User talk:Andonic/Archive 9
Have you got any idea how I would take a photo of infinite regression? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 07:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- To quote from the article itself: "Infinite regress in optics is the formation of an infinite series of receding images created in two parallel facing mirrors." Mathmo Talk 09:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- My problem is you can always see the camera's reflection. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I'm sure I've seen an answer to this somewhere. Would a one way mirror work? Or then again there is photoshopping. Oh, or you could use a ray tracing program! You could at least get an image which looks like a photograph even if it is not actually a photograph. Mathmo Talk 11:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Try with two wide mirrors (at a mirror store maybe?); you can crop out the part with the camera, and you'll still see a lot of the mirrors. · AndonicO Talk · Sign Here 12:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Drat, why didn't I mention that? Then again, that is just similar line of thinking to where I was going with photoshopping. But what you said is a simpler option. Mathmo Talk 13:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Try with two wide mirrors (at a mirror store maybe?); you can crop out the part with the camera, and you'll still see a lot of the mirrors. · AndonicO Talk · Sign Here 12:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I'm sure I've seen an answer to this somewhere. Would a one way mirror work? Or then again there is photoshopping. Oh, or you could use a ray tracing program! You could at least get an image which looks like a photograph even if it is not actually a photograph. Mathmo Talk 11:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- My problem is you can always see the camera's reflection. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
!
editThe Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
AndonicO, I award you this barnstar in apprechiation of your tireless contributions to Wikipedia. Keep them up! ... Kamope · talk · contributions 01:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC) |
[[Image:Bearbarnstar.jpg|centre|thumb|...but don't let this bear eat your barnstar. :) : Kamope · talk · contributions 01:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Vista Visual Thingy
editHey AndonicO, I have this program called WindowBlinds that can make my Windows 2000 look like XP, Vista, or even 3.11! Cool huh? RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal 12:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Selected Image
editHey Andonic. Its a shame that it isn't permitted for the portal but ah well. Thanks very much for selecting my picture: I am honoured :D. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 20:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
New messages joke
editI'm afraid you have to remove the new messages joke, as it is a violation of Wikipedia:User page. Someone already removed it from my pages. I'm so sorry! Kamope · talk · contributions 01:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- All of the other jokes are likely to be removed soon. Kamope·?·! Sign! 01:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
HA!
editThat's funny; but sadly the advice wasn't constructive ;). Hey did you see where my RFA vandalized? It was funny; and they supported me! Cheers. ~ Arjun 21:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[1] :) ~ Arjun 21:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- I know; I was kind of POed that someone reverted a support vote. ;) ~ Arjun 21:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes sir :). ~ Arjun 21:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Birthday
editThank you very much for wishing me a happy birthday! and please sign my signature book Qmwnebrvtcyxuz 22:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Screenshots
editWell you really only need one screenshot for the gameplay section, just so you can demonstrate what the game looks like while it is being played to help the reader. Fair use says only one is allowed per article, but this is under discussion, and if one of the other two pics serves some other purpose in the article, I'd say it's okay to put in. My other screenshot was showing what an ingame cut screen looked like, and gave the reader a look into the story mode (kinda what the arena shot does). One example that comes to mind is if you want to put an image in development or reception regarding the game's graphics, gameplay etc. Personally I like this one the best for the gameplay section, based on it's cropping and demonstration of battle, environment, formation use, and civilization uniqueness. However, I've never played the game, so the choice is really yours. It's a little big for web resolution, so if you could make that smaller, that would be good too.--Clyde (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I'm still in the process of transferring resources to cite web, but my breaks kinda interfered with that. I'll take care of that as soon as I can.
- Hey man I was sticking some fair use rationales in the images, and I couldn't find the sources for them, so I can't make them web resolution. Do you know anything about this that I might not?--Clyde (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wait did I miss something? I was looking for this or this. I don't think they're on there.--Clyde (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- If you want (I could also), but you might want to keep it in the 500 X 500 range so it's web resolution (whatever that actually means).--Clyde (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Garion96's RFA
editThank you for your support in my request for adminship which closed successfully last night. <insert spam> I would also like to encourage you to vote often (just in case you don't) on other candidates since we need more admins. </insert spam> Btw, that you still rememembered that after so long. :) Happy editing, Garion96 (talk) 00:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I've added some quick tips, most of which you probably know about. This portal definitely has potential. Keep up the great work! Happy editing, S.D. ¿п? § 00:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- First of all, thank you very much. :-) Your first tip says "I would suggest randomizing the contents of the portal.", which, frankly, I don't understand. The second is "The introduction needs an image.", is that fine? Third: "More selected content, did you know's, and a things you can do box are needed." Selected content will be updating once monthly, DYKs have to be on the main page first, so it's hard (or am I wrong on that?), and I'll make a "things to do" section soon. Your fourth is "Try to add an image to every box." do you mean literally? (eg. I can't think of images that would go well in the category box). · AndonicO Talk · Sign Here 01:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Here are some explanations (sorry if my tips were a bit vague :)):
- An example of a portal that randomizes content is the Chemistry portal. Here, the content (articles, pictures, did you know's, etc.) doesn't have to changed. Every time you press "Show new selections," new content shows up.
- Yes, that's great. :D
- Not literally, but images on content like selected articles, pictures, and biographies and things you can do would be good.
- Hope these help! Happy editing, S.D. ¿п? § 02:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Here are some explanations (sorry if my tips were a bit vague :)):
- Also, DYK's don't have to be on the main page in order to be on the portal — an example is the Religion portal's did you know section. Cheers! S.D. ¿п? § 02:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problems, just give me a call when you have 10 of each content. Great job so far! S.D. ¿п? § 12:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[Reset] I've started randomizing things. The template is {{Random portal component}}. The code is simply: {{Random portal component|max=Number of things you have|header=''Selected _________''|subpage=Selected _________}}
. For example, since you have six selected articles for the portal, the code is for randomizing the selected articles is: {{Random portal component|max=6|header=''Selected article''|subpage=Selected article}}
. Be sure to update the max=__#__
, maximum number, every time you make a new subpage. The subpages need to be like this: Portal:Example/Selected thing/# (the tenth picture would be named Portal:Strategy games/Selected picture/10). Hope this helps! Cheers, S.D. ¿п? § 23:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Civilizations at War
editHi; just took a quick glance, and it looks like a lot of progress is being made. I notice spoiler tags in the campaign section; usually, I'm against those, but the section does not label it as a plot section already, so I guess it's fine. The references are coming along, although you might need a bit more variety and perhaps some scholarly sources, if possible. They also need to be formatting. It's a great start though, and it has a lot of promise. — Deckiller 11:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- The Easter Egg section may be able to be axed, or perhaps added into the development section as a last paragraph. Something like "the developers added an easter egg...". — Deckiller 11:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Formatting references means placing it in a manner that does not just provide the external links. For examples, see, say, the Final Fantasy VIII references. Template:Cite web also helps out a lot. I could not find any matches on scholar.google.com, so you'll have to rely on asserting notability through sales and critical response, which is fine. — Deckiller 11:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- It shouldn't be too hard to find sales figures. That will be the key to assessing notability; has the product reached to enough people to warrent significant mention? I'll take a look later if I have time, but I recommend that you take a look at some video game FAs and find what sources they used for sales figures, and try to see if they have the numbers for this game as well. — Deckiller 12:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's a good move. I made some formatting fixes. — Deckiller 12:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll give it a quick skim and see what I can pick out first. — Deckiller 12:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- The major things I think you should fix before going to peer review are using the cite web template for the remainder of the references (right now, it's only for the first 4 refs), perhaps breaking up the gameplay section into 2-3 paragraphs, and perhaps a copy-edit. Although the copy-edit can always wait until you get some more people interested in the peer review. — Deckiller 12:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey; you might want to add a review chart similar to Final Fantasy VIII. That might cut down the reception section a bit. — Deckiller 23:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- The major things I think you should fix before going to peer review are using the cite web template for the remainder of the references (right now, it's only for the first 4 refs), perhaps breaking up the gameplay section into 2-3 paragraphs, and perhaps a copy-edit. Although the copy-edit can always wait until you get some more people interested in the peer review. — Deckiller 12:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll give it a quick skim and see what I can pick out first. — Deckiller 12:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's a good move. I made some formatting fixes. — Deckiller 12:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- It shouldn't be too hard to find sales figures. That will be the key to assessing notability; has the product reached to enough people to warrent significant mention? I'll take a look later if I have time, but I recommend that you take a look at some video game FAs and find what sources they used for sales figures, and try to see if they have the numbers for this game as well. — Deckiller 12:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Formatting references means placing it in a manner that does not just provide the external links. For examples, see, say, the Final Fantasy VIII references. Template:Cite web also helps out a lot. I could not find any matches on scholar.google.com, so you'll have to rely on asserting notability through sales and critical response, which is fine. — Deckiller 11:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks from California Gold Rush
editThanks for helping to protect this Main page FA! NorCalHistory 21:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:! - Thanks!
editThank you for the barnstar! Kamope·?·! Sign! 12:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Kamope has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Mediation case of Muhammad pictures
editHi, How are you. Please guide that case to quick and good solution. Right now it seem like stop at one place. best wishes, --- ALM 17:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Mediation of Talk:Muhammad/Mediation
editHello,
I'm not sure if you're the Mediator for this or not, there seems to be some confusion as to who is, since the original Mediator apparently retired in December. Hopefully I'm asking the right person. Shouldn't there be an RFMF tag on the Discussion Page for the Muhammad article, alerting editors that a Mediation is underway? I, and others, having been recently discussing this topic there to develop a consensus, unaware that a separate Mediation page exists. JGHowes 19:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've added my two cents' worth about informal mediation tags at Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal and also read with interest your comments about the difficulty with resolving Talk:Muhammad/Mediation. I really don't see how anyone, even with the wisdom of Solomon, can resolve to everyone's satisfaction the question of whether Mohammed should be pictorially portrayed in a Wikipedia biographical article about him, given that one side is basing their argument on deeply held religious beliefs while the other side, not sharing those beliefs, feels equally strongly about freedom of expression. But kudos for volunteering to try! Cheers, JGHowes 21:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Is it ready?
editNow that the citations have been formatted, the reception section box put in, and the images fixed, are you going to go for GA with rise and fall? Except for something written about the audio and multiplayer (both have small mention in reception) I think it is ready. What do you think?--Clyde (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey saw you put rise and fall on the CVG PR. The list of specialized RTS editors is pretty small, and I think you might be better if you put rise and fall on the main PR for grammer, copyediting and the like. I guess we should wait it out and see if we get a bite first, though.--Clyde (talk) 01:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Being thorough is a good thing, but if you put it on the regular PR, I'm pretty sure it shows in the CVG thing too...but whatever.--Clyde (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Talk:Muhammad/Mediation
editHi AndonicO, in the suggestion, it is not very clear what voting "yes" means and what voting "no" means. I know for a fact that Proabivouac would have voted "yes", as would have I, but it seems most people are confusing the meaning. Could you clarify this (e.g. add what you are voting for next to the words yes and no)? Thanks, --Hojimachongtalkcon 01:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Help request
editHi, regarding this, what do you need? --Ideogram 02:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I have summed up your suggestion since it seems to have caused confusion among some. Please tell me / remove it if you believe I am misrepresenting it. (I didn't include 150px since, I thought it was an aside rather than part of the suggestion, however, I don't think size (as long as reasonable) was ever much of an issue). Thank you, gren グレン 07:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Because of your page I learned what company scrip is. Thank you. gren グレン 07:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but the way this straw poll has been handled is completely unacceptable. I am not alone in refusing to sign either option. One editor has already changed his vote twice due to the confusing and contradictory clarifications of what this poll means. The option of a straightforward application of Wikipedia policy wasn't even offered.Proabivouac 11:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Uh-Oh!
editMy Windows 2000 isn't working on the computer that I own, so don't worry If I'm late to respond to things. I'll tell you how things work out. I'm just glad I still own my other OLD win 2000 computer so I can plug that in as a last resort. Wish me luck with that. I may have to say bye bye to a great computer! Wahh!! RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal 14:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
WHT
editDid you see the 10000 point question? (Do you like the bonus questions?) I've removed it but I think I technically shouldn't be 6th (as of now). Any comments? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- When I'm on for no more than 20 minutes, I don't change my status...already got too many user edits. ;) --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, I've already changed it to 10 points if you haven't noticed. [I think you have ;) ] --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Farewell, My Good Friend
editAndonicO, I have decided that I can't continue on wikipedia. I am going to leave for good. I hope this doesn't make a big impact, but I have to do it. I hope you can help make a difference here, and good luck. Farewell -- RyGuy(Retired)
You voiced your opinion in the original straw poll which has caused some confusion. Please do the same in a new version, Talk:Muhammad/Mediation#Suggestion_.28untainted.29, which should be clear and allow us to better assess consensus. gren グレン 22:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Mediation is without any mediator. It will never end this way. I am sorry but not happy. :( --- ALM 14:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am afraid unless you are very strict about people staying on topic, and within policy, then this will continue to degrade. We are at the point where good users are becoming disruptive over this. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 14:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fir! I noticed you corrected a few grammer mistakes on Rise and Fall; thanks! The only thing I wanted to ask you was that you changed the period at the end of the sentence from the inside of a quote, to the outside. Is this correct grammer? I thought the periods went inside of the quotation. Thanks! · AndonicO Talk 01:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi AO!
- Thanks for your note. Although I fixed the apostrophes, the quotation marks were moved automatically by AutoWikiBrowser. As far as I know, either way is correct, but the developers of AWB must have it set to "correct" articles to move quotation marks to before the period. I don't know why; there may be something about this mentioned on WT:AWB or on WP:MOS. Sorry this note wasn't particularly helpful. Firsfron of Ronchester 02:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey!
editHello AndonicO. Long time no see. I was just wondering, how are stuff going for you on Wikipedia these days? Also, I noticed you removed the link to your sig. book from your signature. Was it making it too long? Tennis DyNamiTe (sign here) 02:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm doing all right. Unfortunately I've had very little time to edit Wikipedia, but I hope to have more time in the coming weeks. Tennis DyNamiTe (sign here) 04:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
You're Lucky
editHey AndonicO, you're lucky, because I'm Back!!! I decided that I can just change the times I go on. :-) RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal 12:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
The question
editHave you seen my userpage? Kamope·?·! Sign! 13:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I put a link at the bottom. My page with those stuff is at User:Kamope/Userpage. Kamope·?·! Sign! 13:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- It must be your browser because on mine it's fine. Kamope·?·! Sign! 21:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Also my talk has been vandalized alot too. If you like you can look at the history. >Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 02:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, it was only vandalism :) That user also did that to my userpage. >Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 02:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Also, a simalar edit was made to my userpage by a vandal a while ago [2]. The anon also did the same thing to User talk:Luna Santin >Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 02:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Poll on every little issue
editPlease sign if any of these things applies to your understanding of this issue. Please put you name under all of the options you think would be acceptable. You can sign all or none of these, I'm hoping this will give us a more-fine grained understanding of the issue. [3] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Futurebird (talk • contribs) 21:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC).
AoE3
editSame for you, good work!
You guessed right; I play on ESO, also as TomasBat. --TomasBat (@)(Sign) 20:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I´ll do the same. --TomasBat (@)(Sign) 21:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
editIt's been a week since my recent request for adminship passed, and since I haven't managed to delete the Main Page or indef-block Jimbo - yet - I figure it's safe to send these out. Thanks a lot for participating in my RfA; I hope to do a good job. If you see me doing something wrong, need help, or just want to have a chat, please don't hesitate to drop by :) – riana_dzasta 07:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
98, for now
editMy computer is now(temporarally) running on windows 98 with no sound drivers or anything. I will have to use it for now, but I hope to eventually get XP. -- Ryan I'm Back! 13:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Agassiz statue
editThe uploader of the image that was replaced in Louis Agassiz by the one I found has reverted it back, claiming the other one "looks better". I think his one has a copyright problem though - it obviously comes from here where it states "These images may not be reproduced or used for any purpose without permission." What do you think I should do? Readro 00:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not to worry, the image has now been placed in 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Readro 01:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
re: R and F update
editWell it's had to 2 PRs, it's a GA, and suggestions were made during it's GAC. Are we going to push for FAC? And if so, when?--Clyde (talk) 21:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well I suppose it might be possible to write based on reviews and guides and the like, but having zero experience with this particular game, I'm not much help. Well I'll keep a tab on R and F's progress until FAC.--Clyde (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Picture of the Year contest
editHello. Thank you for your interest in the 2006 Picture of the Year contest. To vote, you must be an established Wiki editor with at least 100 edits registered either on your Commons or on your home wiki account (eg on one of the Wikimedia sites). You don't have 100 edits on your Commons account, but if you do on your home wiki, please add a diff pointing to a statement on your home wiki talk page which confirms your identity. See for a step by step guide here. Thank you! If you have any questions, you can ask at Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2006. Bryan 18:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
what
editwhat are you talking about?--Empire Earth 18:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh i took the title off the game then uploaded it to a website which turned it into that for me. the next best thing after actually having the image there--Empire Earth 19:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
The Prophet Muhammad image dispute
editI have put a template here as to how we should resolve the dispute. Please leave a comment regarding this on my talk page. If you like this template please don't put it up yourself. I am looking for some sort of concensus. If you don't like the template please leave a suggestion for improving it.Bless sins 03:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For your effort
edit[[Image:Award of Anittas.JPG|right|thumbnail|110px|For your great effort and good contribution on Rise and Fall: Civilizations at War -- Awarded by Anittas, February 2007 ]]
- I second that award; great job :). ~ Arjun 23:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, and congrats. I didn't contribute enough to the article for me to list it, though. — Deckiller 20:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks; I'm glad I was able to help. FA the next target? — Deckiller 01:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Automated PR
editI use Windows too, though it seems that most problems tend to be browser based (I use IE, though Safari/Firefox users a couple of times have reported that nothing happens). If the link appeared and nothing happened after it was clicked, it might have been a CSS thing, which I’m horrible at, but which is fixable, or another error of some sort; if the link never appears then the problem will probably be more complex.
In the meantime, this, while not as convenient, may work as a substitute. AZ t 00:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Me
editYeah, I've had a lot of "personal" stuff going on. I'll find time, don't worry.
But I'm still active here, and here.
And the you-know-what is off. We canceled it. -- ~D-Lord (Sign!) (TCE) 00:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
You helped choose Black hole as this week's WP:ACID winner
editHi :)
editWhat's up Andonic? It has been a while since we have interacted, I have noticed that you are doing a great job on Wikipedia (hence the seconds for the barnstar :D). I have been pretty busy lately so I haven't been able to spend much time as I would like on Wikipedia :(. But I have a favor, how do you think my photography is. Has it improved, I would really like to hear your opinion as you were the one who really helped me out when I was just a beginner. Also if you have some tips/suggestions for me. You can view them here on flickr. Thanks for taking time; have a nice day :). ~ Arjun 20:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, check your email please. Thanks. Majorly (o rly?) 22:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely to you, but in any case, it read: You've probably been asked already, but would you like to be nominated for adminship? I think you'd do well, let me know if you're interested. Majorly (o rly?) 23:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well? Majorly (o rly?) 10:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hey bud; please email me too. I would love to co-nom you and here is why. (1. You have been one of the most kind users to me on Wikipedia; you were my first wikifriend and helped me out :). You are never in a bad mood, I have asked you random questions like how do you think my photography is and instead of giving me a one word response like "good" you give me a whole paragraph and useful tips/links (thanks for that ;). (2. You will benefit from the tools, you are a perfect mix with vandal fighting and article writing. You never focus on one part to the extreme (I kindof do lol), which I highly respect. Also you are not afraid to ask questions. Admins who aren't afraid to ask questions...are a heck of a lot better off then the ones who don't. Trust me :). So let me know okay? p.s: I have been really thinking about upgrading cameras; yes I have still be using the same one from my first hideous photo of the moon :P. I have had my eyes on the Digital Rebel XT. Yea yea I know a Canon SLR would be a big jump from my point and shoot Polaroid but I am really wanting to get advanced and adventure more with photography. I have been doing some research and I think this is a good idea but I would like to hear your opinion. Thanks. ~ Arjun 03:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well? Majorly (o rly?) 10:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
editI noticed you voiced an opinion in the first discussion on a Copyeditor's Barnstar/Award which was archived without decision. If you haven't already, would you please check in with the current discussion? The !votes/opinions from the first discussion, althought noted at the top, are not being counted in the current tally. It would be great if you would also weigh in on your preference of graphic design from among the choices (currently eight different images, the last being added at around 15:23, Thursday, 1 March 2007). If you !vote, please update the tally near the top of the discussion. Thanks. --PigmanTalk to me 21:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input. Being a copyeditor of longstanding, I feel it's a skill which often doesn't get the attention it deserves. And being an editor of longstanding, I understand that lack of respect for copyediting as well. Pushing around commas and periods, correcting spelling and phrasing... these are not glamorous tasks. Yet the proper placement and usage of them is essential to clear communication, a basic function of this project. I guess it should be obvious I think the award is a good idea and want to see it promoted in some form. Again, thanks for voicing an opinion in the matter. --PigmanTalk to me 22:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Reply
editWell, I'm not that popular, but at least everything is going AOkay here (no pun intended ;-)). --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 11:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I might, but when I have the time. Right now I have some work at home (good pun though ;)). --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 11:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
RickK Anti Vandalism Barnstar
editHey AndonicO! I got the RickK Anti Vandalism Barnstar! I feel so lucky today! I'm also happy I didn't leave! RyGuy 12:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Make that 3 barnstars in 2 days! :-) Yep. I did it again. I make an awards page, and I het a handful of awards! I should have made it a while ago! RyGuy 20:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Name
editHey AndonicO, this may seem like a silly question to ask , but is your username pronounced and-on-ick-oh (sorry, I don't know the real dictonary symbols)? RyGuy 15:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Userpage Template
editHello, AndonicO. I have copied your userpage template and changed it so that it will function under my username. You can see it here. If you don't want me to copy your userpage technique, please let me know and I won't go through with it. I await your approval (since you made the template) before implementing it. Captain panda In vino veritas 02:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me use your userpage template. I'll get to putting it into effect right now. Captain panda In vino veritas 11:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)