Talk:Tulu Nadu

Regarding the editing rights to the page

I would like to suggest to take that power away bcoz Deltakannada has pure hate for TULUNAD and Tulu language hence he is making various irrelevant and bias edits and making baseless allegations which do not have any proof VIAANSH TULUNAD (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Language in South Canara

after Tulu major Speaking language is Beary, not Malayalam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unchiamaze (talk • contribs) 06:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Cthulhu-Nether

"Tulu" is one of many variations in spelling of Cthulhu. See its content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.200.161.250 (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Stop removing content related to Kasaragod of Tulunad

Stop removing content related to Kasaragod of Tulunad , adding only content of Udupi is not correct, മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Currently the article is only about Mangalore and Udupi district Folks content (POV) and ignored the content related to Muslims and Kasaragod, User:TuluveRai123 with his multiple accounts controlling content in this article. He is also abusing warning msg in my talk page , മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't have any other accounts other than this

TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

The article does have information about Kasargod. What you are trying to do is, make the article in your POV, and revert it from being neutral.

TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

What is Pov according to you ? Can you mention it what is POV I added മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

POV, or 'point of view,' refers to presenting content in a way that reflects the perspective of a particular group or individual, rather than providing a balanced or neutral view. In this case, the issue is that your edits seem to prioritize one perspective or group, focusing heavily on certain regions and communities while neglecting others. The article should reflect a broad, neutral view of Tulu Nadu, but your edits seem to narrow the focus, which could mislead readers about the region's diversity. I am not claiming that Kasaragod-related content has been removed entirely, but rather that the overall balance and neutrality of the article are being compromised. TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

[1] where is the information related Muslims community? Tulunad has one of oldest Masjid and Beary Muslim and Muslim Mappilas communities live in Tulunad, MLA, MP are also elected from Kasargod that shows numerical strength of Muslims in Tulunad, Your pushing you POV by removing Muslim related content.

I request admin to restore my version [2], മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

The article should present a comprehensive view of all communities in Tulu Nadu, not just focusing on one aspect or perspective. The claim that I am removing Muslim-related content is not accurate. I am working to ensure that the article includes all relevant information in a balanced and neutral way. I request that we maintain a neutral point of view (NPOV) for the article, rather than focusing disproportionately on any one group or community. TuluveRai123 (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

You can expand article by adding content related to other community , remember wikipedia doesn't belongs to you only to dictate content with multiple accounts, also Tulunad doesn't belongs to only Tuluvas it also belongs to other community, I also added both pro supporters and opposers of Tulunad state movement, I also added multiple political parties which have opposite ideology, I also added cuisine which is eaten by all communities of Kasaragod, മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

While it's important to represent all communities within Tulu Nadu, the article is specifically about the region of Tulu Nadu as a whole, not just Kasargod. Including content about Kasargod is necessary, but we must ensure the focus stays on Tulu Nadu's overall history, culture, and communities. The goal is to maintain a neutral point of view (NPOV) and ensure that the article covers all aspects of Tulu Nadu, not disproportionately focusing on one region or community.

TuluveRai123 (talk) 18:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making accusations without evidence and from engaging in disruptive editing. I do not have any other accounts, and such claims are unfounded. Wikipedia is a collaborative platform that relies on consensus and neutrality. The article must reflect a balanced and unbiased perspective, and all edits should adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines. Personal attacks, edit warring, and the use of multiple accounts to control content violate Wikipedia’s policies. Continued disruptive behavior may lead to further action by administrators. TuluveRai123 (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

RfC

There are two questions:

• Does this version [3] is against WP:NPOV ?
• If yes, How this version is POV pushing ?

മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 04:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

:*[4] how this version is NPOV , a mythology related to Hinduism is mentioned and history related Muslim is ignored, supporters of seperate Statehood is mentioned, opposers of seperate state is ignored, culture related to Tuluvas mentioned, culture related to other communities of proposed state is ignored.

മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 05:14, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Discussion

• Can you rephrase the RFC question? The 2nd question should be removed since it's too broad. The RFC should focus on one brief question. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 14:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

  Ok മംഗലാപുരം (talk) 15:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

  @മംഗലാപുരം I don't think Rfc is necessary since I don't see a much evidence for RFCBEFORE. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 15:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)