User talk:SMcCandlish/Barnstars

I'm archiving copies of barnstars and similar kudos here, since it's hard to remember where they are in over 100 archive pages. Skimming this reminds me of the great things about this project and its editorial community, when certain participants in it get me down from time to time.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  21:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Chapeau

... for this one! Cheers - DVdm (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I actually like hats. :-) Your readability tweak was a good idea. I was a little concerned about it myself, but I'm not a cards editor, so I wasn't sure if there was a typical way of making hands more legible. (Also not sure if people conventionally use the card symbols that are available in Unicode, etc.). I do edit a lot of games articles, but almost exclusively in cue sports and related. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 12:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I specially like hats when there's a set of dice under them :-)

Perhaps you don't know, but overhere we use the name chapeau for the cup and, by extension, for the game itself. As you can see here—als je Nederlands een beetje in orde is—, we play an entirely different game with it, a game where one can practice the fine art of subtle bluffing, downright lying, assessing oponents' behaviour, and accurately estimating probabilities. We also play the "Mexican" variant, which is even subtler. Check it out and cheers! - DVdm (talk) 18:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I didn't know that, about the chapeau. I thought you were awarding me a virtual hat. :-) . I am familiar with the bluff game (possibly the Mexican version, since I learned it in California), but have always played that one with regular dice. Anyway, if you like what I did in the English version, certainly feel free to "port" it to the Netherlands Wikipedia. I may be able to work through the Dutch enough to add something about the other variants to the English article here, since it is rather paltry. Heh. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 04:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Actually, it was meant as a virtual hat award as well - I had seen a hat on your user page :-)

Porting from there to here could be a bit problematic, as there's not many sources around, alas. - DVdm (talk) 17:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll have to dig through my game encyclopedias and stuff. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 17:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, if you find something, please let know. I'd be glad to work on it together. Cheers and happy digging. - DVdm (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Cheers!

		A beer on me!
		for all of the thoughtful posts through the extended discussion at MOSCAPS. I've appreciated it. JHunterJ (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank ya verra much! I was thirsty. >;-) — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 15:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar Creator's Barnstar
		Thank you for your submission of the Instructor's Barnstar. It's now on the main barnstar list. Pinetalk 15:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Keen beans! Thanks.

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	This comes as a recognition of your kindness in developing the Firefox Cite4wiki add-on. It has been helpful and a great resource. I was also happy to learn you contribute to Mozilla which I do as well :) ₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 18:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, though some others deserve more credit than I do, especially Jehochman (talk · contribs) for the original concept, and Unit 5 (talk · contribs) for the bulk of the code still used in this version. I mostly just added the ability to customize the output for specific sites, and fixed some consistency issues, as well as set up the WP:Cite4Wiki page for it. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 21:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Socratic Barnstar
		In recognition of your general fine work around the 'pedia, and the staunchness and standard of argumentation on style issues. And if for nothing else, I think you deserve it for this comment  Ohconfucius ping / poke 02:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

<bow> — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 07:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	It's a bit delayed, but for your rather accurate edit summary here. Keep up the good work on various breed articles! TKK bark ! 18:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Why, thank ya verra much!  :-) — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖ^⊝כ^⊙þ Contrib. 20:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Heroic Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your recent work at WP:MOS: A model of unflagging effort, precise analysis, institutionally broad and historically deep vision, clear articulation, and civil expression under great pressure. Unforgettable. DocKino (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I do my best. At this point I'm being attacked on multiple pages in a concerted effort of harassment, and suspect that their goal is to get me to simply quit the project. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 18:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Some Wiki-love for you

		The Purple Barnstar
		You've been putting up with a lot of crap from other quarters; just want to let you know that people out there do, in fact, manage to appreciate your work. illegitimi non carborundum! VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 04:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. That means a lot right now, actually. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖ^⊝כ^⊙þ Contrib. 11:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	I couldn't quite find a suitable barnstar for this, but I found it insightful when you brought up the issue of accessibility within TfD#Template:Tn. Maybe it was kind of a small realization you had, but on behalf of the disabled friends I have, thank you for bringing it up. A step in the right direction for making this everyone's encyclopedia. Meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. As someone with really poor eyesight, {{tn}} has actually meant something to me from an accessbility point of view (honestly, I don't even like that its functionality has been pared to do this {{!}} instead of {{!}} this to begin with, but one thing at a time, I guess.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  03:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Except of course that would be 30 min on the treadmill. But we can still look. Thank you for well measured comments. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

<nom nom nom> Thanks. I'm actually headed to the gym in 15 minutes, coincidentally. Heh.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  03:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

So was I when I sent it, hence the thought... In ictu oculi (talk) 05:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

add this :)

Moved from User:SMcCandlish § Wikawards

		The Fauna Barnstar
		For being an enlightening Star in a farmyard Barn Gregkaye ✍♪ 15:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiCake

Primergrey (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You seem to be among the vanguard in the quest to raise copy editing and style formatting to at least the level of writing barely literate articles. Primergrey (talk) 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. It's one of my more frequent points of focus here.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  14:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

A thank you

		The Special Barnstar
		for disagreeing with reason and cogent arguments backed up by both source and policy as well as logical interpretation of the position you disagree with. In essence for disputing content in a manner that builds consensus. SPACKlick (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

It may seem a little over the top to barnstar for a couple of days work but in an area where there's been entrenched battle ground for so long it has put a huge smile on my face, and moved me on a few of my positions, to be disagreed with in such a consensus building fashion. My faith in wikipedia has been somewhat restored and I can only hope it's a sea change for the way the talk page looks on the articles. SPACKlick (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. :-) It probably helps that I had no real view on the topic before arriving. My only approach is from the perspective of the (complicated, and "always balance A against B, C, D, and E criteria") article titles policy, and what's best for the readers. To me, it all boils down to whether "vapor", without any context, is potentially misleading, PoV-pushing, or anti-informative. Editors too often go with a "COMMONNAME above all, forever" approach, but it's not what the policy actually wants, for good reason.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  08:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

 Done

Dear SMcCandlish,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Sarah ^(talk) 01:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 339 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

. Buster Seven Talk 15:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Socratic Barnstar

		The Socratic Barnstar
		For extremely skilled and eloquent arguments and advice in guiding the overhaul of the very important article Domestication William Harris • talk • 07:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

[bow] Thanks much. Glad to be helpful!  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  07:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

To fortify you in your marathon task of finding an acceptable form of words to use in our MoS. I admire your patience and stamina and am thinking of proposing you as a Middle East peace envoy... BushelCandle (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Opa!  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  00:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thank you so much for stepping in on the Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations article, specifically the talk page. You seem to be able to clearly communicate the applicability of guidelines and resolve what might otherwise become a dispute. Excellent job! CaroleHenson (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

An additional comment: I have not been looking at the article history, just checking the article every now and then that nothing went amok. And, things seem to be going grrreeeaaaattt! Thanks again.--CaroleHenson (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I try to defuse disputes (when I'm not starting them, ha ha). It's easiest for people who are uninvolved or neutral on something to see where both sides of an issue are going too far (or might).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  23:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Well, you're doing a great job!--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. :-)  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  05:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Howdy Wkatherine003 (talk) 07:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

@Wkatherine003: Thanks. Was this for anything in particular?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  14:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your service to rodents. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

@Bluerasberry: Sanka you very much. I do love to caffeinate some rats.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  14:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		I award you this barnstar to you SMcCandlish because you have shown to be a person of integrity and honor. Or, more simply, a stand-up guy. Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:05, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

@Antidiskriminator: Thanks. :-) Is this in response to any particular edit, page, post, discussion?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  01:41, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your comments at ANI during discussion about Dicklyon's ban got my attention. I looked trough your other contributions and concluded that you deserve this barnstar. I was impressed with your honest approach to eventual disputes although I don't agree with your position every time. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@7&6=thirteen: Thanks! Was this in relation to anything in particular?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  07:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

It was, but I don't remember specifically. Our paths crossed once again. It's a gigantic encyclopedia. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

[In retrospect, it's obvious it was about the thread immediately above it in original talk page.]

Barnstar

For later memory-jogging: this was about this thread at WT:MOS.

Didn't want to mess with your user page, so:

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For going above and beyond to help with a query — Anakimitalk   20:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@Anakimi: Oh, thanks. It was my pleasure (literally – I get a thrill out of resolving long-term, vexing problems with small bits of code). I hope it solves similar layout issues for other editors in other topics, too. I may add a div wrapper for content, as well.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  23:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks you for the Project namespace and TL/SUPPLEMENTAL updates.....been trying to get that wording right for a long time. Would love your CE skills at WP:ESSAYPAGES guideline section and the infopage Wikipedia:Essays. I try to keep them upto date with community norms, but get very little feedback. Moxy (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh, thanks. I'll go look at those. I'm not being very comprehensive about this. Was just looking at one page and it led me to another and and another, so I've been copy-editing various essays and info pages and so on. About to propose a merge of WP:Common sense is not common and WP:NOCOMMON.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  17:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Opinion Barnstar

I just wanted to say "thank you" for coming in and definitively closing the Request for Comments regarding an anonymous user's fringe theory about the nature of the U.S. dollar. In case you had looked, the article had been hijacked by a rolling series of I.P. users since January of this year. User:Khajidha and I would attempt to bring some sanity to the situation, only to be flooded by lengthy diatribes of little worth. Nobody seemed willing to do anything about the situation, so I started a RfC in the hope that some sane Wikipedians would come to the rescue. I then stepped back so that I wouldn't appear biased. Some brave souls did come, but they were pummeled by the same ad nauseum arguments. Finally, at the first light of the fifth day, the cavalry arrived. Thanks to edits by User:NewEnglandYankee, User:Ronz, User:TenOfAllTrades, and finally, thanks to your definitive opinion in the RfC closure, the article seems to have been wrestled back to reality.

For these reasons I bestow upon thee the esteemed

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Thanks for your definitive non-admin closure of a RfC, thereby asserting a sane consensus and bringing U.S. Dollar back to congruence with reality. BirdValiant (talk) 06:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

LOL, thanks, and in retrospect I should have looked a little bit closer at the history. What I saw was all the weird personal rambling about gold being "illegal" to own in the US (WTF? I guess I'm a big ol' criminal then), and how "theoretically" you could still maybe get gold for a dollar if yadda-yadda-yadda. The entire thing looked exactly like those rants about gun "statistics" that far-left fringies pull out of nowhere, or about being able to avoid federal income tax because "The United States" and "The United States of America" are different entities and doodle-doodle-dee that the far-right fringies pull out of nowhere, and it just had to stop per WP not being Facebook or 4Chan. People will troll all day (from both directions) on stuff like that, just because it's fun to argue. I did notice the "slow editwar" stuff going on to push the WP:FRINGE idea that the US dollar isn't a fiat currency, I just didn't pay attention to who in particular had opened the RfC, thus didn't deduce the intent of it. So, sorry if I "shot" you by accident. Of course, it being a WP:NAC, someone who wants to keep blathering about their pet economics hypotheses could reopen it, but we can hope not.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  06:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Fauna titles seastar

		The Fauna Barnstar
		Thanks for the big progress recently on sorting out fauna titles – and other titles, too. Keep it up. Dicklyon (talk) 00:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Oh, thank you!  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  01:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Precious

four dimensions player

Thank you for quality articles such as Jasmin Ouschan and William A. Spinks, for service in 12 years, for thoughts about policy, style and consistency, for an initiative for clarification, - Stanton, cat lover in four dimensions, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Grazie! PS: I really didn't do much on the Ouschan article, though the Spinks one is about 95% my work. Some non-trivial articles I created (not from splits/mergers) are Persian onager, Turkmenian Kulan (over a redirect [1]), "Pool Hall Blues", Valley-Dynamo, Valley National 8-Ball League Association, IBSF World Snooker Championship, Five-pin billiards (a progressive WP:TNT, over what was originally a useless machine translation of the it.wikipedia stub: [2][3][4][5][6]), Crystalate Manufacturing Company, and a TNT rewrite [7] of Three-ball. Something in the system just partial-credited me with the Ouschan GA, probably based on number of edits or something, but it was mostly cleanup work.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  00:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for your recent edits to WP:RFAADVICE. When I wrote that page a few years ago, I never dreamed of the tens of thousands of hits it would get and become the default advice for RFA candidates. It's nice to know that someone is watching over it and making useful improvements. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:14, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

{burp} Thankee verr mush!  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  10:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	I appreciate your contributions regarding my topic ban as well as your thoughts on Arbitration Enforcement. --MONGO 13:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I do what I can to push for some WP:AE and WP:AC/DS reform, but it's very, very slow-going.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  13:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you ...

Call of the Wild

Precious six years

... for improving article quality in January 2018! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I do my best!  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

[This one seems to be recurrent; the also precious Gerda drops one off every month. :-) As long as I'm active, anyway.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)]

A 2nd User Page Barnstar for you

		The Userpage Barnstar
		I decided you deserved this for your very interesting and informative User Page (perhaps all the more so because I only came here because we had been on opposite sides in your ENGVAR Templates RFC). Then I discovered that you already have one of these, so I decided to give you the alternative format. Regards. Tlhslobus (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

@Tlhslobus: Thanks. :-) I consider it kind of a mess; some other editors have done a lot of fancy CSS work to make theirs better, but I don't like to spend a lot of time on userpage stuff unless it's directly geared at productivity. So, it's kind of a feature dump of tools I use, and to-dos, and proposals and their results, plus a bunch of infoboxes that I hope help explain my proclivities, skill sets, interests, and hot buttons to other editors.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  15:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, if it really is a mess, then it would seem to be a very useful and informative mess Tlhslobus (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Glad it's been helpful. :-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name

You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified! You personify an administrator without tools, and have gained my support; already!

I am certain that if you succeeded an RfA, you'd be an excellent administrator. It's possible that the quorum attending your RfA will fail to recognize your gifts, but I think it's worth the endeavor and hope you will give it a go. I understand if you decide against a run, but hope that you'll read the linked essay, and know that it does speak of you.--John Cline (talk) 13:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your ongoing and unending effort to tidy up the bureaucracies around the English Wikipedia. Jc86035 (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps it's time...

Hi SMcMcandlish. As someone who as bumped into you in various spaces over the years with a generally positive impression resulting, I decided to take a closer look at the scope and caliber of your contributions over the last few days because it has occurred to me that your experience and facility with nuanced policy might make you a good candidate for adminship, especially now that we are seriously hurting for skilled mops. I see from looking into the matter that you had a failed run about eight years back, but it seems as if a majority of the opposes came from concerns about the way in which the discussion was promoted rather than fundamental issues with your qualifications. In any event, you have eight extra years of experience and a truly massive amount of edits to your name in the interim. I wonder if I might encourage you take another run? I can well imagine why you were not in a hurry to go through that again, but I suspect you would be good with the bit. Thoughts? Snow ^{let's rap} 07:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

A Baker Barnstar

		The Disambiguator's Barnstar
		The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. For applying your expertise in disambiguating the James Addison Baker articles. Oldsanfelipe (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

@Oldsanfelipe: Thank you!  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:50, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

The Industrial Barnstar

	The Upward Spiral
	For your excellent expansion work of the Girls Under Glass article following its AfD nom. Nice work! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I"m still sore from that one. Took hours and hours. There's still stuff that can be extracted from the interview, and I just found another source. Now someone needs to create a Deathline International page. It's been prodded or speedied twice and this will not do. I can't take that one on (CoI – I know people in the band).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

PS: Regretfully, I had to replace the non-free image with the stock Industrial Barnstar one; we're not allowed to use a non-free image for stuff like this, only to illustrate the article to which it pertains, so some drive-by admin might have just reverted the whole post.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for William Hoskins (inventor)

On 12 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Hoskins (inventor), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Hoskins, the co-inventor of modern billiard chalk, also invented the electric heating coil, used to create the first electric toasters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Hoskins (inventor). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Hoskins (inventor)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Ground billiards

On 26 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ground billiards, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that modern cue sports games such as snooker and nine-ball can be traced back to the game of ground billiards, played with hoops and mallets (illustration shown)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ground billiards. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ground billiards), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Star

		The Editor's Barnstar
		I learned a lot from you about Wikipedia in the Jean Mill afd. Just wanted to say thanks! User:Lightburst 23:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Lightburst: Glad it was a useful wringer. >;-) Thank you for making a good case and doing the leg-work. I think her article is pretty tight, despite my initial skepticism of a bio article on her.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  05:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear SMcCandlish/Barnstars,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: Thanks. I am now officially a WikiFossil. Heh.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: having a kick-ass profile. :D Ivario (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Schweet. Pan-seared, fresh-caught trout, with hashed-browns and an egg on the side is the best breakfast ever.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Bon appetit! Ivario (talk) 16:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for keeping the Nithyananda page clean! I intended to fix all the poor grammar, but you beat me to it. It must've been quite a ride for you, to see the man's antics unfold over the past three years. Happy editing! Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 09:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI: Thanks! It has indeed been strange. I know someone who became a follower of this guru), though this did not color my approach to the content. I've tried hard (before giving it a rest and letting others do it for a year or so) to keep it pruned of both ranty and insufficiently sourced attacks by detractors, and wild promotional/miraculous claims by adherents. Given the state of the media in India, it's difficult to ferret out exactly what is going on legally. The fact that he's been accused of various things doesn't make him guilty, but fleeing the country as more charges pile up doesn't look good either. I'm a bit reminded of John McAfee (and I'm not sure our article on him even covers all the stuff he's allegedly gotten up to).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Valentines! A kitten for you!

You get the Loyalty Award! Please accept this cute little kitten as token of appreciation for being loyal to values, and standing by other editors in need like me! Thank you!

Huggums537 (talk) 22:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For noting that unencyclopedic detail was inserted into the Brunswick Corporation and taking prompt action, exemplifying scrutiny, precision and community service! gidonb (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Also an opportunity to still thank for your support for the NEC Nijmegen rename! gidonb (talk) 10:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Didn't even remember that one. I comment in lots and lots and lots of RM discussions. :-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, we usually look forward and there is always so much to do on WP. After identifying someone as a good candidate for a barnstar, it can be fun to see how you collaborated. For example. gidonb (talk) 10:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Ah yes! I did come closer to ArbCom election, twice, than any other non-admin candidate. I still think we need at least one non-admin in ArbCom, every tranche, since when it is all admins all the time, it's a "who's watching the watchmen?" problem. But I'm unlikely to run again. Me being one of main shepherds of MoS (and thus a blockader of constant attempts to change it willy-nilly to suit people's personal writing-preference pecadillos) means there will always be a large contingent of editors angry with me, so I'm ultimately just never going to be a suitable candidate. Someone else who does entirely non-controverial work around here should run. Besides, I really don't have time for it now. In that era, I did.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, at least you tried!!! In my 20+ years as a Wikipedian I have never submitted myself to anything, or any article I wrote, though there were times I ran into cool historical stuff during my research. Just one example. I did try all kinds of change, for example renaming the Belgian province of Luxembourg, you joined me, and we went down in flames. Since then the standards have been changed, making such a move virtually impossible. Over the years at WP, through trial and error, I have learned to put the stuff that does come your way without asking (I was always happy it did) more front and center so people write to you, at least on average, more focused on content and at a more pleasant tone. gidonb (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

A pleasant tone is rare in style matters, for reasons. Because every single editor detests at least one line item in MoS, and I get in the way of them forcing a change to suit their preferences (which would just turn into years of slow revert-warring with others who have different preferences), some subset of editors are perpetually pissed off at me. It's just how it goes.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I sure see that you deal with a lot of unpleasantness on your talk page. Take a look how my talk page starts every year and see if this will work for you. I really hated all this negativety poured over me and it has become much less since I use this system. Just a friendly tip of something that works for me, for someone who deserves better! Thanks again for all that you do and until the next collaboration! gidonb (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Which diff am I looking for?  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

It's not a diff. Look at your LI and give me a call sometime ;-) Take care! gidonb (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Ah, I see: big pile of barnstars. :-) LI? LinkedIn? I don't go there very often, but will stop in.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

"Dutch sense": yes, I'm Dutch. Compliments for the effort! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

But what syrup should I use? :-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)