Talk:Interstate 94 in Michigan
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Imzadi1979 in topic Current reconstruction
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interstate 94 in Michigan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | Interstate 94 in Michigan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Interstate 94 in Michigan is part of the Interstate Highways in Michigan series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 13, 2019. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US 131 and Kalamazoo business loop
editThe sign for US 131 going east still say "BL-I 94". Would someone fix the exit for that? Please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:C401:9850:B9C9:5B63:60BF:9848 (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Current reconstruction
edit@Imzadi1979, may I ask why you are reverting my good faith attempts to add info to the page? I know it isn't perfect, yes, but is it really "low quality"? 104.37.208.5 (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is a featured article (FA). There is an expectation that we will strive to maintain the level of quality that has been set, particularly to follow the explicit criteria for FAs. One criterion relates to using high-quality reliable sources. While "reliable source" is a bit of a Wikipedia term of art as we use it, it does mean that we cannot use most self-published sources. I hold Chris Bessert in high esteem for the work he's done over the last quarter century on MichiganHighways.com, but that website is still self-published and does not currently merit an exception to our RS/SPS policy. That means we are not supposed to use the site on articles, and that prohibition goes double for FAs.
- Beyond that, I found a bunch of errors in the edits. Some of the details being added were minor to the history of I-94 and didn't warrant inclusion. The reconstruction of ramps at an interchange is not something worth mentioning. We consider resurfacing to be regular maintenance and do not include it in the history of a highway. Even basic rebuilds are just general maintenance and should be omitted.
- This brings up another point: the prose quality should be of a professional standard on FAs, and many additions failed to meet that standard. If that was the only issue, copy editing to polish the text would be appropriate, but since the additional content was either wrong, poorly sourced or unneeded, it's best to just remove it. Many, many man-hours have gone into getting this article properly researched and polished to the current state, and if someone doesn't strive to maintain the standards, that work will be for naught.
- This was the second reversion of low-quality additions to the article. WP:BRD isn't a policy, but it is a best practice. Those two rounds of additions were Bold, but they have been Reverted, so it's time to Discuss if any need to be added. If there is something specific, please feel free to suggest it with a source so that we can collaborate on it. Imzadi 1979 → 17:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)