Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 16

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

June 16

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 16, 2016.

Paříži

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN; the language I hit on was Czech. -- Tavix (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

URESWNI

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an obscure acronym. Searching this acronym on Google only gives me ~60 results, and it's not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. -- Tavix (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bản mẫu:Traffic law

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use Vietnamese namespace names on English Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Axxter99/San religion navbox

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create subpages to the author's user name in the article namespace and redirect them to templates. Stefan2 (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Format: Reşiţa Demographics

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use Romanian namespace names on English Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Templates:Mayo Women's Football League teams

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: extra "s". Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tempate:Hong Kong Kwai Tsing Council Constituencies

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing "l". Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emplate:Current Top 10 WSA Rankings

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing "t". Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template Dartford F.C.

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing colon. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United Kingdoom

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While this is a misspelling, the use of the word "doom" might be bordering on WP:R#D3 territory due to it's negative connotations. -- Tavix (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tempate:Duffy-Electric Railways

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing "l". Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template Gribovsky aircraft

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing colon. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

HBWQ2016OG

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chief Justices of Commonwealth countries

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Barry Bowden

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect must've been meant to link to a section on the player on that page (we use these pages to incubate biographies that are near but not yet notable per GNG). But there's nothing here on this individual as the player has been inactive since 2010. There's no reason to keep this redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Useless redirect for a former minor leaguer. Penale52 (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stanford swimmer

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This redirect title is too vague. There are dozens of notable Stanford swimmers; to make it be specifically about this subject is WP:RECENTISM. There is already a redirect from "Stanford rapist", isn't that enough? MelanieN (talk) 18:52, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford rapist is a BLP problem since the rape charges against Brock were dropped. Him being known as a swimmer is not controversial though. Ranze (talk) 00:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Europe/Luxembourg

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus is that the current targets are inappropriate and that there is not an appropriate retargeting option available. I think it's reasonable that this consensus should apply to the other redirects currently at Category:Redirects from a tzid, so those will be taken care of also. -- Tavix (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What a can of worms! First, I just came across "Europe/Luxembourg". I thought this would be a very old link that just meant Luxembourg, but apparently it's a way of denoting a time zone. Now, with this notation, how does, say, Europe/Oslo differ from Europe/Amsterdam? And they from Central European Time?

It got worse when I investigated the matter further. So far, I've only looked at the European members of Category:Redirects from a tzid. Should these have their own articles, like the ones on Oslo and Amsterdam? Should they redirect to a list, like Zagreb does? Simply to the city they correspond to (I oppose this as unhelpful)? Relevant articles on time in that area? Or should we just delete the lot? --BDD (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) with me adding the additional entries. --BDD (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like all but 3 of them may qualify for WP:G5. Europe/Andorra and Europe/Zagreb were redirects created by the ban-evading sock that were converted to articles by a different editor, but were then reconverted to redirects. Europe/Nicosia was created by a different editor than the ban-evading sock. Steel1943 (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Name of Luxembourg

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 28#Name of Luxembourg

Buildings in Denmark timeline

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jayme Mathias Rincão

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

April 27-30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Turin Group B table

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ademar Pimenta

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oklahoma City Barons roster

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#Oklahoma City Barons roster

April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Non-controversial maintenance to remove this page. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Animation industry in the People's Republic of China

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Chinese animation. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Could maybe be retargeted to Chinese animation or something. Stefan2 (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anatomical terminology series

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American University leaders

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to List of American University people. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Al-Faisaly FC (Harmah) squad

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Al-Faisaly FC#Players. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support the refined target of Al-Faisaly FC#Players per Tavix below. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2016 in Chinese football

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2016 in Chinese football

2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B3

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2015 Toyota Four Nations Cup Philippines men's basketball team roster

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2012 CECAFA Cup scorers

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to 2012 CECAFA Cup statistics. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. {{R with history}}, and retargeted in 2015. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010-11 in Egyptian football

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2010-11 in Egyptian football

2009 in Malaysian football

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2009 in Malaysian football

1996-97 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1974-75 in German football

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#1974-75 in German football

Adios Mother

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn/retarget to Long Island Iced Tea#Variations. Steel1943 (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the redirect is not mentioned in the target article, so the connection is unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The section was deleted at some point. I added it back in. --evrik (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. I'm going to withdraw this. Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Strike terms

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's unclear what "terms" refers to in the target article. The article has history as an article, but it seems to just be a list of Internet slang. Steel1943 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Strike culture

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect seems misleading since the subject of the redirect (as well as the word "culture") does not seem present in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but the history looks like annex sorry from Pubnoob. (Also currently nominated for RfD.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-smack

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The term is not mentioned at the target. The redirect has history as an article, but the article looks like a combination of a WP:NOTWIKIA fail and Internet trolling. Steel1943 (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Camper-strike

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per search engines, the subject of this redirect seems like a parody video game created in 2005 based on the target in name alone. Either way, the redirect is not mentioned at the target. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Phoenix Connexion

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect seems to not be mentioned or identified in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Connexion is one of the more memorable enemy models in the CS franchise [3]. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dust2

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but the article would probably fail WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 15:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Female Counter-Strike

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's unclear what this redirect is supposed to identify. So, is there a "Male Counter-Strike"? Steel1943 (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pubnoob

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Strike Spray

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the redirect seems to not be mentioned in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but it seems as though the article would fail WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Awp delay

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Per the redirect's history as an article, it looks as though the article would have failed WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 13:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1996 Port Adelaide Magpies premiership players

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Jenks24 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1996–97 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2014–15 European Rugby Challenge Cup Pool 1 table

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2014–15 NBL season by team

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2015 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to 2015 MLS Cup Playoffs#Bracket. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support the refined target of 2015 MLS Cup Playoffs#Bracket suggested by Tavix below. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B2

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bandy clubs from minor countries

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing redirect. The target deals with bandy clubs from all countries, not just 'minor'[clarification needed] countries. Stefan2 (talk) 11:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Antarctica in fiction

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing cross-namespace redirect. I'd expect an article which discusses Antarctica, not a category. Stefan2 (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. If there's critical and literary analysis, an article can be created, but I'm afraid it will end up more like a bunch of lists, of which the Category will already cover. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Buccaneers2015DraftPicks

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a template which seems to be related to 2015 NFL Draft. I wouldn't expect a cross-namespace redirect here. A redirect to the article namespace could maybe be expected, but I don't know where. Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Code of Honor 3: Desperate Measures

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any connection between the redirect title and its target. It's possible that the redirect title is a game which was or will be published in the specified year, but the redirect isn't useful as the category page doesn't mention this. Tagged {{R from move}}, but no page with this title has been moved to the category namespace. One page was moved to the draft namespace and later deleted, though. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Matterfall

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 28#Matterfall

Canadian electoral calendar, 2017

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was article created. Thanks to 117Avenue for doing the legwork. -- Tavix (talk) 23:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected target. I'd expect a list article, like Canadian electoral calendar, 2016. Stefan2 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canadian electoral calendar, 2018

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was article created by 117Avenue. JohnCD (talk) 11:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected target. I'd expect a list article, like Canadian electoral calendar, 2016. Stefan2 (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of A-League players

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as a list. Any request for deletion should now go toAfD. JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected redirect. I'd expect a list article under this title, not a redirect to a category. This used to be a list article before this change. Stefan2 (talk) 11:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I turned it back into a list, keep as out of scope, and take the list to RFD AFD rather than deleting it by stealth please. Siuenti (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the list as a list and remove the redirect. GiantSnowman 07:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect There's a lot of issues with this list and I'm not sure if it's notability. The issues I can see are it's not up to date (content hasn't been updated since 2013 or 2014). It's not ordered by family names. I just don't see what it adds when the category and player pages tells the same thing. --SuperJew (talk) 06:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment my thoughts as original creator of this list. This list has gotten to a point where it is too long and out of date to ever be completed in its current form. There could/should be a page under this title which limits players included by a certain minimum number of A-League appearances obtained (see for example List of Premier League players), pending decision as to what the appropriate number should be (no A-League player has 300 appearances (as is used in the Premier League list) yet) (200 seems appropriate to me (for now at least)). I don't think a redirect is helpful here. Macosal (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Currently, a list of over-200 caps players will be 12 players, which is 2 more than the current table on the records page. Also I think that there's an issue that there aren't enough editors who will upkeep this. I can probably count on one hand the amount of editors currently active on A-League pages. --SuperJew (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • 12 right now, but likely to become over twenty within the next season (WP:CRYSTAL, I know - but if there were, say 20 or more, would your view change?). Such a list would also contain more detail than the records page list does. I don't think upkeep is an issue here - at minimum, this list would only require one update per season (and I would be more than happy to take an active role in creating/updating this page more regularly than that). But I do agree with you that the low editor number is a consideration in favour of reducing the current list which is far too lengthy to be maintained. Macosal (talk) 09:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep list. If deletion is sought, it's now in the hands of AfD. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AI accelerator

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move List of AI accelerators to this title. JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected target. I'd expect to find an article about accelerators under this title, not a category. Stefan2 (talk) 11:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

information on AI accelerators is thin on the ground at the minute. I was thinking of Movidius VPU, Zeroth NPU, TrueNorth, google TPU (which wasn't even announced when I made the link) - and there's probably more to come. I would certainly agree it would make sense to see an AI accelerator article. How about linking to a glossary def in Glossary of computer hardware terms#AI accelerator? or what about a List of AI accelerators page to bridge the gap? Also at the minute there is no consensus on the 'collective noun'; vendors are trying to claim the space as their own and pushing their own terms; indeed there *are* differences in how they operate, which are better described in specific implementations. It mirrors the evolution of graphics hardware, where there were many accelerators and eventually everyone adopted Nidia's GPU as the "collective noun" (which originally, was a vendor-specific term). I think we should have a wikipedia article dealing with these accelerators under a neutral term before any one vendor claims the entire space. On another note, couldn't the wikimedia platform be extended to handle list-of/categories more seamlessly IMO when there is ambiguity about which to use it points to software features or options yet to be added.. I think glossaries,lists,categories could be unified, e.g. imagine if you had a 'micro article' template that specifies a trivial page is really intended to have its content added to a list, and if regular pages could also mark summary text). Such lists would then benefit from the ability of the software to sort (e.g. intersections) Fmadd (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

History of Indermark

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A person has created the article and has repeatedly been reverted back to this redirect. Indermark, the redirect target, is an infobox and one sentence. Any "history" material can go on Indermak. Bgwhite (talk) 06:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hovito

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a WP:PTM since Jay Z has a song called "Hola' Hovito." There's another minor use of "Hovito:" a tribe in Indiana Jones. I think search results would be better here. -- Tavix (talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Formation (album)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 23#Formation (album)

BEONCE

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:RCAPS combined with a typo makes this an obscure redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 05:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eslovênia

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN, the language I'm getting is Brazilian Portuguese. -- Tavix (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Run the World Tour

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chasewc91 tagged this with R3, which I undid because this redirect was not recently created. However, I agree that it is not a plausible search term. SSTflyer 04:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beaded

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bead (disambiguation). -- Tavix (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a bit of an WP:XY situation between Bead and Beadwork. Either delete or retarget to Wiktionary (wikt:beaded). Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment It's a coin toss. Beadwork involves more stitching and sewing, while there's beaded curtains, which are just curtains made of strings of beads. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although it appears to be the situation in WP:XY, that essay is misleading as usually disambiguation pages or hatnotes are used (if the title can refer to any of multiple topics), or the redirect is pointed at one of the possible targets (where the topics are closely related and easily accessible from each other, as is the case here), only being deleted when multiple topics are mentioned in the title of the redirect (as in all of the examples). This redirect is more likely to be used by people looking for the adjective rather than the verb, so bead is a better redirect, but it may be better to disambiguate with bead and bead (woodworking) as the primary topic is less certain (either a separate disambiguation page or redirect to the existing one). Beadwork could be added, but I don't know how likely it is; it hasn't been added to the bead (disambiguation) page. Peter James (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget/disambiguate at Bead (disambiguation). Deryck C. 15:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big elvis

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pete Vallee (and create Big Elvis). -- Tavix (talk) 23:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Not finding any references of the redirect and the target having any citable connection. Unavoidable WP:SURPRISE because ... Elvis. Steel1943 (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was about to essentially withdraw this discussion with the "retarget" suggestion above, but then I remembered a concern I found while looking up the term "Big Elvis" on search engines. Of course, almost all results were about Elvis, so I wonder if this retarget would still cause a WP:SURPRISE issue. Either way, I now support the retarget to Pete Vallee option slightly over deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It could always be hatnoted to Elvis Presley since of course he's bigger than any Big Elvises. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Three month VfD policy

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus between deleting and retargeting to Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits. This will default to retarget as the alternative to deletion since no one wants it kept as it. -- Tavix (talk) 23:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because it might cause confusion. The redirect was created in 2005, seemingly as part of a different policy discussion, WP:GNAA votes for deletion policy (marked inactive) which is the only incoming link to this redirect. The current target does not discuss the matter. Relevant pages, WP:Guide to deletion#Can I recreate an article that was deleted in the past?, WP:CSD#G5 and WP:Recreation of previously deleted pages, do not discuss three months and the latter is "failed" anyway. Sometimes a three-month waiting period is suggested (for example at DRV) but this is only on an ad hoc basis. Thincat (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Etre

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion established that it's not a good idea to redirect a french verb to an article on its conjugation. This originally targeted Romance copula, is that a better target or is it best to delete it? -- Tavix (talk) 04:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - they both actually target the section in French conjugation where this verb is conjugated. Also note the discussion link seems to be broken, I'm guessing because of all the collapses on the page. If you click through and end up on the bottom of the page, scroll up a bit to the discussion on redirects from various verb conjugations. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I think that discussion establised that it's not a good idea to redirect from the conjugated verb to an article on its conjugation, but these are both infinitive forms and match the section header at the article (French conjugation#Être). I think that makes them okay. I also think we could hatnote to the essay from the section in the conjugation article, as see-also or related reading. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The infinitives were also deleted: Vouloir, Avoir, Ouvrir, and Pouvoir. (Parler, Partir, and Avenir have other meanings). -- Tavix (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stewart Parnell

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Peanut Corporation of America. -- Tavix (talk) 22:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what to do with this one. This was created a redirect to Peanut Corporation of America, as it is the name of one of the company's executives. A year and a half later, an IP retargeted it to its current target. There's absolutely no doubt that the Irish leader is primary topic over the peanut executive. But I don't think he was ever referred to solely by his middle and last names. A quick look at "stewart parnell" suggests the peanut executive might be sufficiently notable for a standalone article. For now, I would say retarget to the original article, Peanut Corporation of America, or delete. BDD (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Charles Stewart Parnell is undoubtedly the primary topic here and his name is well known. I looked at Google and saw quite a few results about the peanut executive, but unless someone creates an article on the executive then I think it should stay as it is. If someone does create an article, then maybe a disambig page would be more appropriate. st170etalk 14:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does he go by Stewart though? That determines whether it should be the primary topic. If he doesn't, then the peanut guy should get the redirect and then hatnote to Charles AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a look through Google because I was convinced that some history books referred to him as Stewart Parnell, but in all the sources I've found on the news, Charles Stewart Parnell is always given his full name. Stewart Parnell has quite a lot of extensive coverage, albeit for all the wrong reasons so I think therefore that a retarget to Peanut Corporation of America is plausible with a hatnote to CSP. st170etalk 22:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 Malaysia FAM Cup

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; there is no information about the 2017 event at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 01:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 Major League Baseball draft

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; there is no information about the 2017 event at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_16&oldid=1141906130"