Umedard

Archive(s)

Archive: 1

Welcome, too :)

A dyskusję najlepiej archiwizować przenosząc ją z całą historią (Special:Movepage/User talk:Umedard). Paweł ze Szczecina 18:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Concerning 'Controversial Incidents involving Jarosław Kaczyński

Medard, neither of us wants a forth-and-back reverting orgy on that topic. Please have a look at the discussion page of that article (here). I left you a comment at the bottom and would like to discuss the issue with you. Best regards.

Transliteration policy

As a member of WikiProject Ukraine, you are invited to participate in the discussion about transliteration of Ukrainian words. I would appreciate your participation. Discussion is located here. Thank you. — Alex^(U|C|E) 17:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Award

I have proposed an award at the Ukraine Wikiproject - You appear to be a member of the project and I would like some feedback from you - thanks // Finns

Hello

I'm working on some Polish political articles (routine maintenance) and could either use the help of a bot or a contributor like you. Any advice? TableManners 03:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Jarosław Kaczyński

Hi, I noticed you removed the link to far right in Jarosław Kaczyński. Although the matter is debatable, I personally reckon Kaczynski would comfortably fit into the "normal right" in the United States, but NOT in Europe. His vociferous support of the death penalty and his publicly flaunted homophobia, Germanophobia and bigotry put him very, very far to the right of mainstream European politics. Indeed, I'd be curious to see if you can find any European Prime Minister farther to the right than Kaczynski... Cheers! --Targeman 16:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Lublin Voivodeship

This is to inform you that the above project page is being considered for deletion. Please feel free to take part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Lublin Voivodeship. Thank you. John Carter 21:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kaczynski.jpg

You uploaded the image Image:Kaczynski.jpg which is now on Commons. The image is up for deletion is a copyright violation as it also appears on http://www.kprm.gov.pl/s.php?bio=72&path=3252. Evil Monkey - Hello 03:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:Abramów Commune

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Abramów Commune, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Abramów Commune has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Abramów Commune, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:PiS

Template:PiS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Sardanaphalus (talk) 04:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Umedard/articles

Doing regular housekeeping on Category:Template loop warnings I noticed that one of your userpages, User:Umedard/articles, includes a template loop. Since you allready have a page User:Umedard/Articles (with capital "A") you may want to blank this page or delete it. You can do that by adding {{db-userreq}} on top of it. Debresser (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pagan reaction in Czech

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pagan reaction in Czech, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 14:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland

We are now dividing our members into active, semi-active (have not edited a Poland-related article in more then three months or have 10 or less edits per month on average) and inactive (have not edited at all for three months or more). You occasionally edit Poland-related articles but have few edits in the past months; we are moving you to semi-active members category. Please consider participating in our project activities again in the future, we would love to work more closely with you again! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Lubartow.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lubartow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 23:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lubartow1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Lubartow1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 02:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zamek-poznan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Zamek-poznan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 08:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Umedard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 26 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Wojciech Szczurek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Anna Borucka-Cieślewicz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Wojciech Borzuchowski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Andrzej Diakonow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Józef Fortuna - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Hanna Mierzejewska - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Marek Muszyński - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Ryszard Nowak - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Jacek Sauk - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Bartłomiej Szrajber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Kirchholm.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kirchholm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Lubartów.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lubartów.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Lubartow10-m.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lubartow10-m.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011 For our freedom and yours Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper). Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop: we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 80,000 pages as Poland-related, out of which 1,500 still need a quality assessment, and 20,000, importance assessment. we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. once an article is assessed it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions. you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is another good place to watchlist!) also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, and its creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project we are maintaining a Portal:Poland automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s) This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools! With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself? You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michnikowszczyzna. Zapis choroby

The article Michnikowszczyzna. Zapis choroby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article stands totally unsourced, and it is impossible therefore to gauge it's notability. As it is unsourced, I am suggesting deletion until such time as reliable sources are found for this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Russavia ^{ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)} 14:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:250px-PIS.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:250px-PIS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Herb annopol.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herb annopol.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Herb zwierzyniec.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herb zwierzyniec.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II For our freedom and yours Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper). Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members! In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop: we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages? assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide. once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions. you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content) we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here. also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!). did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content. we are maintaining a Portal:Poland automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s) Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details. This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools! With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself? It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :) You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland. Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings. Newsletter prepared by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Speedy deletion nomination of Lewart Lubartów

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lewart Lubartów requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fenix down (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nasze Miasto Lublin

The article Nasze Miasto Lublin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Warsaw landmarks

Template:Warsaw landmarks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kochas (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sekta Niebo

The article Sekta Niebo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable sect. All external links dead. Pl.wiki article appears to be sourced to blogs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lubart3.jpg

The file File:Lubart3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

"1998 Polish local elections" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1998 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#1998 Polish local elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrei (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

"1994 Polish local elections" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1994 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#1994 Polish local elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrei (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

"1990 Polish local elections" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1990 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#1990 Polish local elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrei (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)