Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Rose (porn star)

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Eugene van der Pijll 15:59, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Rose (porn star)

edit

Google search for amber-rose queefer gives 18 hits, some of which are wikipedia mirrors. Vanity page. Delete. -- Norvy (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This may be because of aliases used when refering to her. Finding her real name was quite a challenge. --Easyas12c 23:04, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep and cleanup Slightly notable (according to Google) porn actress with 1,600 hits. I think this entry is too geared toward her recent work, and should probably be edited with less emphasis on anything in particular that she's done recently and more on her career as a whole and notable films. -Harmil 02:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While a Google search revealed 46700 results, most of the results weren't about her. [1] This indicates that she is not particularly notable. Capitalistroadster 17:03, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Huh?! Because there are more notable "Amber Roses" out there, this one is non-notable?! I suggest you just stick to my results, above. -Harmil 02:41, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(UTC)

  • Keep, clean up and expand: my God that's a double-entendre.
  • Delete, that few hits for a porn actress = non-notable. Dcarrano 22:14, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. The subgenre is very obscure and I couldn't find another as notable porn star on that genre as she is -- Easyrider1283 2005-07-18T01:50:31.0+03:00
  • Keep. She is a genuine adult actress. Agree with Pburka's point about notability. -- Judson 22:58, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. As I already said on the talk page before VfD (with minor corrections)... Queefing genre isn't that big, so basicly anyone who has been in the movies is notable within the genre. And they will be even more notable, if the genre grows huge someday. So either it is reported as a shortly fading phenomenon or a huge success. So notable anyway I'd say. If there are lots of pornstars specialised in queefing who have been in the genre before 2002, then I guess that would make her less notable. --Easyas12c 23:07, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notable genre actress. JamesBurns 08:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Trivial and unnecessary. CalJW 13:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets the Google test for me. Impurience of her field is not reason for deletion. Xoloz 17:41, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and cleanup Enough Google hits for me.-- Grpunkim 19:28, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep only with expansion. measurements would be a plus --fpo 01:26, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- BRIAN0918  00:19, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amber_Rose_(porn_star)&oldid=1079904930"