Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here | ||
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The Plot section of the film is bombarded with people constantly adding extraneous details and attempts to define purposefully ambiguous moments in the film. There has been a back-and-forth over the plot for over a month now that isn't calming. Can you lock it for a short span until people have cooled off, maybe? 194.74.175.114 (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- It would require a full lock, since there are EC editors adding to the plot. I'd prefer if someone attempted to create a topic at the talk page to discuss the issue before issuing full protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Declined This has been done. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Recent Arab-Israeli conflict article Wiiformii (talk) 18:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 18:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is a contentious topic, it needs be protected 2601:601:447E:8B50:B510:8DD5:12BF:235A (talk) 07:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent BLP-violating (and potentially COI, considering they're from the university's IP range) IP edits CR (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 128.151.128.0/18 (talk · contribs). from article for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – New editors are prohibited from editing this Arab-Israeli conflict related page. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 02:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined I know the arbitration enforcement here is supposed to be "broadly construed" but this might be too broad to wrap my mind around. Chetsford (talk) 06:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An edit warring IP is refusing to use the talk page (despite the open thread and several requests that he does so), but instead has been edit warring over several days. - SchroCat (talk) 09:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 10:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Editwarring Doug Weller talk 09:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page has been earlier vandalized by sockpuppets User:RationalIndia and keeps on getting vandalized by unconfirmed users. The page comes under south asian topics, prone to keep getting disrupted. Please allow only extended confirmed users to edit on this page. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Mass IP edits regarding winner of the season. MySlack1222 (talk) 10:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
- The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.