This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Germans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Germans. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Germans at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New World Map Image, New Zealand
editHi, i think we need a new world map image since there are actually more than 10,000 people of German descent in New Zealand- the real figure according to the New Zealand government is some 200,000.
A denial of German identity
editI'm going to reiterate what I said towards the end of a previous but now apparently stagnant discussion above.
The Germans are a nation, a Volk, with an ancient and rich history. Reducing them to "inhabitants of Germany" cannot be serious, nor can moralizing for half of the lead talking about the Holocaust. This is a disappointing article. Also the links to Merriam-Webster dictionary as sources for the lead sentence is weak. JDiala (talk) 23:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Vick, Brian (2003). "The Origins of the German Volk: Cultural Purity and National Identity in Nineteenth-Century Germany". German Studies Review. 26 (2). [German Studies Association, Johns Hopkins University Press]: 241–256. ISSN 0149-7952. JSTOR 1433324. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
- Moxy🍁 23:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JDiala: you are not giving any concrete proposals or sources, except perhaps that you would like the Holocaust the be given less space? Whatever we do with this article we have to keep in mind that attempts to make it say that Luxembourgers and Austrians are German, or that in contrast that many citizens of Germany are not Germans, are going to be controversial and need care and good sources. These are issues we've tried to handle using reliable published sources. Concerning the Holocaust, all moralizing aside this is an important part of German history which has had an impact upon "German identity". This might seem heavy but I don't think it should be removed? I personally think that the article might eventually be improved by adding more "cultural" sections about things like sport, cuisine, etc. and this might change the overall feeling of the article. Someone just needs to find time to work on such things.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- "reliable published sources" And since when is the Merriam-Webster dictionary a reliable source on European history? Dimadick (talk) 12:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merriam-Webster is used only to establish the meaning of the word itself, not for any history stuff. Rsk6400 (talk) 16:17, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. This is a citation in the lead, which is normally not needed, but there was quite a discussion in the past, also about what this article and other related articles should be about (and not about). --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Merriam-Webster is used only to establish the meaning of the word itself, not for any history stuff. Rsk6400 (talk) 16:17, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- "reliable published sources" And since when is the Merriam-Webster dictionary a reliable source on European history? Dimadick (talk) 12:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Infobox
editWhy if this infobox removed last 22 June, all ethnic group infoboxes are needed for ethnicity articles, unlike Americans, French people, Spaniards, etc. 49.150.12.163 (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- No they are not necessary, and they are often problematic - as in this case. See past discussions above. On the other hand, no one is stopping editors from proposing a better one.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 06:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are necessary to have an infoboxes for ethnic groups about the populations of Germans. If you want for a new consensus, just request for a comment. 49.150.12.163 (talk) 07:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Andrew Lancaster: See this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#"Germans", "French people" etc - ethnicity vs nationality about the use of infoboxes. 49.150.12.163 (talk) 07:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for those links but there is no consensus there. Discussion and consensus building has been ongoing since then on this talk page (also see the archives). But again, no-one is saying there can never be an infobox on this article, or that it can't be expanded. The biggest practical issue we had to discuss was how to define and distinguish the topics of this article and related articles. The removed infobox was confusing different topics and not adding any value. Remember also that we do have other articles such as German diaspora, which is what the infobox was mainly about.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Andrew Lancaster: I see, I would like to remove infoboxes for British people. 49.150.12.163 (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- You would need to discuss that there. Keep in mind that the situation on this article is not necessarily the same, but if you look through the archives here you might some relevant points.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Similar that to Chinese people without an infobox. See this recent discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#Infoboxes. 49.150.12.163 (talk) 10:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- You would need to discuss that there. Keep in mind that the situation on this article is not necessarily the same, but if you look through the archives here you might some relevant points.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Andrew Lancaster: I see, I would like to remove infoboxes for British people. 49.150.12.163 (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for those links but there is no consensus there. Discussion and consensus building has been ongoing since then on this talk page (also see the archives). But again, no-one is saying there can never be an infobox on this article, or that it can't be expanded. The biggest practical issue we had to discuss was how to define and distinguish the topics of this article and related articles. The removed infobox was confusing different topics and not adding any value. Remember also that we do have other articles such as German diaspora, which is what the infobox was mainly about.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note that I've rangeblocked the OP for block evasion.-- Ponyobons mots 16:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Names section
editPerhaps Roman Empire should be linked there and capitalised (i.e, just the word Empire, of course), that is, if such a modification is deemed acceptable here. Just an opinion... All the best! 85.186.127.155 (talk) 09:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks!--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for taking that into consideration! All the best! 85.186.127.155 (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- P.S. Shouldn't it be Roman Empire, with the term empire written with capital letter in the beginning? Just a thought... 85.186.127.155 (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds right to me. Done. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Very well then! Thank you very much! All the best once more! 85.186.127.155 (talk) 16:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds right to me. Done. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- P.S. Shouldn't it be Roman Empire, with the term empire written with capital letter in the beginning? Just a thought... 85.186.127.155 (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for taking that into consideration! All the best! 85.186.127.155 (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)