- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails notability test at WP:BIO on points 1, 4, and 6. Subject's only notability is as a child of Peter Jackson. Child is mentioned in both parents' articles. Also not suitable for inclusion per WP:BLP as a private person. Delete -- Malber (talk • contribs) 18:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe later. - Richfife 19:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Usable content has now been merged into 'trivia' section of Peter Jackson. Ohconfucius 02:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Ohconfucius and as per my rationale for Billy Jackson. Bobo. 18:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Grutness...wha? 00:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. No unverifiable content or non-public knowledge included. Agree that it verges on non-notable trivia though, and the important points are covered in Peter Jackson. -- Avenue 01:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.