Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Proposed deletion of Liu Kan (general)

edit
 

The article Liu Kan (general) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seriously? This is embarrassing. An unsourced 7-word sentence fails every conceivable notability criterion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 01:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Testimoines about combat actions of 8° and 4° Route Communist Armies and other units of chinese forces has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4 § Testimoines about combat actions of 8° and 4° Route Communist Armies and other units of chinese forces until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Kang Zhan" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Kang Zhan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4 § Kang Zhan until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Li Xianzhou for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Li Xianzhou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Xianzhou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chinese propaganda (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Chinese propaganda (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Chinese propaganda" is not ambiguous.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply