficult to add but as usual don't actually have any idea. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 05:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Probably because it's not quite as necessary; with a merge proposal, there are what, four pages that need editing? With a split, it's just the article with a {{split}} and the discussion itself. So I do suppose TW would save an edit, and if that's enough to merit adding to TW for some folks then I'd support it. Primefac (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Got any specifics in mind? i.e. "add X template to the tags module"? –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
If we wanna get fancy, I guess
and prompts for some of the options maybe, plus opening the needed talk page discussion? Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

The "TW" link in edit summaries has been largely deprecated in favor of the "Twinkle" tag, but it is still not completely a thing of the past. In particular, it is still used when configuring pending changes (phab:T247721), as well as when adding contentious topics alerts (see Asilvering's contributions for example). GTrang (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Configuring pending changes is the only place where Twinkle doesn't use the tag due to the API limitation. The contentious topic alerts are coming from User:Bellezzasolo/Scripts/arb.js which should really be banned from impersonating Twinkle. – SD0001 (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merger of Template:Incomprehensible

edit

 Template:Incomprehensible has been nominated for merging with Template:Confusing. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply