User talk:Jnestorius/2010

2010

All Pages:

... (up to 100)

Element Tables

I've responded to your comment. I've added Wikipedia:When_to_use_tables#Content_forking.

The proposed merger for the list of element articles has been extant for some time. When will it be completed?174.3.106.27 (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

• I haven't followed up on that. I personally won't be doing it for at least a few weeks. jnestorius^(talk) 01:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Poll on the issue of Irish RU flag

You are receiving this message as you previous participated in a Irish rugby flag related discussion (WP:RUIRLFLAG). There is an ongoing discussion which may interest you here and a poll which may provide a definite answer on the matter :Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#Poll:_Should_Irish_RU_teams_have_an_icon.3F Gpeilon (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi.

Just wanted to say well done on your paragraph *Nouns used attributively* in English plural.

You cite some good examples.

Marquetry28 (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space

Hey there Jnestorius, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Jnestorius/Okay. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Call for consensus/conclusion to current Ireland rugby union team icon

Hello, I am contacting you because you have been an active participant in the recent discussion on icon to be used for Ireland rugby union. I have tried to summarise the many strands and come to a conclusion based on what I perceive the consensus to be in this section - Summary of Ireland Flag discussion and suggested consensus conclusion. To move the issue to a conclusion I am asking all participants who have signed the discussion to read my summary and comment on the validity of the approach I have advocated, before the issue goes cold. I am keen that the enormous efforts of all contributors results in a tangible conclusion on this occasion.Kwib (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Wilfred J Funk

Thanks for your excellent expansion of the Wilfred J. Funk page.

Xophist (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of works with different titles in the United Kingdom and United States

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of works with different titles in the United Kingdom and United States. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of works with different titles in the United Kingdom and United States. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Facebook Error Dialog.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Facebook Error Dialog.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jnestorius. You have new messages at Talk:Definitive postage stamps of Ireland.
Message added 05:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry for the delay! ww2censor (talk) 05:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Efforts appreciated

Nice work on Barony (Ireland) and associated articles. RashersTierney (talk) 19:59, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Belated thanks, jnestorius^(talk) 19:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Baronies (Ireland)

Taken to Talk:Barony (Ireland)#Bias. Rename the section if you like. jnestorius^(talk) 17:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Association football lists by country

Category:Association football lists by country, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 04:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Hi Jnestorius, after seeing one of your articles at newpage patrol, I was surprised to see that an editor who has contributed quite so many articles over such a longtime as you hadn't already been approved as an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. ϢereSpielChequers 16:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Gee, didn't know there was such a thing. Thanks, jnestorius^(talk) 19:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. It's fairly new, and I've started looking out for longstanding contributors like yourself because I noticed that quite a few had been overlooked. ϢereSpielChequers 13:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Craic

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Craic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craic. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Muckanaghederdauhaulia

Good job on the "list of rival longest placenames". Believe it or not, I had planned to make something similar whenever I had more free-time. However, I suggest we move the table to Place names in Ireland and create a new section for it there. We can then add a link to it on the Muckanaghederdauhaulia article. ~Asarlaí 20:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Recent pagemove

Hi, I was wondering - why do you think Clogher, County Tyrone should not be the primary topic for Clogher per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? I don't see anything that really rivals it's claim to the title. Thanks, --JaGa^talk 12:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Baronies: your ojections

I have no strong feelings on the points raised. Feel free to reverse any that offend you. While more specific is better, over specificity can be a nuisance. Cork and Tipperary may have crossed that line.Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

OK. jnestorius^(talk) 06:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Problems

I see that when you edited the U2 Tower article, you added a section called Problems. I just want to thank you for not calling it Issues. --O'Dea (talk) 11:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Hung Parliment

Actually the term is used in most Westminster based systems, including Australia(2010!) and also Canada. --Colliric (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Nether and Upper Tyrone

I recently found a source that declare Nether and Upper Tyrone as counties, however asides from that would you be able to provide me a full direct quote from; Katharine Simms; Chp.6 of Derry and Londonderry : history & society; [ISBN 0906602858], that deals with Upper and Nether Tyrones location either side of the mountain. I would like it for use in several related articles. Thanks in advance. Mabuska ^(talk) 11:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

All Ireland editing

Moved to User talk:Laurel Lodged#Stop jnestorius^(talk) 16:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Records of Members of the Oireachtas

Great work on creating the overdue list of longest serving Senators --Rye1967 (talk) 12:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Not guilty, I'm afraid. User:Snappy is the one you need to congratulate. jnestorius^(talk) 16:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

group of death

Moved to Talk:Group of death#Introduction. jnestorius^(talk) 20:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)