Talk:Baahubali 2: The Conclusion
 | Baahubali 2: The Conclusion was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 16, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Baahubali 2: The Conclusion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Thewikizoomer (talk · contribs) 07:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 09:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
This is a WP:QUICKFAIL based on criterion 3 (It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags.
). The current version has several maintenance tags that should be addressed before renomination. TompaDompa (talk) 09:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Language
edit@Anoopspeaks: @DeluxeVegan: @Manick22: @Monhiroe: @Manick22: @Ab207: @Jayanthkumar123: @Luigi Boy: @Kailash29792:
I'm surprised many reviewers didn't mention the lack of lip sync in Tamil.
From The New Indian Express, Some of the lip-syncing in the Tamil version is awful. You hear “Azhaithu vaarungal”, but you see the mouth say, “Theesko randi.” You hear “Naan”, but see the mouth say, “Nenu.”
[1]
From same company Cinema Express [2], Many, many films, including Baahubali [...] have been following a worrying formula: Cast an actor each from across regions to appeal to the respective audiences, get them speaking that language, but by and large, shoot the film with the characters speaking one dominant language. In the case of Baahubali of course, this was Telugu
. No doubt, they were referring to part 2 here.
I'll look for sources in the Tamil language as well but I want to include a statement such that highlight the fact that the sequel, unlike the predecessor, dubbed many scenes from Telugu. How many scenes do you have to retake to become infobox worthy and like Anoopspeaks and I discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#CBFC mystery. Some films can get straight certificate, despite not reshooting any scenes, which isn't the case here. But it only should be included if deemed significant. Alternatively, the wording can be changed if and only if more sources are found proving the same. DareshMohan (talk) 01:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- We can state "few scenes were partially reshot in Tamil", or use the above source and write "although shot in Tamil, few scenes were dubbed from Telugu version". Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/Mind-your-language/article17074029.ece
- https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/tollywood/120517/less-talk-and-more-action-in-baahubali-2.html
- https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/tamil/prabhas-baahubali2-rajinikanth-2-0-satellite-rights-tamil-films-4571960/
- I’m not sure how much this will be useful, but all I can say is, well played, Rajamouli. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 03:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)