Delabrede - I believe that you worked on the page for Bumpei Usui. I tried to edit but am not good at editing. The Personal Life section now needs fixing but hopefully you can see what I added. Can you help fix it? Virgnia Howard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vhoward36 (talkcontribs) 00:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ms. Howard, Thanks for the added information. Yes, I will review and correct as necessary. -- Delabrede (talk) 10:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply



Master Apartments

edit

Good job on that article! I've nominated it for Did You Know status at this page, so this article may be displayed on the Main Page. Keep up the good work! Epic Genius (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Epicgenius!Delabrede (talk)


Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Werner Drewes, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Werner Drewes, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

— Thanks for these two tips, Piotrus! — Delabrede (talk)


DYK for Master Apartments

edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Daniel Brustlein

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Daniel Brustlein at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias talk 08:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Daniel Brustlein

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Precious

edit

Woodside history and abstract art
Thank you for quality articles, written with love for details, beginning with the history of Woodside, Queens, showing us the many facets of Daniel Brustlein, pictured, working on artists of the first exhibition held by American Abstract Artists, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much Gerda! I'm grateful for all the thoughtful guidance I've received from you and other Wikipedia editors. -- Delabrede (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
My pleasure ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1227 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom

edit

...for help with the DYK submission and article links for Louise Upton Brumback!

Delabrede (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Louise Upton Brumback

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Louise Upton Brumback at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Louise Upton Brumback

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Edward Hart (settler)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Edward Hart (settler) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete DYK nomination

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Eugenie McEvoy at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Edward Hart (settler)

edit

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Eugenie McEvoy

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Leo Dee

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lily Furedi

edit

Allen3 talk 00:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


Random squawking at Dates / details. Shenme (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lena Gurr

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Adelaide Lawson

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Adelaide Lawson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jolly Ω Janner 19:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Adelaide Lawson

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Katherine Schmidt

edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hello there!

edit

We got a big kick just now at Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/ArtAndFeminism 2016/Emory University over your work to Mary E. Hutchinson. Thank you! Someone tried to publish a much shorter version and it was deleted. Thank you for your work! Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 18:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Biosthmors: Thanks, Biosthmors, As you probably noticed I'm still doing some article cleanup. -- Delabrede (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Gerri Major

edit

On 21 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gerri Major, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gerri Major was the first African American woman to announce programs on commercial radio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gerri Major. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gerri Major), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

WormTT(talk) 09:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Gerri Major

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gerri Major you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Gerri Major

edit

The article Gerri Major you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gerri Major for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Gerri Major

edit

The article Gerri Major you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Gerri Major for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


DYK nomination of Heather Booth

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Heather Booth at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking care of the issues I raised on the DYK nomination template. But the lead is still too long, and seems to be jumping back and forth chronologically with highlights from her career. The lead should be a summary of the article, and there is no need to add cites to uncontroversial material that is anyway cited later in the article. Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yoninah -- That makes sense to me. I've now made the lead into a brief summary of the article's main facts. -- Delabrede (talk) 23:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Gemberling Colonial Stairway.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Gemberling Colonial Stairway.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Train2104. My mistake. I have added a statement related to this image to the article. -- Delabrede (talk) 17:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Heather Booth

edit

On 18 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Heather Booth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Wood has called Heather Booth "one of the nation's most influential organizers for progressive causes"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Heather Booth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Heather Booth), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Priscilla Roberts) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Priscilla Roberts.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work! Please note that you should close all templates with }} or else it will be broken.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abelmoschus Esculentus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer..

Abelmoschus Esculentus (talkcontribs) 13:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


@Abelmoschus Esculentus: Thanks! Delabrede (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Lucy L'Engle) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Lucy L'Engle.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

great work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Betty Waldo Parish) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Betty Waldo Parish.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Excellent work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol Status

edit

Delabrede, are you at all interested in applying to be Autopatrolled? It would mean your articles (consistently of very high quality) would no longer go through New Pages Patrol. I would be happy to nominate you, or you can nominate yourself here: [1].--MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, MainlyTwelve, I will be happy to have you nominate me. -- Delabrede (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, didn't see your reply until now. I'll nominate today!--MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Nomination is up!--MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply


A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Well done for such writing such a great article at Lincoln_Arcade Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Arthur Deshaies) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Arthur Deshaies.

User:FULBERT while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Interesting article and nice contribution to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Marie Hansen.

User:Girth Summit while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Wow - nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit (blether) 20:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Seriously, wow! I think that has to be the most fully developed article I've ever come across while doing WP:NPP. I haven't been through it thoroughly, but on a quick skim I'd suggest you think about putting it forward for a GA review. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 20:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations!

edit

Hi there, Delabrede, and congratulations on the very high standard of your biographies of American artists. I have been looking through all the articles you have created and was particularly pleased to see how many women you had covered. The ORES assessment tool rates most of them as GA or FA but without the relevant reviews, B is the highest ranking we can give. If you are interested in bringing any of them to GA or higher, you might like to participate in WikiProject Women in Green. In any case, I look forward to more biographies along the same lines. You are making a really important contributor to Wikipedia. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted

edit
 

Hi Delabrede, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talkwork) 05:17, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
I found you here on Wikipedia via your old blog, http://secondat.blogspot.com/ when researching T.E. Lawrence's "Minorities" (I greatly appreciated your posts about the poetry in that book, on the blog...) Kind Regards, Trish Short Lewis [email protected] Trishymouse (talk) 17:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


Helene Herzbrun

edit

Hello! Just a heads up that I rearranged the above article, mostly as I thought the material in the personal life section duplicated the early life section. I hope you find my edits OK. Also, did you know you can delete or archive most talk page items if you so desire? --- Possibly (talk) 03:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
I keep coming across your excellent, finely crafted articles! --- Possibly (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sherwood Studio Building - potential DYK

edit

Great work on this article! I think it's a pretty impressive subject that unfortunately has been destroyed. Would you mind at all if I nominated this for DYK? Epicgenius (talk) 18:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Epicgenius (talk). I am happy you wish to nominate Sherwood Studio Building for a DYK. In the past I have made DYK and GA nominations for my stronger articles and in doing so I've learned a lot (although the screen reader problem hasn't been pointed out to me until now). Mostly, although it's clear I still have much to learn, I prefer to spend most of my time researching and writing and not so much of it working to be sure I've got everything exactly right.
-- Delabrede (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Delabrede: No problem. I'll nominate the article shortly, then. I think you deserve credit for your great work.
In regards to the images, it's fine. The reason I said it's not good practice is because it's actually discouraged in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Images due to mobile devices (particularly phones being unable to display images to the left and right, so they will actually display in one column from top to bottom). My fix isn't perfect, but it should resolve the issue for now without creating too many more issues. Epicgenius (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Barnstar of Fine Arts
I just came across your terrific article on the Sherwood Studio Building while perusing DYK noms. Your articles on the arts and artists are wonderful! Netherzone (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Netherzone (talk). You made my day! -- Delabrede (talk) 19:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sherwood Studio Building

edit

On 8 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sherwood Studio Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Sherwood Studio Building was characterized in 1892 as New York City's "uptown headquarters of Art", with many of its tenants having studied art together? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sherwood Studio Building. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sherwood Studio Building), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Women in Green Editathon

edit

Hello Delabrede -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 01:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
For your single-handed creation of Edmund Archer (artist). You should absolutely consider nominating it for GA status. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 19:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Russell Cowles

edit

Hi Delabrede. Just to let you know I've had to revert your edit to Russell Cowles. You appear to have been trying to cleanup the refs, but instead duplicated the whole article inside the reflist. LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmission °co-ords° 17:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Daniel Celentano Supper Hour.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Celentano Supper Hour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article Editathon

edit
 

Hello Delabrede:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Agnes Weinrich

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Agnes Weinrich you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Agnes Weinrich

edit

The article Agnes Weinrich you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Agnes Weinrich for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:AgnesWeinrichOldHousesUndatedDrawing.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:AgnesWeinrichOldHousesUndatedDrawing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Agnes Weinrich

edit

The article Agnes Weinrich you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Agnes Weinrich for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, Delabrede, and thank you for all the excellent biographies you have written on American artists, especially those about women. It looks to me as if several of your recent creations are very close to meeting the GA standard. May I encourage you to submit one or more to this Women in Green event. Perhaps you would also like to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where you work is likely to be an inspiration to less experienced editors.--Ipigott (talk) 10:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ann Brockman

edit

Dear Delabrede, Ann Brockman and her husband Bill McNulty were great friends with my grandparents in 1930-1943. I have a large oil painting she did and gave my grandparents. I also have a couple of McNultys etchings. I believe the townhomes they rented were my grandparents townhome, who also rented a house in Long Island where my great grandmother and great-greatgrandmother styed to take care of mother and her sister.. My grandparents were Jack Kerkhoff, columnist and reporter for a couple of New York papers (one was the old Heast paper) and my grandmother, his wife, was Ellen Hogue, a published writer who co-authored with Beckdolt on a couple of books and she was also a poet, published.

Let me know if you want a jpg of her painting. Growing up in So. Calif..my brother and I always called Old Grump Face. My grandfather loved the painting but Ann didn’t..,she gave it to him. Feel free to contact me. Ann was a sweet lady …her husband Bill, according to my mother, now deceased, was a bit of a “gets too close to women kind of man”…but don’t print that. Sincerely, Lynn Robinson. Jmrobinsonmcc (talk) 04:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Lynn,
Thanks for contacting me. Yes, I would like to see a jpg of the painting. My email is [email protected]. I didn't know about the friendship of the Brockman-McNultys with the Kerkhoff-Hogues. Brockman and McNulty were good friends with Jack Bechdolt and his wife Mabel Claire. Bechdolt was a newsman like Kerkhoff, and Claire was a writer like Hogue so there's an obvious connection. Brockman and McNulty lived at 404 W. 20th St in NYC between 1917 and 1943 and after her death he stayed on until 1945. During that time, the building was owned by members of the Cushman family (who owned a lot of properties in the Chelsea neighborhood -- I wrote an article about 404 W. 20th for Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/404_West_20th_Street ) . Although I couldn't find any indications that Brockman and McNulty lived in a townhouse that Kerkhoff owned, that doesn't mean that they didn't of course.
You probably have searched Kerkhoff thoroughly. This is what I found poking around the internet this morning:
1. Brief Life History of Johnston Davis:When Johnston Davis Kerkhoff was born on 1 November 1900, in Oak Park, Cook, Illinois, United States, his father, Theodore Moss Kerkhoff, was 25 and his mother, Ethel Lilian Johnson, was 24. He married Eleanor Hogue Stinchcomb on 19 May 1920, in Frankfort, Benzie, Michigan, United States. They were the parents of at least 2 daughters. He lived in Brooklyn, New York City, New York, United States for about 5 years. His occupation is listed as columnist, newspaperman, new york herald tribune in New York City, New York, United States. He died on 30 April 1958, in Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, at the age of 57. Source: ttps://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/M6JD-41F/johnston-davis-kerkhoff-1900-1958
2. Eleanor Hogue Stinchcomb  1896 – 8 June 1940, Spouse: Johnston Davis Kerkhoff Source: ttps://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/G964-9YG
3. NYC 1940 phonebook via Steve Morse: Kerkhoff Ltd 21-09 Bordan Av, LIC
4. 1942 WWII draft card via familysearch: addr. 335 W. 14th St. NYC; empl. New York Post
5. 1940 Census via familysearch: Kerkhoff living in Brooklyn
6. Via FindAGrave: Johnston was born in 1900. He passed away in 1958. When Johnston Kerkhoff was born on November 1, 1900, in Illinois, his father, Theodore, was 25 and his mother, Ethel, were 24. He married Eleanor STINCHCOMB, an author herself, who wrote under her grandfathers name-Eleanor Hogue. Jack and Eleanor had two daughters together. Unfortunately, she passed away in 1940. He then met and married Ruth B Burnette on April 26, 1941, in New York City, New York. Jack died on May 2, 1958, in Baja California, Mexico, at the age of 57. Johnston aka Jack Kerkhoff was a newspaperman, having worked at the Detroit Free Press, the Philadelphia Record, the New York Hearld Tribune under Hearst, in addition to writing historical novels on Aaron Burr, Alfred Dreyfus and one on himself . Two of his books, "Traitor, Traitor" and "How Thin The Veil" have been taken and republished. Source: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/239921829/johnston-davis-kerkhoff
~~~ Jeff Delabrede (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time

edit
 

Hello Delabrede:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
 
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" GA Editathon – October 2024

edit
 

Hello Delabrede:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply