The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Granadan princess Fatima bint al-Ahmar was described as "surpassing the women of her time like the Night of Power surpasses all the other nights" by the historian Ibn al-Khatib?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This is my first "good article review," and is written in response to this request [1] at my talk page. I am basing my review on these criteria [2].
First, I should note that none of the "immediate failures" that preclude GA status are found in this article. The article is in good overall shape (avoids failure #1). The article contains no long quotes or passages that could lead to copyright violations (avoids failure #2). There are no cleanup tags or edit wars ongoing (avoids failure #3 and 4). I see no previous review with unanswered criticisms (avoids failure #5.)
Next, I'll review each GA criterion:
The article is clearly written. At times the language is a little formal; in the future, perhaps a more informal or relaxed style would make reading easier for readers who are not historians.
The article is very well sourced, with inline citations meticulously added throughout.
This criterion asks that an article be "broad in its coverage." This is the only criterion where I think the article could benefit from improvement. Specifically, I think the article would benefit from a "background" section where the geopolitical context of the Emirate is described. That section could also include some information on Fatima's family history in the Emirate, and the role of women in Granada during this period. Despite these suggestions, the article is broad in other ways. For instance the content on Fatima's legacy at the end of the article draws upon commentary from a contemporary poet, from modern historians, and describes Fatima's lasting impact.
The article shows no bias that I can perceive.
The article is not subject to edit wars or content disputes.
The article contained one diagram at its conclusion. I have added two additional and relevant images to ensure it is sufficiently illustrated.
Based upon these article qualities, I recommend that the article be promoted to good article status. My thanks to the authors. -Darouet (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Darouet: Thank you for taking a look and for your feedback. I agree with your point regarding background, I added a background section containing the geopolitical context and the role of women as recorded in history. Please take a look if it looks okay, and let me know if you have further feedback. HaEr48 (talk) 04:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Darouet: Sorry for pinging, I notice the review is still open for a while after my last response. Do you plan to do another round of review, or are you ready to make a decision? HaEr48 (talk) 03:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
In the second sentence of the lead, is barnabaj the correct term? I cannot find a definition of it & am wondering if it is a non-standard transliteration. Can someone please provide a link to a source that explains this term? Peaceray (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yeah me neither. I was actually thinking of starting an article on the topic but couldn't find any sources.VRtalk14:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Vice regent and Peaceray: It is indeed a typo, thanks for noticing. The correct transliteration is barnamaj which is correctly spelled in the article body. Even this I find unusual, but it comes up in multiple sources (including Rubiera Mata, Boloix Gallardo), and I see no reason to doubt it. For what it's worth there is an entry in wiktionary: wikt:برنامج, it seems close enough. It may also have been an Andalusian Arabic terminology which has different meanings elsewhere. HaEr48 (talk) 02:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
