This user may have left Wikipedia. Sushiflinger has not edited Wikipedia since June 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Below is a shoutbox where smaller comments are posted for rapid communications between online users. Comments here are erased within some time. This useful tool avoids the over-flooding in talk pages and makes ease of coordination. You can always check if this user is online by writing "are you there?" or something like that. It's supposed to be in the talk page, so the user receive immediate notification of a new message.
*Hello!!! A while back i did this intended as humor but as you aren't around i undid it out of fairplay. Cheers, benzband (talk) 23:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
* Hi! Just for curiosity, what would you say that is your specialty here on wikipedia? - Woglinde 02 (talk) 02:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)* Hello, what are your main contributions to wikipedia (pehaps I can join too, but I wanted to ask first). - 189.216.137.0 (talk)
* Reply
Hello, Sushiflinger. You have new messages at Damërung's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
*
Hello, Sushiflinger. You have new messages at Damërung's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
* Thanks for the barnstar, I really apreciate it as well as all your collboration and help with the template. By the way, check this test, now the {{tb}} template fits in a better place (score one more for the Shoutbox, lol). - Damërung...ÏìíÏ..._Ξ_. -- 06:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please make comments at the top. Click here to shout!
Hi sushi, thank you for putting my page back up, but it's marked for deletion, despite the fact I wrote it well and people were liking it, it seems it NEEDS sources other than my play so I thought I'd save everyone time by deleting it and marking it for speedy deletion? TheatreMaker
Just read it, it is completely without context and makes no sense from a scientific perspective. We don't have access to the original reference which might offer some explanation as to what the scientists were actually saying, but I'm sure it wasn't this. --72.208.49.22 (talk) 22:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi
You have marked the KernelCAD article as an ad
I have rewrote it to leave information only. It was the original intention. Do you think it is OK now? I am a newbie to Wikipedia. Is there a procedure for submitting it for a review?
Thanks
Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickdi2012 (talk • contribs) 06:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Shoutbox
