| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Huaynaputina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | Huaynaputina is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
1600 eruption
editShould the 1600 eruption be moved to its own article like with many other significant eruptions? Given that it is a significant historical eruption and the article is lengthy, it makes perfect sense in my opinion. Mrmp2402 (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Eh, I think that since this volcano draws its importance almost entirely from that eruption, it can be left together. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
IUGS heritage site
editHow much information do we take from this. I've put in a small paragraph here. This paragraph seems kind of excessive, especially since the IUGS site isn't actually the volcano that the article is about; rather, it's the archaeological site that is mentioned in passing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
2023 update
editMostly done, save for the following:
- "Ekaykin, A. A., and A. N. Veres. "Temperature shifts in Central Antarctica after major volcanic eruptions in the second millennium of the Common Era." АРКТИКИ И АНТАРКТИКИ 69.3 (2023): 375" unknown source and do we need a discussion on temperature of Antarctica?
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Geotourism section?
editI am not sure whether this report on its own justifies a section on geotourism (maybe with a secondary source?), but if we want a section then it would be an eminently well-suited source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
2024 update
editThis Spanish meta-discussion about the relative importance of religious and scientific interpretations may be worth citing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)