Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 14

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

July 14

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 14, 2019.

Rito (race)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Improperly disambiguated; it would require the (fictional race) to clarify that it is not in fact a real race. Confusing redirect, should be deleted. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Legendary Blade

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overly vague of a fantasy term to point here. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

RasPutin

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unlikely typo of Rasputin. It receives a fair number of pageviews because it is the first likely option listed in the popup window when someone searches for "rasputin" (looking for Grigori Rasputin). It appears this redirect is actually suppressing the much-more-appropriate "Rasputin" in the search popup. CThomas3 (talk) 23:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Recurring enemies in The Legend of Zelda series

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Recurring enemies in The Legend of Zelda. Withdrawn by nominator per the creator's comment. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:34, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell only characters are mentioned in the list, not "recurring enemies". ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords subseries characters

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The use of "subseries" here makes it implausible as a redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While the content has actually been merged into Tingle, this is an implausible redirect and looking at the pageviews, almost no one searches for such a specific list. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mrs. Bill Clinton

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 25#Mrs. Bill Clinton

Mohammad Irfan (cricketer)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Störm moved page Mohammad Irfan to Mohammad Irfan (cricketer) by reason that he is not primary. But this was reverted after User:StAnselm's request. I re-targeted Mohammad Irfan (cricketer) to Mohammad Irfan (disambiguation) by reason of many cricketers named Mohammad Irfan. But User:StAnselm re-targeted to Mohammad Irfan. Mohammad Irfan already occupies itself as the primary topic. I want to retarget to Mohammad Irfan (disambiguation) or delete. Sawol (talk) 21:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But if the cricketer is the primary topic for Mohammad Irfan, then obviously he is the primary topic for Mohammad Irfan (cricketer). StAnselm (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ferrari 850 Monza

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No such car existed. No reason for anyone to search for it. Nearest correct name is Ferrari 860 Monza. YBSOne (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ferrari 315 MM

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No such car existed. No reason for anyone to search for it. Correct name is Ferrari 315 S. YBSOne (talk) 21:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J.R.R. Tolkien's

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 30#J.R.R. Tolkien's

George W.Bush

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing errors. Redirects like this have been rejected before (for example, § James M.Cox, Jr., § Rodham,Hillary, § List of Wii Ugames, § Pauloftarsus, etc.). — the Man in Question (in question) 20:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alexander-the-great

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 29#Alexander-the-great

Dr.martin luther king jr.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing error. There is an abundance of Martin Luther King redirects, and this one is unhelpful. Compare § James M.Cox, Jr., § Rodham,Hillary, § List of Wii Ugames, § Pauloftarsus, etc. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Queen Victoria I

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Queen Victoria II. WP:CRYSTAL. A Pandora's Box, since this could be applied to any monarch, political leader, etc. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This isn't about CRYSTAL, but plausible redirects and pipes. "Vict. I" for instance would be in the name of legislation passed in 1837–8 and might be linked from an article about such legislation. As for the others, just because we know there is no I without II, doesn't mean that all editors ever seeking to link to Victoria in passing know that. DBD 20:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. These are plausible because it's common in some realms to use "the first" even if there is only a single ruler with this name. See Regnal number#"The first" for more information. -- Tavix (talk) 21:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Queen Victoria is still the first Victoria, regardless if there aren't any more after or not. The redirects are fine. Utopes (talk) 17:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arnold S.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a common nickname for Arnold Schwarzenegger. There are many Arnold S.'s (such as Arnold Schoenberg, Arnold Sommerfeld, Arnold Stang, Arnold Sodeman, etc.). Delete to allow the search engine to do its work. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tarid

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in target article. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

David Peckham

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling. Meanwhile, as there are people actually named "David Peckham", WP:SURPRISE. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tont

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A middle name is not a helpful redirect if the target is not known by the middle name. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mr. Aaron

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Aaron (surname). --BDD (talk) 21:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be based on a fictional pseudonym used in an obscure film from 2009. Not a plausible search term. A middle name is not a helpful redirect. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elvis McPresley

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To quote McConfucius, "Seems to be nonsense." — the Man in Question (in question) 19:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elvis Pres;ey

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 21:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of typo is a Pandora's Box. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. l and ; are right next to each other on the QWERTY keyboard. Though, it makes me wonder why this isn't E;vis Pres;ey then... and why that specific typo? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete mistakes such as this are obvious, and can be corrected. Peter James (talk) 22:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per {{R from misspelling}}. Redirects take people where they want to go, and it's obvious that someone typing this is wanting the article for Elvis Presley. -- Tavix (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, the redirect is a plausible typo that could be encountered, even if it has never been encountered by anyone here. The two characters are a button away, and should stay as a redirect. Utopes (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. If they can type the "l" in "Elvis", they can type the "l" in "Presley". This is unlikely because it requires missing the "l" once instead of twice. Steel1943 (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elvis Pres

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a name he is referred to by; not a useful typo. Half-entered search results awaiting autocomplete do not make good redirects. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Merlin Monroe

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely mistake. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ferrari 118L

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No such car existed. Correct name is Ferrari 118 LM (which already exist as a redirect). YBSOne (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Presedent Lincon

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too misspelled to be worthwhile. Triple misspelling in alternate title. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:44, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JEsus

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful capitalization errors. Anyone searching for these will be taken to the correct page regardless of how they capitalize it. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:42, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I find a second capital to be a likely error, so unless technically this is unnecessary, I think this is a good idea to keep. Debresser (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely and common misspellings, and JEsus actually reminds me of the 16th century German tradition of writing "HErr" and "GOtt" for "Lord" and "God". But I don't know whether that has been done in English, ever. However, if these redirects don't exist, the software automatically redirects search entries, so the only issue is links. Given the low use I'd say delete both to let the software work its magic. —Kusma (t·c) 15:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Barack Obama.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stray period. Compare § Daisy Christodoulou., § Fly., § Ancestral Thames., § Myxomatosis., § Flag of the District of Columbia., § War of the Magi., § Final Fantasy 3., § Bob-ombs., § Organisms., § National Maritime Day., § List of retailers' cooperatives., § Same sex marriage is legalized in all 50 US states., § List of cities in Senegal., § Dehydrated., etc. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Useless S. Grant

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible misspelling, appears to be a joke. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:30, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vladimir Poutine

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Either a joke or the French spelling of his name (in which case WP:FORRED). — the Man in Question (in question) 19:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mousie Dung

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a joke. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ferrari 250 gt

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using incorrect names without spaces and/or without capitals, cannot be moved to correct name because they already exists, no links to those pages. Removing those redirects will force editors to use proper name ie 250 GT. Please consider deletion. YBSOne (talk) 19:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sakhar

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Also restored the previous redirects from moves. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear from the target why this (misspelling?) redirects here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ferrari 290MM

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using incorrect name without spaces, cannot be moved to correct name because it already exists, no links to this page. Removing this redirect will force editors to use proper name ie 290 MM. Please consider deletion. YBSOne (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jumpy bugs

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Internet searches aren't showing any association of this very vague and informal term with any particular group of "bugs". Plantdrew (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

El Camino High School (disambiguation page)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy Delete. Deleted by User:RHaworth per WP:G7 (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created this without realizing that it has the wrong qualifier (should be just 'disambiguation'), and El Camino High School (disambiguation) already exists. Leschnei (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Omega System

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Omega (navigation system). --BDD (talk) 21:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as overly vague, generic sci-fi term. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chaos (Xenosaga Character)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary incorrect disambiguation. Note Chaos (Xenosaga) already exists. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xenosaga lists

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessarily vague redirect; there are no longer multiple lists for the series. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anti-drug campaigns

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

General redirect to a specific target. A bit misleading: obviously "drug" refers to more than just cannabis/marijuana, and there are many campaigns against all sorts of drugs other than cannabis/marijuana. I don't necessarily want to see this redirect deleted, as it is potentially useful. And a reader might still find certain anti-drug campaigns among those listed in the target (perhaps the list should be split?) So ideally, I would prefer to have this redirect point to a better target if one can be found. -- Ϫ 05:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_14&oldid=1171579391"