Welcome!

edit

Hello, MountainTraveler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:04, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scopolamine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buccal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Photos

edit

Hello. Please go to the New England talk page to discuss your interest in changing the photos in the article's infobox. I will be happy to discuss it there with you. Please do not continue to revert other editors' changes. Thank you. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychedelic drug, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spiritual and DMT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ethnicity

edit

Don't confuse ethnicity and race. There are white hispanics and black hispanics. They are of different races, but a common ethnicity. "An ethnic group or ethnicity is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups such as a common set of traditions, ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, or social treatment within their residing area. Ethnicity is sometimes used interchangeably with the term nation, particularly in cases of ethnic nationalism, and is separate from, but related to the concept of races." Niteshift36 (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lol you’re joking right…

There are white Hispanics because of mixed races. wow what the fuck is it

Mexican is an ethnicity or nationality end of story. MountainTraveler (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Your answer doesn't even make sense. I'm quoting reliable sources and you're just making declarations. I'm hear trying to discuss the actual topic and you're edit-warring and cursing at me for no reason. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gulf Cartel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jesús Ochoa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinaloa Cartel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Reina del Sur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinaloa Cartel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antioquia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 20:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MountainTraveler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I stopped what I was being asked to stop. I stopped harassing after the warnings

Decline reason:

We do not have telepathic powers to be able to read your mind and know that you intended to stop. Your vulgar edit summaries are wholly inappropriate for any public forum and you will need to commit to refrain from such attacks in the future. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MountainTraveler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not saying anyone's a mindreader but I was asked by Arjayay to stop and I literally did. Maybe the timing got construed by I stopped and wouldn't do it again in the future.

Decline reason:

You were asked to stop by Arjayay here. You subsequently made this edit and then this one. Best we leave you blocked, because nothing here convinces me you won't just keep acting like this, given that you did keep acting like this earlier today after being asked to stop. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MountainTraveler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No I wrote that stuff before I saw their second warning. I wouldn't do that after the second one and I don't know you think I would continue even after being unblocked? Because of my wording? When I say I'll stop something that means I'll stop. I mean, I understand a temporary block but indefinite seems very excessive for this and I 100% did stop after reading the last warning. Why would you not give someone the benefit of the doubt when we're talking about a permanent blocking of a decent contributor?

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}}

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MountainTraveler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My blocking: "Personal attacks or harassment and misuse of edit summaries, can be unblocked when editor agrees to stop." I agreed to stop and did, it's that simple. Now please unblock so I can finish the page I was working on. Heck you can even block me after I am finished with the page but there's still various things I need to add at least to this one last page before my account goes silent which I was already planning on doing anyways in the next week so it's a win win for everyone.

Decline reason:

I've been looking through your contributions. You made a minor error ("of of"), which anyone could have made, but when someone corrected it, you restored the error with an extremely abusive edit summary, not once but twice. Therefore I do not feel you have the right termperament to work on a collaborative project such as Wikipedia. Request denied. Voice of Clam 09:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Um, I stopped harassing and you still blocked me??

edit

I clearly stopped with the personal attacks and yet I was still blocked? This is punitive, not constructive.

That’s not convincing. Any appeal needs to convince another Administrator these attacks won’t happen again. I notice that you rarely use edit summaries and when you do they tend to be comments on other editors. Doug Weller talk 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. UTRS appeal #54877 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this weren't you, let me know, please do. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply