Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 27

< February 26	February 28 >

February 27

File:RobinCollins.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Doesn't qualify for fair use on Wikipedia as subject is alive. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar and larger file found here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RockyHolcomb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Doesn't qualify for fair use on Wikipedia as subject is alive. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as fair use here --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stevie Wonder-Everything.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 02:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I believe, the sample may be proven as neither contextually significant to nor necessary to identify the whole song. George Ho (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. George Ho, the song is iconic and the young singer's sound is intrinsic to a reader's understanding. This 12 second sample has been here for 15 years. If you delete this, you might as well delete every song file on Wikipedia. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KamalPatelResearcher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing. 1 of 2 uploads by flickr account. Exif credits "AOUS POULES" to be copyright holder. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SolOrwellEntrepreneur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing. 1 of 2 uploads by flickr account. See above nom for other file. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FTHS Logo - English Version.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free & remove from Florentino Torres. -FASTILY 01:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing. only 3 uploads by flickr account and has been dormant since the uploads. Should be converted to fair use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to non-free and add a valid fair use rationale for use on Florentino Torres High School. Remove from Florentino Torres, as it's not a valid fair use of the non-free logo there (fails WP:NFCC#8). Joseph2302 (talk) 15:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Convert too non-free and limit use to Florentino Torres High School as fair use --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ki-Hong Lee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing. 4 uploads by flickr account, all of varying sizes, and account has been dormant since the uploads. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this file is from https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/modernfamily/images/e/ec/Ki_Hong_Lee.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140302203533, constituting a copyright violation to the source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/127250918@N03/15651984451/. File:Ki Hong Lee by Gage Skidmore.jpg is more appropriate with a proper license and made available to Wikimedia Commons as a free alternative. See also commons:Category:Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials panel at the 2015 Comic-Con International. Chompy Ace 22:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment how do you access the file information from Wikia? https://modernfamily.fandom.com/wiki/Ki_Hong_Lee?file=Ki_Hong_Lee.jpg doesn't provide the file page, Wikia used to have file pages like Commons and Wikipedia, now I'm just getting the file viewer instead. Wikia's general license https://www.fandom.com/licensing would otherwise seem compatible, if the sourcing were fixed. -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - That source dates to March 2, 2014; uploaded that October in Flickr. This may pose a licence laundering problem. Chompy Ace 19:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - What is the license used on Wikia for this image? (as stated, I can't find the file page on Wikia, only the file viewer and the file itself) -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 04:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - Not available, since my previous experience on Wikia that I can find evidence on file's licenses in their pages. Only the content within Wikia (like Wikipedia), including text, is CC-BY-SA compatible. Wikia follows the U.S. law, so such image(s) within this wiki are allowed under its set of circumstances. Unlike Wikia, Wikipedia is more stricter on placing copyrighted images into it than the U.S. law: it has a guildline named WP:NFC and its legal policy WP:NFCC; most of those require sourcing as such. Chompy Ace 04:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewYear2014Doodle.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded with sourced critical commentary explicitly discussing this image in-depth -FASTILY 09:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, as the removal of this image does not significantly reduce the reader's understanding of the topic, as there is no substantial text about this specific Doodle (only a mention of New Year's Doodles in general) Joseph2302 (talk) 14:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The section discusses holiday-themed Doodles, and this is an example of one of them. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - merely illustrating holiday doodles is insufficient to meet WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 02:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sushil Chhetri.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Larger file credits "Shivalal_Shrestha" as author. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sushil Chheetri- Nepalese actor-close up.jpg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.