Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

April 11

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 11, 2024.

CounterfeitElectronicComponents

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improper title format that gets next to no page views. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bruce Shotland

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this redirect for deletion due to lack of relevance. There was no mention of this person on the target page at the time of the redirect's creation, nor is there now (or anywhere else on enwiki, for that matter). An internet search reveals that there is a science teacher with this name, but no specific connection to peptide bonds that I can discern. Quesotiotyo (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Qwertqwert

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 17:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Great Expectations (upcoming TV series)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There is no clear agreement among participants whether the remaining page views justify keeping or deleting. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in the spirit of WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target was released over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pedalanka, Bhattiprolu mandal

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was wrong venue. Completed the uncontroversial move; all existing titles on and off Wikipedia refer to Bhattiprolu with this spelling. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedalanka, Bhattiprolu mandal (current redirect target) is the correct spelling as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhattiprolu_mandal . So the page and its redirect need to be swapped. Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Curse bowl

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Looks as if "incantation" and "curse" can be interchanged, did not seem to me at first. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 03:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The word "curse" is not mentioned at the target article, nor do any of the topics at the target have any correlation to "curses" to my understanding. It is, however, mentioned at Super Bowl curse, and various football championships have been dubbed as the "Curse Bowl" due to bad things happening, [1]. It is also one letter off of Cure Bowl, which might be more plausible than a target where the title isn't mentioned. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Curse bowl" is, I thought, the more common and less precise term. I didn't know that page was there at "incantation bowl" at all, that's why I originally made a stub instead of a redirect. There could be other people who don't know the term incantation bowl. Temerarius (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep connection between redirect and target name seems intuitively clear. Google results suggest most uses are related to incantation bowl, including academic sources (see e.g. Thryduulf's examples), though with a sizable minority referring to various Super Bowls. Rusalkii (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a synonymn, regardless of being mentioned in the article or not (although if academic sources are using this name, perhaps it should be added to the article). Fieari (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chat Control 2.0

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. With refinement. Thanks for the addition! (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 03:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of anything indicative of a "2.0" at the target page. The target mainly talks about Chat Control from a singular-usage standpoint, which Chat Control currently exists as a redirect too. External searches has led me to believe that "Chat Control 2.0" is a different piece of legislation entirely, which shares similarities to this one. Without any dedicated content, however, this redirect does not appear very useful. (No mention of "Chat Control 2.0" anywhere on Wikipedia by the way). Utopes (talk / cont) 03:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, things found in external searches refer to the same thing using the added "2.0" in the name, but such naming has mainly been used by activists (e.g. by EU Pirate Party) and such sources have not been cited on the article. Such activists refer to a separate earlier legislation as "Chat Control 1.0" (still a topic as legislators debate extending it, and originally referred to it simply as "Chat Control"), hence the added 2.0, while the sources WP has cited don't talk about the earlier legislation with such naming, and drop the 2.0 when labeling the newer. The older "1.0" legislation was adopted in July 2021 but was/is time-limited, the 2.0 legislation was inspired by it and sought to make it more permanent and to take further steps.
It seems good to cover the naming so that readers know what the labels refer to and have been used for, but there's no real coverage on it. Also, I'm unsure what sources would qualify. --JoelKP (talk) 11:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention has been added yet to the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added to target. (diff) Keep or refine to Regulation to Prevent and Combat Child Sexual Abuse § Criticism of the proposal. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Favorability

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Favorability

Macmillan Digital Publishing

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article, and google search found nothing about it. DrowssapSMM 12:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gullible.info

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very useful redirect. It is mentioned at the target page and receives hundreds of daily pageviews. This title is an alternate name for the subject and it would be a great idea to keep it. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Forced-birther

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 09:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think these redirects are appropriate. The language "forced-birther" seems to be rather pejorative, like creating baby murderer and redirecting it to Abortion-rights movements.

I also want to clarify that I do not oppose abortion rights, but WP:NPOV applies to these redirects too. RockstoneSend me a message! 07:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Okmrman (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Grizzly-1

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another 2009er, there is no mention of "Grizzly-1" anywhere on Wikipedia. Without any content about this apparent Beast Wars character, this redirect is currently unhelpful and leaves readers lacking information. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gris (card game)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of a card game called Gris at the target. Has always been a redirect, used to target Spoons and Spoons (card game) when it was its own thing in 2009. Without a mention or any context as to what "Gris" is, this redirect is not helpful and leaves people confused upon arriving at the page. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I attempted to do a history dive in an attempt to find out if there'd ever been information on this subject-- and found that Spoons was never its own article, but rather, was the article's old name prior to being moved to Donkey (card game) and then again to Pig (card game). With that information in hand, I found that the editor who made the Gris (card game) redirect made an edit to the Spoons/Pig article on the very same day-- and that said edit contained zilch in the way of information or mention of Gris, nor did any edits immediately prior or after. I can reasonably assume that Pig (card game) / Donkey (card game) / Spoons (card game) has NEVER had information on Gris. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gribbly

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gribbly

Great September

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "great" at the target article. Basically all google search results for a "great september" are in reference to the Great September Gale of 1815, although this is only a partial title match of that. Seems to be an assortment of different septembers that could also be considered "great".

This redirect seems to very much be a product of its time, as this particular September '93 was a lot more "current" in 2005 than it is in 2024. With no mention, a "great September" could refer to a lot of things. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Great Firewall of America

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a topic discussed at the target article. It's only mention is being the title of Rebecca MacKinnon op-ed, used as a reference. This particular reference is the only time on all of Wikipedia that it is used.

But as the saying goes, I'll have two nickels here because the same reference is also used in the Stop Online Piracy Act article. But not only just the reference is reused, the entire paragraph is reused, and quotes the op-ed basically as a carbon copy each time, at PROTECT IP Act#Concern for user-generated sites, and Stop Online Piracy Act#Websites that host user content. By the way, the Great Firewall of America isn't discussed in either, but appears as the colloquial name that MacKinnon alludes to in her quotes pulled here. Without any further information and only 2 locations where it comes up at all, this doesn't seem useful or helpful. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Goulash (magazine)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Goulash (magazine)

Gorbino's Quest

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gorbino's Quest

Good Thing (Jake Miller song)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Jake Miller discography#Singles. (non-admin closure) ToadetteEdit! 22:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No such song with this title at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

FIFA 2003

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to FIFA Football 2003. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More likely to refer to the video game FIFA Football 2003. O.N.R. (talk) 23:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 (fifa.com)
  • Trophy and award winners, for FIFA in 2023 (fifa.com)
  • Amazon listing for FIFA 23 on Xbox One
  • 2023 FIFA tournaments in photos (fifa.com)
  • Forbes article talking about what happened to FIFA in 2023
  • FOX Sports page for the Women's World Cup
  • Reddit, linking to discussions of the video game AND FIFA itself AND the cup
  • Amazon listing for FIFA 23 on PS4
  • FIFA 2023 listing on Sony Store Malaysia for... some reason... Google, you know I'm in the Southern US, right???
  • FOX Sports for Women's World Cup 2023
  • fifa.com again, Watch the best goals from the Women's World Cup
  • FIFA 2023 for PS5 listing on... Toys R Us UAE!?!? Google pls
  • Olympics.com page about the Women's World Cup
  • EA Answers page about FIFA 2023 Career Mode
  • okay I don't know what language that's in, Spanish? It's fifa.com tho so I'll assume it's the World Cup and/or FIFA itself
  • Youtube link about how to play FIFA 2023 on Android
  • Dick's Sporting Goods listing for FIFA 2023 themed soccer balls
Summary, my search is all over the place, with no clear primary target. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lunamann: Can you do some critical thinking about what those results tell you? Of these, how many are an exact title match for "FIFA 2003"? Are you are getting results for the World Cup, but they are simply within the phrase "FIFA 2003 Women's World Cup" (or similar) without solely calling the subject "FIFA 2003"? If so, that's what disambiguators call a "partial title match" and should not be used in a (hypothetical) disambiguation. Would someone simply search "FIFA 2003" looking for the World Cup if it's not used, branded, or abbreviated in that fashion as often as someone looking for a video game that is commonly abbreviated this way? Furthermore, do you think an arbitrary dumping of algorithmic Google search results is a good proxy for determining primary usage on Wikipedia? -- Tavix (talk) 14:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My search results for the search "FIFA 2023" -Wikipedia -"FIFA's" (the latter exclusion becuase many of the results were for that, but you'd discount them as irrelevant whether they are or not):
  • 2× Amazon listing of the game on XBox
  • "Smart Home Sounds" listing of the game for PS4
  • FOX Sports Women's World Cup 2023 teams
  • 5 reddit threads, 3 about the game, 1 about the Women's world cup, 1 about working at FIFA, 1 I can't work out.
  • FOX Sports Women's World Cup 2023 news
  • Olympics.com Answering questions about the Women's World Cup
  • Medium piece about the game
  • BBC article about the Women's World Cup
  • EA Answers HQ (about the game)
  • YouTube video about the best 30 goals in FIFA competitions in 2023
  • The FIFA Code of Ethics in Spanish
  • BBC Sport article about the Women's World Cup group stages
  • YouTube Viode about the game
  • "Creative Bloom" article about the Women's World Cup (mainly the logo and similar design elements)
  • A mod for the the game
  • 3 Google Books results, 1 about the human rights risk at the World Cup, 1 that is a 2023 publication about the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, 1 I don't know - the snippet includes "FIFA 2023 co-hosting plan" but not enough context to make sense of that.
  • Marca.com about "The Best FIFA 2023" - "what time and where to watch the FIFA gala on TV and online"
  • Microsoft Community about the game on xbox
  • 2 Results about buying the game, 1 in Malaysia, 1 in the UAE.
  • A Youtube video that I think is about comparing the goals in the Women's World Cup with the goals in the game
  • An article about all things FIFA in 2023 including the world cup and the game.
So, even discounting partial title matches, the indication overall is that there is very much no primary topic for the exact phrase. And yes, google search results are one good indication of what people are looking for with a given search term. Thryduulf (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
forgive my possible unsmartness, but where did the 2023 part come from?
i thought this was about 2003 cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also not entirely certain, 'twas Thryduulf who started talking about 2023 instead of 2003 and I think we all just followed suit without realizing? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is the proposed target "FIFA 2003" the primary topic? Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try — disambiguate or retarget to FIFA Football 2003?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to FIFA Football 2003. I've never heard world cups referred to in that way, and have almost exclusively heard FIFA videogames referred to as `FIFA 2003` or whatever other year. The provided "evidence" for redirecting to the event is a google search, which is not a reliable secondary source. Brindille1 (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gib gnab

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Big Crunch#In culture. Jay 💬 06:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this term at either of the target pages, and no mention of this term on all of Wikipedia. One of these was created 19 years before the other, which doesn't matter but still interesting. I've now come to understand this term being "Big Bang" backwards, but without context these have debatable use as unmentioned synonyms, and probably shouldn't have differing targets as "gib gnab" and "gnab gib" both come up at seemingly the same frequency? Utopes (talk / cont) 06:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually two of them are very old, and yes this does matter. The older a redirect the more likely it is that it is used somewhere off wiki. Hence the injunction Therefore only delete redirects which are very new or harmful.
I have added a section to the Big Crunch article, therefore:
Retarget all to Big Crunch#In culture. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]
I should have been more clear @Rich Farmbrough:, I did not mean to imply that there wasn't a difference between old and new redirects. I was saying that in this case there wasn't a difference in how I felt for both, i.e. I would push for the same outcome for both targets. Keep both, delete both, retarget both, etc. (I wouldn't want to keep just one and not the other. Either all or none, and at the same target.) Generally speaking, the older a page is the more likely it has external links, you are correct. However, now that there is content for this term, both can safely end up pointed there, so thank you for the content you created at Big Crunch. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget as per Rich Farmbrough. Thank you! 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Paramount Television International Studios

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Paramount Television International Studios

German Low German language

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawn, works for me. I suppose this is the "German variant" of a language that includes the word German, so it's plausible to type twice in that regard. That also explains the lack of links here. Thanks for the tip! (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 06:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible to use "german" twice when referring to Low German, not a likely search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

German Low German language is the name used at Wiktionary for Low German as spoken in Germany as opposed to the Netherlands. I don't know how to check links to Wikipedia from Wiktionary, but there are probably hundreds if not thousands of such links. —Mahāgaja · talk 06:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

General OneFile

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#General OneFile

Gender and authoritarianism

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gender and authoritarianism

Wikipedia:RFDd10

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's also WP:RDEL number 10. To my understanding though not any of the other points have incoming redirects. This is the only version that points here, and saw no links after a month of creation (as the creator was shortly community blocked thereafter). In any case, probably not necessary to redirectify via anchor; several more efficient and plausible ways exist. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DZHH-AM

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#DZHH-AM

Chen Mazzig

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

9 Google hits for this name, none of them seem to be this person. Can't find evidence they're referred to in this way. Rusalkii (talk) 04:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Untitled Guy Ritchie project/film

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Meh, forgot that WP:UFILM also applies to titles containing "Untitled". Either way, I'm going to retarget Untitled Guy Ritchie film to In the Grey for consistency for now. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The targets are no longer untitled. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Keep, the first project/redirect was moved just a few hours ago and has 63 thousand monthly pageviews. Can delete later but this doesn't fall under the 30 day spirit of WP:UFILM. Maybe not keep the second one at The Covenant page though. I don't really care too much about it because the project was just moved and the film version targeted the project for over a month, before being reverted right before RfDing. Maybe do something about this a little later. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Snow White (live action)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Snow White (disambiguation). ✗plicit 03:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can refer to several films listed at {{Snow White}}. There is no expectation this redirect is in reference to Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film). Steel1943 (talk) 03:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Snow White remake

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Snow White remake

TDVC

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why this could also not refer to subject at DVC. But, then again, I'm not sure why there any expectation that the target article or any subjects at DVC should be or have been referred to by this acronym in any sources. Steel1943 (talk) 03:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

TDOTJ

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though the acronym matches the title of the target page, there does not seem to be evidence that the target page's subject has been referred to by an acronym, possible being WP:OR WP:NEO. Steel1943 (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LVER

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that any of the subjects in the target disambiguation page are referred by this acronym. In addition, the target being the only mention of a phrase with words starting with L, V, E, then R is rather unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 03:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah. I remember tagging one of several redirects created by Redostone and wondering if these abbreviations are really necessary. I would go with Delete and I suggest looking through his page creation log since he definitely has a history of creating questionable redirects. Okmrman (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

"Getting high" and "Being high"

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep Being high and Retarget Getting high. (non-admin closure) Okmrman (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure these phrases should either target the same target or both get deleted. Not sure which target though. Steel1943 (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget Getting high to Substance intoxication, which mentions the phrase in bold. It's also the more sensible target, in my opinion. Keep Being high. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

GittiGidiyor

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Gittigidiyor was salted. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this was the name of eBay's marketplace in Turkey, until they closed it in 2022. Which explains why it's so hard to find English-language sources-- this wasn't an English-language site, and it's also no longer in service.
I'm fairly certain that at the very least, GittiGidiyor wasn't an attempt to get around salt, as it's how the site's name was actually written. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How naive of you. It was salted 22 June 2010. The very same person who created Gittigidiyor twice in the deleted history created this version too on 28 June 2010. I'm sure it was bad faith salt evasion. But that's irrelevant now as none of these are mentioned at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't catch that the creator was the exact same, ack. Good eye. Not sure how to feel about you calling me naive, though... Ow.
Yeah, this was salt evasion. At the very least, I'm not sure we need to worry about spreading salt to these locations too, given the site in question is now deleted? No sense trying to advertise for a site that no longer exists, after all. Definitely delete though, these are unmentioned and it's unlikely that someone's going to want to search for these in the near future given... site's dead, Jim. (Not sure how I forgot to add that to my first post lol) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nahdonnis Praji

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notability and lack of mention. TNstingray (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jerus Jannick

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Utterly non-notable character mentioned nowhere. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Quiggold

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly minor character mentioned nowhere on Wikipedia besides another entry on Matthew Wood's extensive voice credits in Star Wars. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 00:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vober Dand

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly minor background character not mentioned anywhere on the encyclopedia. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 00:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_11&oldid=1221302264"