Article deletion

edit

Earlier this year you may recall me challenging you about my feeling that you are nominating significant numbers of articles for deletion and I see in recent weeks you have again been wanting significant numbers of article removed from Wikipedia, both from you nominating articles and from seeing you advocating for delete within other AfD discussions. This view is underlined when I look at your user stats which state that by far the highest proportion of your posts have been in deletion discussions.

You will recall me suggesting that you use your time here to improve articles rather than just advocating for articles to be deleted, and I got the feeling that you took on board my suggestion and the number of articles you wanted to be deleted fell, and I noted that you did start to be more constructive and you will recall my complimentary remarks regarding your efforts with keeping UK radio templates up to date so I am saddened that you have started to revert back to wanting articles deleted.

I did feel that last time you were constructive in your replies and I ask you to, again, see that this is not me having a go, and instead see this as me respectfully asking you to be more positive in your contributions going forward. Rillington (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Flip Format. Thank you for your work on Skylark (radio station). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Beat 103 logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Beat 103 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Aircheckdownloads.com

edit

What is your view regarding aircheckdownoads.com not being seen as a suitable reference on Wikipedia? If this site had been allowed it might have helped save some of the presenter articles that have been deleted over the past year or two, and going forward if this site was to be allowed it would enhance other articles which might otherwise struggle to survive an AfD. Rillington (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply