Wikipedia

Talk:Rock music of Canada

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Stuartwrossrockmusic in topic Volunteer to help with additional research
Learn more about this page
Former good article nomineeRock music of Canada was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
August 7, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Untitled

edit
Toolbox

article requires a major WP:OVERLINK cleanup

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

UPDATE HAS BEEN DONE Revision as of 16:52, 11 August 2009:

What the hell is Nickelback doing with a photo when there isn't a photo of the Guess Who? Was this written by a Canadian?202.67.103.172 (talk) 07:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Numerous words and band names are linked more than once in this article which requires some major cleanup. There are also many common words which have been unnecessarily wikilinked. Common words do not require wikilinks to further explain their meaning. Wether B (talk) 01:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes it does need a cleanup. Some of the links are just foolish. I would also point out that WP:MOSDATE is not being followed either as there are quite a few dates and years that are linked even though the linked date/year article has no content what-so-ever about Canadian music. GripTheHusk (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have received many pms about this ..Yes it does need fixing..and is a work in-progress if you were to note you will see the article has had a dramatic change to it since GA review last week.

What Wiki needs is more people editing rather then all the new individuals hopping from article to article adding tags all over Wiki. This is happening a lot lately and is making Wiki articles look invalid even though the articles are B levels. A note in Talk section like Wether has added is more then sufficient. Sorry about tag removal from Aug 10th Wether I was editing when you added it and was not aware i removed it. The problem with an artical this vast is the many many people who like to add there favorite band|musicians without reading to see if they are already mentioned,,thus multiple linking occurs. All help is a precipitated.... So if you see a problem pls take the time to fix it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am the one that has taken the time to redo the article and will un-Wikify soon. I have also re-done Music of Canada though it still need extensive expanding, I would like you guys to take a look at ...as it looks like both of you have been helping Wiki for some time now. Buzzzsherman (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I cleaned several multiple links to the same article (almost all of those I fixed were to individuals or bands), but there could still be some left.

There are also cities that are linked multiple times, should these be cleaned up? Puceron (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Good job "Puceron" I have done the rest!!! UPDATE: Tag removed ...overlink|article ....I have taken the time to un-Wikify (unlink) doubles, triples and the word Juno was linked 14 times in this article Revision as of 16:52, 11 August 2009: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canadian_rock&diff=307389908&oldid=307323914 174.115.165.184 (talk) 16:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Was thinking a redirect|rename article Canadian rock music any toughs?? 174.115.165.184 (talk) 19:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Dominated by powerful managers" reworded

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rush are far from puppets of a manager. They are the antithesis of corporate rock. I changed the sentence to something more neutral: "both featuring acclaimed managers". 192.133.12.101 (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quebec section

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If a section is going to be included about distinct Quebec music, then I think other genres are needed as well, such as music from Atlantic Canada. As it stands, that section says nothing about Rock, so I think it should instead be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.88.180 (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lame...

edit

Article is lame in too many ways to list. Overall, it defines bands as worth mentioning based solely on whether their records made the US top 40 charts. The author seems to be either from Borneo or downtown Toronto. Many of the acts mentioned are folk music, not rock.

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Canadian rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Canadian rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Rock music of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Volunteer to help with additional research

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I am semi-retired and have been studying the history of music at University as well as the history of rock music with its foundation genres of music.

And I am Canadian.

I’d like to volunteer to the page as a researcher with the goal of helping expand the page in areas already made a priority by the current managers and contributors. Although I’m not yet familiar with the tools to edit in Wikipedia, I am familiar with the standards of writing and proper citation. My family company is a leading editor for university textbooks. In 30 years, we’ve completed several hundred university textbooks.

It’s all out of personal interest.

Thank you,

Stuart Ross Stuartwrossrockmusic (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC).Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rock_music_of_Canada&oldid=1257351961"