Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

LTA

edit

User:OrchidFruit83 - New LTA of the ones you just caught. Synorem (talk) 05:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nice catch :p Synorem (talk) 05:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 
 

  Interface administrator changes

 
  Pppery

  CheckUser changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


User:2600:1009:B1AA:7811:5FE3:5B72:67EC:F292

edit

Hello. That IP user you blocked for edit warring Delaware County, Ohio is back and is reverting my edit again. PiperLeeBob (talk) 21:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Always deleting something on the Greater Central Philippine language & Tausg people topic

edit

Hello, I'm just reminding you about regarding the GCP & Tausug topic in Wikipedia that I've already inputed/cited the sources that there are languages spoken outside the Philippine archipelago and Northern Sulawesi that are part of Greater Central Philippine family but the Tausug & Iranun languages. - Tausug or Suluk a South Bisayan language not only spoken in the Philippines (Sulu Archipelago, Southern Palawan, Zamboanga Peninsula) but also in Sabah (eastern coast), Malaysia, Sandakan, Tawau, Pulau Banggi Kudat, Lahad Datu, Kalabakan. - Iranun or Ilanon a Danao language spoken not only spoken in the Philippines (North & South Lanao, Cotabato, South Zamboanga provinces) but in Sabah, Malaysia (mostly in Kota Belud, some significant communities found in Kota Kinabalu, Papar & Labuan, which was separated from Sabah in order to become a Federal Territory). That's all... And what's wrong with it? In the case of Tausugs in Malaysia & Indonesia (Sandakan, Tawau,Semporna, Kudat, Kalabakan, Lahad Datu, Nunukan) & Iranuns of Malaysia (Kota Belud, Kota Kinabalu)? They don't considered themselves to be called Moros nor Filipinos, The term "Moro" is only exclusive in the Philippines because Spaniards used it as a derogatory term for those Muslim people living in the Southern Philippines, the term originated after the Moors of Andalusia during Spanish Inquisition. And yet, Spaniards never made their journey to Borneo (because of Madrid Protocol of 1885). Do I need it to discuss for you so that you will be understand or enlightened? If you don't, try going to the said places there in Malaysia & Indonesia so that you will know. 49.149.100.11 (talk) 07:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why was it hard for you to understand? 49.149.100.11 (talk) 07:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, I belonged to the said ethnic what your're talking about (Tausug). 49.149.100.11 (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
And that is according to what reliable source? You haven't cited one. —C.Fred (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've already told you already. Before the Joshua Project published it, they got it from this somewhat kind ofnjll journal or something with a title:"Kalimantan Utara Province, scattered coastal settlements; immigrants from Sulu Archipelago in the Philippines" from Ethnolouge 2016 (you need to login). 49.149.100.11 (talk) 13:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
try to visit the other langauge versions (Bahasa Indonesia, Tieng Viet, etc.) of the topic Tausug people, they used that as a source for 21,000. 49.149.100.11 (talk) 13:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Other Wikipedia projects are not, in and of themselves, reliable sources. If you're going to change the info, you must provide the source; you can't just say that it can be found somewhere else. —C.Fred (talk) 16:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply