Talk:K3 (group)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Poland1020 in topic

Untitled

edit

This section isn't true: "Even Robbie Williams gave them the thumbs up when he met them on a Dutch talkshow in 2005." Williams made fun of them. He was definitely being ironic. In an interview with Belgian magazine HUMO he referred to them as "robots", alluding to their rehearsed and unnatural ("phony") spontanity.

This entry reads too much like a press release, so I wouldn't be surprised if it was entered and maintained by the "band"'s management.

Josje

edit

It is worth noting that there was considerable objection against having a Dutch girl joining K3 and the fact she moved to Belgium soon afterwards to be more in touch with her Belgian fans? Many in Belgium would still be of the opinion that K3 lost popularity in Flanders because of it, yet gained more importance in the Netherlands.Jorgenpfhartogs (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quality

edit

The quality of the article can be greatly improved by totally rewriting it, e.g. as a translation of the Dutch version (nl:K3). I'm not saying I won't do it, just that I don't have time to do it at the moment. So if someone agrees and wants to do it, please go ahead. The band has been/is such a phenomenon that it certainly deserves a proper article. Gidi70 14:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

I contest that this band needs an English Wikipedia entry. Their significance beyond the Dutch-speaking world is nihil. The entry should be removed. 81.240.83.205 23:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The notability guidelines don't have their scope limited by the language of the Wikipedia. See e.g. the Wikipedia:Notability (music) guideline. To be notable, a band should meet any one of the twelve criteria mentioned there. K3 meets at least numbers 1 to 5, 10, 11 and possibly 9 and 12. Note that the criteria explicitly allow a band to be known or famous in a single country (2, 4, 11, 12). Gidi70 01:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

... Poland1020 (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Contradiction chart positions

edit

The article says that "Heyah Mama" was at the number one spot for 16 weeks, while the singles table lists the highest chart position as 2. That can't be right. Is the first statement talking about the Vlaamse Top 10 instead of the Ultratop 50? The source of the information was the Dutch Wikipedia, so I've also asked there.

Does anybody know any good sources for highest chart positions of songs? The official Ultratop 50 site doesn't go back that far. --Gidi70 00:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on K3 (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply