Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 24

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

June 24

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 24, 2020.

Imperial spy

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article, and is more related to Star Wars or Lego Star Wars: The Complete Saga. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Imperial Spy

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Section is gone, not mentioned at target article, and is referring to a character in Lego Star Wars: The Complete Saga. Also, Imperial spy redirects to Galactic empire (which does not mention the redirect either and is also referring to the same character), so I'm nominating that one separately. OcelotCreeper (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

위키백과:대문

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RLOTE signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

⧖

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 1#⧖

⧓

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 1#⧓

Multilinear

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 2#Multilinear

2015 LG ICC Awards

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per recent RfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Redirect left over from move, as stated in that rationale, LG didn't sponsor the awards this year and so this redirect is wrong and misleading Joseph2302 (talk) 16:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

What is thy bidding my master

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article. Delete unless the article both mentions and explains the importance of the quote. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Detroit-Hillsdale-&-Indiana Railroad

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Totally implausible misspelling. John from Idegon (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The talk (parenting)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Talk. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out at Talk:The talk (racism in the US), this could either refer to the current target or The birds and the bees talk. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 15:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L2 norm

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#L2 norm

Sihi( सीहि)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible combination of different writing systems and incorrect formatting of brackets. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oberhauptling

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-English as well as misspelt (Oberhäuptling would be correct); old but very few views; not referenced at all in the target article and no links. -- Der Trutinator (talk) 12:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

⦉

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Current target is correct since they're basically all Z notation symbols. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target; seems to be related to schemas (see [1]). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:46, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

⋿

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 1#⋿

⦈

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, but could, if information is added to the article, be retargeted to Image (mathematics) (see [2]). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:26, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

⨾

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 1#⨾

Horizontal line with a dot above and a dot below

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Obelus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a strange description, and could also refer to obelism. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From 5th grade, everyone knows the division sign looks like that. {{3125A|talk}} 12:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@3125A: So what is your vote? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: delete. {{3125A|talk}} 12:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@3125A: Be careful of your sweeping usage of "everyone" because not everyone enjoys the same life experiences as you did. From the article on the division sign: This usage, though widespread in Anglophone countries, is neither universal nor recommended. In my experience, division is symbolized with a slash in the real world so I never see the sign outside of an education setting. Unless taught this sign in an Anglophone primary school, one may almost never come across it and may look very strange when it is encountered—and I'm not sure how else one would look for it if they don't know the name of it. -- Tavix (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "6. Writing Systems and Punctuation". The Unicode® Standard: Version 10.0 – Core Specification (PDF). Unicode Consortium. June 2017. p. 280, Obelus.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yukariko

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple fictional characters with this name, none of whom are particularly notable or ubiquitously known only by their given name. A name list article comprised only of fictional characters is not helpful, so a reader would be better served by a redlink. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kanchanaganga

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC; could also refer to Kanchana Ganga UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

UFN 176

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 22:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like this redirect deleted because UFN 176 was caused by sock puppetry. — 29cwcst (talk) 01:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Welsh mountains

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep without retargeting. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of Nuttall mountains in England and Wales#Nuttall mountains in Wales by height is probably the best option here in absence of a non-list covering this topic. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

West of the Rhymney

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; this does not seem to be an alternative name for the target. This was created by Rhymney, who has two surviving edits: one to create their userpage, and one to create this redirect. The redirect seems to refer to Rhymney. Search results: [4]. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The redirect has slightly more views than normal for a highly implausible redirect, maybe this signals usage? It may just be web crawlers targeting highly important articles' redirects more, however. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It almost certainly actually refers to the Rhymney River, but this is not a logical or traditional boundary river (e.g. the River Loughor forms the West Wales-South Wales border). The target is especially bad because most of Wales is north of this river and a substantial part is east, including part of the capital Cardiff. Search results only find things that happen to be immediately west of the river (or its valley, or the railway line that runs in the valley) in the same way as e.g. "west of the Tawe" or "west of the Exe". Thryduulf (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Globomedia

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is an unrelated Spanish company known as Globomedia with articles on eswiki (es:Globomedia) and others. There's no connection with Grupo Globo in Brazil. Search results exclusively turn up material related to the Spanish media company. Raymie (t • c) 00:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Article-ify - I don't speak Spanish, but given the extensive coverage on the Spanish wiki the Globomedia company seems notable in its own right and should probably have an EN article. Could potentially request a translation of the Spanish article, if anyone is familiar with that process. BlackholeWA (talk) 10:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation, or stubify with a couple of solid citations to hold it in place. It cannot stay as it is, it's badly misleading as to continent, language and ownership. Narky Blert (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I created the redirect as I worked for media company and so was aware of their name change. I have been redundant from that job due to the impact of covid so if you want to delete it, do so, I was just trying to increase wikipedias coverage of media company's in general. I ask only that you get someone actively working in media in the discussion and who speaks Spanish before a decision is made. Back ache (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. With due respect to (and sympathy with) user:Back ache, without explanation the current situation is just confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation per Narky Blert. CycloneYoris talk! 08:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DOAW

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not even a complete acronym for the series: it's DOAWK or DoaWK, not DOAW. Delete, it's highly unlikely that people would search for this unfinished redirect. Scrooge200 (talk) 22:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_24&oldid=966305478"