This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've added some details, and links to the "Squadron..." and "Action..." pages. I've also put sections in, to match other ship pages. Hope that's OK. Xyl 54 (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Though sourced, is the claim of 48 casualties really believable? See here. Though acknowledging in the region of 1,400 men died, the numbers added up from the three good articles on the ships sunk amount to only just over 1,100 men. Other sources mentioned suggest closer to 375 men died from the Hogue. Benea (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Silverstone is the source for the data in all three articles, but the math doesn't add up. Feel free to replace the data if you can find a source that meets WP:RS. BTW, First World War isn't specifically BritEng so there was no need to change it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
