Failed good article nomination on December 4, 2024
Upon its review on December 4, 2024, this good article nomination was quick-failed because:
- No reason given: enter
copyvio,multiple,NPOV,previous,source,tags, orunstablein the first parameter.,
- No reason given: enter
thus making it ineligible for good article consideration.
This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.
 | This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:Quick fail}}). |
QF stands for quick fail.
The first parameter must be provided; the following options are available:
{{QF|copyvio}} --~~~~- for articles that contain copyright violations (WP:QF criterion 2){{QF|multiple}} --~~~~- for articles that are a long way from meeting any one of the Good Article criteria (WP:QF criterion 1){{QF|NPOV}} --~~~~- for articles that lack neutrality (part of WP:QF criterion 3){{QF|previous}} --~~~~- for articles where concerns from a previous GA nomination were not adequately addressed (WP:QF criterion 5){{QF|source}} --~~~~- for articles with too few references (part of WP:QF criterion 3){{QF|tags}} --~~~~- for articles that contain cleanup tags (WP:QF criterion 3){{QF|unstable}} --~~~~- for articles that are not stable due to edit warring (WP:QF criterion 4)
Optional comments can also be added by adding |comments=comment text to the end before the closing brackets.