Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 27

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

March 27

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 27, 2024.

Irl A. Gladfelter

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Irl A. Gladfelter

Adurna

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Fictional element of a book which is not mentioned at the target, or anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Agorism.info

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed even after a relist. signed, Rosguill talk 21:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With no incoming links or history, and especially the case after the merge of Agorism, the ".info" page for Agorism has no mention at the target article, nor are there any mentions of this .info page on Wikipedia as a whole. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not at this time. Thanks for asking, though. - Eureka Lott 11:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ahoi Tour

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Ahoi Tour

Unitary People's Liberation Front of Yugoslavia

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google cannot find the term at all. WP:RFD#DELETE #8 (novel term). Викидим (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: "Unitary People's Liberation Front" is an alternative translation of the org's native language name ([1], [2]). The native language name formally contains what translates to "of Yugoslavia" to denote it refers to the central, federal organization, because there were also UPLF-s for districts. –Vipz (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Redirects are not supposed to promote neologisms. If the historians did not call UNLF by this English name, we should not either. Викидим (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Vipz. Seems that this is a term that is used to refer to the subject. Note that by including a redirect we are not in any way endorsing the name, and the only way most readers would ever know it exists is by searching for it. A7V2 (talk) 04:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Favorability

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 4#Favorability

Next Goal Wins (upcoming film)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 4#Next Goal Wins (upcoming film)

Great Expectations (upcoming TV series)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 4#Great Expectations (upcoming TV series)

Despite all my rage

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 4#Despite all my rage

Bodies (upcoming TV series)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in the spirit of WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target released over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rustin (upcoming film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target was released over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tracy Grandstaff

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Tracy Grandstaff

Giuseppe Bonifati

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as ambiguous as a redirect and per WP:REDYES. This subject of this redirect was also in Ferrari (2023 film). Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shōgun (upcoming miniseries)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 4#Shōgun (upcoming miniseries)

The Family Plan (upcoming film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target released over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Godmother (upcoming film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what this redirect is meant to refer to. I am assuming this redirect refers to Griselda (miniseries), but that has already been released. Steel1943 (talk) 21:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Homocyclic compound

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ring (chemistry)#Homocyclic and heterocyclic rings. ✗plicit 00:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Redirect to Ring (chemistry? 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: Ring (chemistry)? Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Retired2

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural closure. Target was deleted; tagging the redirect under CSD G8. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect left over from page move, not actively transcluded Awesome Aasim 20:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Le Hameau

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Le Hameau

(Two consecutive apostrophes)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#(Two consecutive apostrophes)

Easter dinner

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Easter food. I'm reading the nominator's withdrawal as a direct expression of support for the rettarget option proposed by asilvering. signed, Rosguill talk 21:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed in target. I don't believe Easter dinner is special in some way other than being a dinner on a holiday, if there are some particular traditions around it then they can be added to the target article and the redirect kept. Rusalkii (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hans Brusselmans

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timmermans lookalike, not notable by himself, not mentioned in the article. Confusing per WP:R#DELETE #2 Викидим (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

El séptimo sello

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish has nothing to do with the 7th seal. Only English and Swedish does. See WP:RFFL JuniperChill (talk) 12:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RLANG (aka... WP:RFFL, apparently. Huh.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Compatibility (biological)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Compatibility (biological)

Atimes.com

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I am weighing particularly heavily that the nominator for this discussion flipped to keep, and that another delete !voter essentially conceded the point that this would direct readers towards malware. signed, Rosguill talk 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Keep per Paul_012. This domain (now a redirect to malware) belonged to a different organisation called Asia Times. We risk confusing and misleading readers by having this redirect. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]
16:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Delete. No sense in inadvertently directing users to a malware site. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 16:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. How are they supposed to be different organisations? The article already covers the entirety of its history. Atimes.com was their old domain until 2019 when they moved to asiatimes.com, and continued to redirect there until it expired in 2020, according to the Wayback Machine. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Rich Farmbrough, could it be that you misunderstood the site's history? I see you recently mentioned on the target article's talk page that Asiatimes.com existed in 1996, but that's a different, unrelated site. Look at the Wayback Machine's calendar and you'll see that Asiatimes.com only became active in 2019, before which the site was at Atimes.com. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not a good idea to lead our readers to malware. --Lenticel (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Keyboard faces

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Editors are divided evenly between keep and delete after two relists. signed, Rosguill talk 21:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emoji are also keyboard faces, but the title is vague enough that the current target is probably not the most suitable, if any. Contains 2 edits of June 2009 history. While it looks like patrollers were lax about the "online emotions" unsourced cruft list, let's just say that NPP today would not approve of the immediate CSD within 2 minutes of creation and conversion into a redirect immediately after 💀. (Looking back on it, at least the text was legible so it wouldn't be complete nonsense imo). Nevertheless, very 2009 :v Utopes (talk / cont) 04:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: When I do a web search for keyboard faces, I see several websites with lists of emoticons, including one called keyboardfaces dot com. This indicates that term is used a reasonable amount. Kk.urban (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Searching the web, there are several encounters of terms like keyboard faces, Kawaii faces, ASCII faces, etc. We certainly do not need to emphasize on them in the target article, but for as long as there is no conflict with an established other meaning, keeping them is beneficial for users who enter the term into our search box wondering what it is. Deleting the redirect serves no purpose for our readers. --Matthiaspaul (talk)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Emotext

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Editors are divided between keep and delete after two relists. signed, Rosguill talk 21:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section title no longer exists. No mention of "EmoteXT" or "Emotext" anywhere on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This referred to an interesting reference describing "emotext" I could find in archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20020616050736/http://members.kr.inter.net/yesunny/genderps.html --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have tagged the redirect as an R from merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Terms like "text emoticon" or "text emoji" are quite commonly used terms to describe text- rather than graphical-based emoticons. I consider the swapped "emoticon text" and "emoji text" to be equally valid variants, so "emotext" sounds like a plausible abbreviation used by some people as well. For as long as there is no conflict with another meaning, the redirect helps people to find content about a related topic when entering it into the search box. Deleting the redirect does not serve our readers. But if there is no longer a direct anchor for the term in the article let's remove the #url-fragment from the link. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 20:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 1995 conference paper Gender, Pseudonyms, and CMC: Masking Identities and Baring Souls describing "emotext" might also allow other link targets like "lexical surrogate", "metalinguistic cue", "intentional misspelling", etc. besides "emoticon". So, if someone finds a better link target in the future, it could be changed. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:REVERT

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3#Wikipedia:REVERT

Nhà Bè River

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 07:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. I believe the Dong Nai (apologies for lack for diacritics) flows through Nha Be province, but I can't find any evidence that it is referred to that way. I don't read Vietnamese, so there may be important sources I'm missing. Rusalkii (talk) 20:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

November 9 1989

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fall of the Berlin Wall. This is consistent with the "keep" !votes, as they were articulated when only a single redirect, pointing to that targeet, was under discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect of a poorly formatted date to a particular event makes little sense, so WP:R#DELETE #2 ("confusion") applies. For the few ones who can remember a date, but not the event, there is 9 November in German history. Викидим (talk) 03:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This date is not simply 'poorly formatted'-- it's Americanly formatted! As the US was one of the two global superpowers pushing a side of the Cold War, one of the major events that marked the end of said conflict having a redirect written in this manner is far from surprising. That said, Retarget to 1989#November, which has not only a link to Fall of the Berlin Wall, but also a note that November 9th was when the 47th government of Turkey was formed. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
American date with month in the first place needs a comma. A proper format would be November 9, 1989. I have no objections against redirecting the correctly spelled November 9, 1989. Викидим (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind that these are redirects, not articles. We don't need to worry about what's pretty and perfect when naming a redirect, because not always will the general public type in something that's pretty and perfect. Instead, we need to worry about what's plausible for the general public to type. A dropped comma is perfectly within plausibility. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled November 9, 1989.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per Pppery. Bizarre to send this to "... in German history" since it's a specific date. Mauerfall is absolutely referred to by date alone, so we shouldn't delete these. -- asilvering (talk) 19:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Western era

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3#Western era

1st The Astra Creative Arts TV Awards

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 12:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely error, doesn't exist anywhere else on the internet. Page was at this title for about a day. Rusalkii (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pro-

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3#Pro-

Shemʿon VIII Sulaqa

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 12:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This spelling does not seem to be used anywhere outside the Spanish Wikipedia. WP:R#DELETE #8 (obscure). Викидим (talk) 05:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 16:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DFTS

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 7#DFTS

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_27&oldid=1217801570"