User talk:Pectore/A2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Pectore. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Dharmakirti
The shloka has been given as an example of the influence of atheist Hindu schools on Buddhism, also Hindus co-opted Buddha by making him an avatar, you are perhaps not aware of the supreme importance of caste in a Hindu's identity, (though it is changing now) one can never be just a Hindu there has always to be a caste, it is not just the 4 from 4 varnas there are hundreds of castes. Yogesh
Read instructions in {{Lifetime}}
Hi. I would like to suggest you read instructions a bit more carefully. You should not change well established categories with lifetime as you did here. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 20:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Did You Know problem
Hello! Your submission of Caroline Anthonypillai at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 23:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Failed verification at Bhagavad Gita
Please see the quotes and analysis I have added on the article talk page and add your comments, if you wish. There is always a chance that I missed out on the quotes that you were referring to (especially since two of the books I quoted have different publication years than the ones you gave) - if so, just add them to the talk page and we can discuss the issue further. Else, just be more careful that you don't end up misrepresenting sources when making edits in the future. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Caroline Anthonypillai
{{User0|Candlewicke 11:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Sanskrit as a mother tongue
Hi Pectore. There are a few groups in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh who've been trying to revive the everyday use of Sanskrit. I'm not aware of a similar movement amongst Iyers, but I'm happy to be corrected if you can find sources to that effect. -- Arvind (talk) 11:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Please help
Can you tell me what தலை டா நீ means?Please?SchnitzelMannGreek. 18:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think the english pronounciation is "thala da ne". Does that mean anything?SchnitzelMannGreek. 00:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Regarding Media Biasness about modi
Hi Pictore, As you suggested please let me know how I can send you my observations regarding biasness. Do you think I should put those in your or NM talk page? Please suggest. Sparkume (talk) 13:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Religion
Hi, how do you know Abdul Wahid Khan and Tina Sugandh's religion. Hekerui (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk.Pectoretalk 18:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see that cited anywhere.
- Oh, I just saw you submitted that DYK. Why not copy paste? Who needs these old revisions anyway? Regards Hekerui (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Abraham Barak Salem
WP:DYK 02:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Cuba-Sri Lanka relations
WP:DYK 20:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Ayyavazhi=hoax?
Really? Please elaborate. — goethean ॐ 23:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I came to your talk page to discuss this edit too. Ayyavazhi isn't a hoax, it exists and it genuinely still has a following in southern TN, particularly in non-urban Tirunelveli and Kanniyakumari. You'll see, for example, that it still crops up in reports in The Hindu. I don't disagree with its removal - because it is so regional, it's probably not sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in the template - but it's not a hoax. --Arvind (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Saw that you removed a closed AfD. A bot - wubbot - actually comes by a few times a day and removes the page and adds it to the archive of India related deletions. I'll revert your deletion for now, so that the bot'll add it to the archives when removing it. cheers. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 15:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Perinpanayagam Sivaparan
Hello! Your submission of Perinpanayagam Sivaparan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 05:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Indu Mitha
Wikiproject: Did you know? 16:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Mobile section for Gita
Hello,
I added a mobile section to introduce new links for Bhagavad Gita applications that are available in mobile phones. A few of us have worked with other websites and customized the verses and audio contents for mobile phones as a free service.
I am new to wikipedia and went ahead and updated the section. Maybe it is not the correct thing to do. Is there anything I must do to introduce this section back to the wiki page ?
Hare Krishna.
DYK for Perinpanayagam Sivaparan
Wikiproject: Did you know? 17:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Consensus on Conversion Section of Hinduism
Pectore,
Please note that two editors (User:Shreevatsa and User:Kanchanamala) have opposed your edits to the conversion section on Hinduism talk pages. This does not constitute consensus. I would encourage you to: 1) read through WP:CONS to get familiar with what consensus is on Wikipedia, 2) continue discussion on Hinduism talk pages using reliable sources on whether your edits to conversion section are legitimate, and 3) revert your changes for now from the conversion section of Hinduism article in order to avoid edit warring. Thanks for your contributions to the Hinduism article and I look forward to discussing the changes to conversion section further with you. You may wish to start by responding to the questions that I and others have raised. Finally, I can not stress this enough: on wikipedia we rely on what reliable sources say rather than our personal opinions and viewpoints while making changes.
Best Regards Desione (talk) 04:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism on Hinduism article
Please note that your blind reverts on wikipedia Hinduism is against consensus and not based on reliable sources. Continuing to do so constitutes Edit Warring and Vandalism. Desione (talk) 04:17, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Considering myself and shreevatsa are the only two people that have actually improved the page in that regard I find your note laughable and inane. Continue to impress me though with your great knowledge of policy and your strict adherence to the doctrines you so mindlessly spout.Pectoretalk 16:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is not a blog of personal opinion or popularity contest, you need to bring up reliable sources to support your changes (which you have not done). Bring up reliable sources and we will discuss, otherwise please desist from your disruptive edits. Desione (talk) 05:06, 27 September 2009 (UTC)