Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jews (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep, WP:POINT. R adiant _>|< 12:12, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jews

What has having jewish ancestry got to do with these peoples occupations? Arniep 02:08, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination; no idea what the point of or how to manage such a list. Jtmichcock 03:13, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Lots of people do know how to manage such a list - RachelBrown 10:36, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG KEEP

All Lists are nominated by Arniep. see [1].

All biographical encyclopedia, "Who's Who", "Persoenlichkeiten" are nominated. It's so crazy.

「努力を尽くした人名一覧（人名百科事典）が、一人の人物によって、すべて削除されようとしている」!! This is Wiki-holocaust!

p.s. to Arniep: Judaism (yahaduth) is not only religion, and Jews is not only ethnic people. see mitzvah, taryag and halakha etc.

これは必要性のある一覧だと思う。If anyone delete, please tell me. I'll move. --Sheynhertz _געשׁ״ך 03:15, 18 November 2005 (UTC) --Sheynhertz _געשׁ״ך 03:59, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please write in English. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm Japanese. ('.') --Sheynhertz _געשׁ״ך 04:31, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But this is the English Wikipedia. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:32, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I don't know what the purpose of this nomination is exactly. Pretty dumb.Vulturell 04:01, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. I don't have an opinion one way or the other on the other articles (except for List of Jewish bankers), but deletion of this one smacks of an agenda. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Comment Considering you voted to delete List of Jewish bankers but don't have an opinion on the other Jewish lists, merely proves an inconsistent and biased (subjective) approach, with an intention of enforcing political-correctness. Ryoung122 09:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Previous AFD ended with a keep, and the reasons there have not been adressed in this renomination. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:38, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, WP:POINT -- Jake 08:24, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In last few month were deleted Lists of Jewish scientists, engineers and so on. An attempts were made to Delete List of Jewish Fellows of Royal Society, historians and List of Jews. There are lot of Such Lists in Wikipedia for various nationalities in Wikipedia.
Can Wikipedia Organisation endorse such Deletions, if apparently the only reason for them is that Jews are ethnic/relgious group and not nationality ? I think that Heads of Wikipedia Organisation have to check this matter thoroughly and pass their Position to Wikipedia users.
In Discussion of Lists of Jewish Publishers Deletion I've already applied to our User, highly qualified attorney, Mr BD2412, and asked him for legal advice on this matter.
LazarKr 09:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm sure no right-minded person really wants Wikipedia to be Judenrein - RachelBrown 10:36, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - By this logic, we should delete articles about famous Rabbis and Jewish notables because they are only significant for being Jewish - Londoneye 11:07, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.