edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Sekunjalo Investments. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and noted! I appreciate your feedback. JayFacts (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surve and Others v Nedbank Ltd and Others (May 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MaxnaCarta were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MaxnaCarta (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, JayFacts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MaxnaCarta (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 14:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Surve and Others v Nedbank Ltd and Others

edit

  Hello, JayFacts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Surve and Others v Nedbank Ltd and Others, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Hello, JayFacts, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Joker1Joker (talk · contribs) or Gevaarlik (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @ToBeFree
Thank you for contacting me for clarification. The above mentioned accounts are not mine and in no way linked to me. In fact, they keep undoing my changes. Please can you review these users. JayFacts (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks JayFacts, I've had a look and will probably continue to have an eye on the situation. The dispute resolution policy provides additional advice about how to deal with such situations, and how we can seek independent opinons. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply