Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

July 24

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 24, 2024.

Eli Kowaz

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 1#Eli Kowaz

1.6

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 22:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this confusing redirect. Between representing the first 2 digits of 1.618, its current target, random version numbers of software firmware, the article about the 1/6 event in the US, and that formatting dates with periods is ... not done, this redirect is just a mess. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete An untenable redirect. If it were a popular shorthand for the events of a particular January 6, then it would make sense to redirect it to the article on the event article, but, this, no. Nor is it good for the golden ratio, which isn't generally approximated to 1.6. And the original target, Counter-Strike, is opaque, at least to me. I do see a 1.6 Band that would be suitable if a case is made that the band was often referred to as just "1.6". Largoplazo (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think disambiguate between Counter-Strike 1.6 and 1.6 Band. 88.235.215.238 (talk) 08:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • In case anyone is curious, similar titles aren't treated with much consistency. 1.0 and 1.2 are redirects; 1.1 and 1.5 are disambiguation pages; while 1.3, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 don't exist. - Eureka Lott 21:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or possibly disambiguate per above, too generic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or disambiguate. Counter-strike 1.6 does seem to be the top result if you search for "1.6", but this seems to be a kind of absurd redirect for the number. References to the date are nonexistent in the first few pages of results, the rest is a mix of version numbers for video games, software, some provisions of various legal codes thus numbered, and actual usage of the number. I don't feel particularly strongly about deletion vs disambiguation, but on the whole none of these topics seem to use the bare 1.6, so leaning towards deletion. Rusalkii (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or disambig as second choice) per Rusalkii. Counter strike was top of my search results, but only the first three entries. After than came (cars with) 1.6 litre engines, software versions numbered 1.6 and various uses of 1.6 as a number (e.g. an article about something costing €1.6bn, Islam having 1.6 billion adherents, a 1.6 million-year-old discovery), — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thryduulf (talk • contribs) 21:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sweden incident

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 22:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Phrasing of the redirect is vague regarding if having an exclusive connection to the subject of the target section: When search for this phrase on third-party search engines, one of the top results is 2023 Quran burnings in Sweden. Steel1943 (talk) 21:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

TrumPAC

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Amy Kremer#2016 presidential election. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. However, it seems a topic by the name of this redirect has some sort of connection to its target: Searching for this word on third-party search engines seems to return results for a political action committee for Donald Trump that looks as though it was active only during the 2016 presidential campaign season. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trump campaign controversies

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

The redirect is not exclusive to the target. (There were controversies in all 3 of Donald Trump's presidential campaigns since 2016. [Not sure about the 2000 one.]) I would suspect there's a place to retargeting this redirect, sort of acting as a disambiguation page, but I'm currently not seeing it. Maybe this should be a WP:BROADCONCEPT? Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Support for President Donald Trump by white Americans

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 1#Support for President Donald Trump by white Americans

Support for Donald Trump

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 1#Support for Donald Trump

Ideological neutrality of the state

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 15#Ideological neutrality of the state

Rivet media attention on Donald Trump

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "Rivet media attention" is mentioned in the target article, but it doesn't seem mentioned in a way to validate searching this phrase in any form as a way to arrive at the target article. Otherwise, this phrase is probably vague since it may refer to other topics related to Donald Trump. Steel1943 (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This reads like a segment from a sensational news article. This is not a plausible search term. Ca talk to me! 16:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trump's politics

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Political positions of Donald Trump. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking the phrasing of this redirect would me more appropriate targeting Political positions of Donald Trump, but I'm not completely sure. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per nom. The article Trumpism casts a wider net than just Trump's positions. Political positions of Donald Trump, however is limited to Trump's policy positions, reflecting the redirect title. Politics of Donald Trump already redirect there. Ca talk to me! 16:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

MAGA tourist

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 2#MAGA tourist

Former president(s) of the United States

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of presidents of the United States. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would believe that readers looking up these phrases would actually be intending to find a list of former presidents of the United States, such as List of presidents of the United States. Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of nearest free floating planetary mass objects

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unusable and unsearchable WP:XY redirect. Also, the redirect target doesn't contain a list of the nearest free floating planetary mass objects. 21 Andromedae (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Super Mario Wii 2: Galaxy Adventure Together

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8#Super Mario Wii 2: Galaxy Adventure Together

Kangxi Radicals

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Kangxi radical. signed, Rosguill talk 19:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Either Kangxi Radicals (Unicode block) sjhould be moved here, or it should point to Kangxi radical (where Kangxi radicals points). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Best Year Ever

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 16#Best Year Ever

Imperial Royalty

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 15#Imperial Royalty

Invasion of Mexico

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overly broad term; no evidence that it is linked only to this specific war. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If there are other wars this term might describe, this one is overwhelming likely to be the one intended. The others can be listed in a disambiguation page linked on a hat note. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 03:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambig or keep. Primary topic of a quick google search does seem to be the Mexican-American War by a fairly wide margin, but I think a disambig page would be helpful here given that it is a generic term for something that has occurred several times (I also found Candelaria border incursion of 1919, in addition to Thryduulf's listed pages). Funnily enough, most of the first page of google results that isn't the current target is a hypothetical modern American invasion of Mexico, which we (very reasonably) don't have a page for but does get a one-sentence callout at Mexico–United_States_relations#Biden_administration. Rusalkii (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Teemo

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 15#Teemo

Sonic Wiild Fire

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

either an implausible misspelling or an implausible pun. i don't know which outcome is worse, but the term doesn't seem to see much (if any) use in the context of sonic, with or without a space cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment/Weak Keep - Article has mention of "Sonic Wild Fire" as the game's original working title, and a single doubling of a character is a potentially plausible typo, so I don't see a need to go out of our way to delete this thing, but I'll grant that searching the original working title to begin with is a rare proposition, so it's not like I feel strongly about this one. (Entirely possible the redirect creator was making a Wii system pun) Fieari (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chhota Bheem 2

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All redirects were created on the same day by the same creator as a chronological search aid for theatrical films in order of release for the series. Apart from animated films, Chhota Bheem also has a live action film and is a television series. Lack of "film" in the redirect titles was a factor in the deletion of Chhota Bheem 1 and Chhota Bheem 5 at the recently closed RfD WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25#Chhota Bheem 1. Chhota Bheem 3 redirects back to the parent article that has no listed chronology. I would recommend deletion consistent with the already deleted ones. Jay 💬 22:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in the linked RfD, the lack of 'film' in the title wasn't my issue with Chhota Bheem 1 and Chhota Bheem 5-- the issue I had was that the redirect target was incorrect, pointing to Chhota Bheem and the Curse of Damyaan (2012 film) instead of the actual first and fifth films: Chhota Bheem Aur Krishna and Chhota Bheem: Journey to Petra. (You may notice that both of those redirect to the Chhota Bheem page itself-- that's because we don't have information on those films.)
By that logic:
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tone (color)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Tint, shade and tone * Pppery * it has begun... 03:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These two redirects should point to the same article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target both to Tint, shade and tone. The Lightness article has four mentions of the word Tone according to ctrl-f: the first is a link to Tint, shade and tone that pretty much rephrases that article's title ("Tints, shades, and tones"), the second is a See Also link that also goes to Tint, shade and tone, the third is a third link to Tint, shade and tone, this time as part of the Color Topics template, and the fourth is a link to Pantone that's also in the Color Topics template. From this we can easily deduce that the information someone looking for when they search Tone (color) is *not* on the Lightness page itself, and is instead on the Tint, Shade and Tone page. Retarget as appropriate. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Raymoo

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 15#Raymoo

Electric Turbo

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Porsche Taycan 'Turbo' models don't actually have a turbocharger, it's just a namesake for a higher-performance model of a car. In that sense, it's kinda misleading. I did a google search, and 'electric turbo' doesn't seem to be a common nickname for the Taycan Turbo models either. Now, looking at retarget options, there does exist electric supercharger (I know technically there's no such thing as an "electric turbo" but that's what {{R from incorrect name}} is for), but having a look at that article, there also exists electrically-assisted turbocharger, so I'm not sure where to retarget it to. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 17:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Thryduulf: Why vote twice in favour in the same RFD request? Intrisit (talk) 10:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't "vote twice". My second comment was responding to discussion that happened after I left my first comment, highlighting that I was aware of that discussion but explaining why it hadn't changed my mind. Thryduulf (talk) 10:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now As much as I see Thryduulf as a statement to keep this title, I agree/side with Jay, Pppery, Shhhnotsoloud and per WP:TNT that this needs an overhaul for acceptance here on WP. Intrisit (talk) 10:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cunty

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cunt#Other usage. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should instead redirect to Cunt#Other_usage. Mentioned at target, much more likely to be what people are trying to find. Also, the redirect is fully protected. Why?? SmokeSomeDrinkSomePopOne (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't need to speak for Nyttend, I guess, since they received notice of this listing, but their edit summary upon creating the redirect was "Created as redirect; I'm constantly making this typo", so the rationale for the current target is bespoke. I don't know why Lectionar protected it the next day, but that it's listed here takes issue with their explanation, "no need to change this". It's possible that this term is more likely to be typed by someone actually looking up the word "cunty" (a word I learned from drag-involved people in Washington, D.C., in the 1980s as a synonym, I think, for "bitchy", often in the phrase "cunty-fierce", to describe a queen's outfit or persona; I have no idea whether it's current or more widespread) than by someone mistyping "county". Largoplazo (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wikt:cunt lists four meanings as an adjective, I think the third one matches the usage you describe. Thryduulf (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget the current target doesn't mention this unlike the proposed one and I can't see how this is a particually likely misspelling especially when there is another mention of it elsewhere which does use the term even if not a separate article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nominator as a more likely search term, I still see the word cunty used as seen above and sometimes as an insult and it doesn't seem like a likely misspelling of county. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2009 presidential election

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of elections in 2009. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both Iran and Afghanistan had presidential elections in 2009. C F A 💬 14:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Red Caesar

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 12#Red Caesar

Empire of Death (Doctor Who novel)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 13#Empire of Death (Doctor Who novel)

Lee Min-ho (singer)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 9#Lee Min-ho (singer)

Draft:San Diego Clippers (NBA)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to San Diego Clippers (NBA). (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts talk 16:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural renomination at the correct venue. Previously nominated at MfD by User:Intrisit here with rationale: Created out of an AFC script which I have no idea why. It doesn't seem to align with WP:RPURPOSE than its mainspace rdr counterpart which does the job anyway. Redundant redirect that must go! Nickps (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, such redirects are common and generally appropriate; see WP:RDRAFT. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mesopotamian language

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mesopotamia#Language and writing. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect currently points toward Akkadian - but there were many other languages spoken in Mesopotamia. There is also no individual article to retarget it to. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kepler-1229b: I was about to close this as "retarget". But I would like to know your opinion on the retargeting suggestion above? CycloneYoris talk! 00:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer a retarget, but when I made this listing I couldn't find any suitable article/section to link it to. I think this can be closed as retarget. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_July_24&oldid=1240610301"