Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Hellring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Editors arguing ANYBIO should seriously consider showing the "decent amount of coverage" they found; as "meeting one or more [of the ANYBIO criteria] does not guarantee that a subject should be included.", but in any case, the consensus of this discussion is that this should be kept. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Hellring

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not independently notable. Loksmythe (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Loksmythe (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep satisfies GNG. Djflem (talk) 21:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources provided qualify as "significant coverage" (WP:SIGCOV) about the subject. Loksmythe (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Passes WP:ANYBIO criteria 2 as the co-founder of a notable sport. Admittedly sourcing is relatively thin, but his posthumous recognition would seem to pass WP:SUSTAINED. 4meter4 (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For the purposes of making it more clear w.r.t. discerning consensus, would those who are arguing about WP:GNG please provide more in-depth analyses of the sources that they are referencing?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mikehawk10 (talk) 01:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Although the coverage in each source might not be enough to be considered significant, the fact that he's credited in multiple sources as a co-creator of Ultimate Frisbee and was posthumously inducted into the Hall of Fame for the sport, taken together is enough to pass WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO as a person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as they pass ANYBIO and have a decent amount of coverageJackattack1597 (talk) 21:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.