Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Latest comment: 5 minutes ago by IjonTichyIjonTichy in topic Reports
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 21:53 on 7 December 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Reports
edit- GameGamingGamer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 10:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Srinivas. 846402 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1233 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters with no punctuation or markup, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Probably. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Leon119384 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Pekin Bantam was changed by Leon119384 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893817 on 2024-12-07T12:04:17+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 12:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Possible to assume good faith, not convinced this is a block worthy case. PhilKnight (talk) 12:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:a61:12b6:4b01:39e1:b557:1c20:5f1f (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- 120.58.87.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:50, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- 24.140.48.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1307 (LTA 1307, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- 92.53.60.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – WP:vandalism, warned on their tp, but continues with their behaviour. Theonewithreason (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- 77.244.117.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – long term disruptive editing, warned on their tp page, the geolocation suggest that this person uses multiple ip with same disruptive behaviour i.e [[1]], [[2]], [[3]] etc. Theonewithreason (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. I don't see any vandalism. What I see is on the one hand an editor who evidently believes that being a runner up or a nominee for an award isn't enough of an honour to be included in listings, and on the other hand an editor who thinks it is, and who for some reason doesn't accept that anyone can in good faith believe otherwise. JBW (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am not the only one who is reverting them [[4]]. Theonewithreason (talk) 21:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. I don't see any vandalism. What I see is on the one hand an editor who evidently believes that being a runner up or a nominee for an award isn't enough of an honour to be included in listings, and on the other hand an editor who thinks it is, and who for some reason doesn't accept that anyone can in good faith believe otherwise. JBW (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- 147.105.254.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism-only account. -- Ijon Tichy (talk) 21:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)