Talk:Kronet Til Konge

Fair use rationale for Image:Dodheimsgard KronetTilKonge.jpg

Image:Dodheimsgard KronetTilKonge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

I question the move of this article

I question moving this article from Kronet Til Konge to Kronet til konge. WP:NCCAPS says "If the article is about a work in a foreign language (such as a book or other written work, movie, album, or song), using the capitalization found in most English language reliable sources is recommended." WP:ALBUMCAPS also says "In titles of songs or albums in a language other than English, following the capitalization found in most English-language sources is recommended." In this case, both the album cover (a reliable source per WP:PRIMARY) and the single source in the article (Allmusic) show the album titled as "Kronet Til Konge". The edit summary claims the move was to comply with the "Norwegian title rule", but no wikilink to that rule was actually provided. So I think this move should be undone, and the article moved back to Kronet Til Konge. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

No argument, so I have moved it back. Can be re-moved if support can be given for using "Kronet til konge" as the title. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)