Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarra Iziah in der Mühlen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tarra Iziah in der Mühlen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no specific criteria for dancers, but does not appear to meet WP:ENT, WP:CREATIVE or even WP:GNG. Time has been left for improvement, but only unsourced additional information is being added. Melcous (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the links under references those are top news portals which cite all the details from her career , not to say compared to other wikis of dancers where there are no references at all and a general lack of modern/urban dancers on Wiki? References regarding Martha Graham dance or Millennium dance are not public but diplomas where submited when those articles where writen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.139.22.41 (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.

Singh (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.

Singh (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.

Singh (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator may well be right, but I'd also suggest she read WP:OVERTAGGING: peppering the article with redundant {{citation needed}} inline templates on each and every statement could be seen as disruptive editing, when a single {{refimprove}} or {{unreferenced}} template atop the article would suffice. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. There has been an unreferenced tag on the article for months, however, and all kinds of information keeps being added without references. I was trying to show the editors that these kinds of claims require sources, but accept that there may have been better ways to do that. Cheers. Melcous (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the refs do seem to be in Croatian so I've added it to the above. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless some Croatian refs turn up. - There do seem to be very few hits indeed once blogs and social media are excluded. Ideally we'd get a Croatian speaker to check this a bit better, but it does look rather WP:TOOSOON for this dancer. The tag-bombing however wasn't necessary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NMODEL applies. If there is any sourcing, she must qualify for an article according to what I read in other AfDs. Legacypac (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. The whole point is that there exactly isn't any sourcing. Advertising herself on social media isn't sourcing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 23:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.